coronary artery disease

     

Select            
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathmyocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)

anti-anginal drugs  

nicorandil  
Nishimura, 2009   nicorandilcontrolRisk of bias -
ranolazine  
MARIZA, 2004     ranolazine 1000mgplaceboLow risk of bias -
RAN080, 2005     ranolazine 1000mgplaceboLow risk of bias -
CARISA 1000mg, 2004     ranolazine 1000mgplacebo (on top standard treatment)Low risk of bias negative
ERICA, 2006      NCTranolazine 1000mg + amlodipineplacebo + amlodipineLow risk of bias -

anticoagulant  

not classified  
MacMillan, 1960   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Borchegrevink, 1960   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Clausen, 1961   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Harvald, 1961   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Conrad, 1964     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Wasserman, 1966   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Loeliger, 1967   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Lovell, 1967   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Seaman, 1969     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Sorensen, 1969   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Meuwisse,, 1969   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Drapkin and Merskey, 1972     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Sixty Plus Reinfarction, 1980   coumarin congenersplaceboLow risk of bias -
ASPECT, 1994   nicoumalone or phenprocoumonplacebo -
Breddin, 1980   phenprocoumonplaceboLow risk of bias -
dicoumarol  
Apenstrom and Korsan-Bengtsen, 1964   dicoumarolno anticoagulant -
wafarin  
WARIS, 1990   warfarinplaceboLow risk of bias -

cell-based therapies  

not classified  
REVASC (Stewart), 2006     VEGF gene transfercontrol -
Ramshorst, 2009     autologous bone marrow–derived mononuclear cellsplaceboLow risk of bias -
Losordo, 2011      NCTCD34+ cellsplaceboExploratory -
Losordo, 2007      NCTstem cells CD34+placeboLow risk of bias -
VIVA (Henry), 2003     vascular endothelial growth factorplaceboLow risk of bias -
fibroblast growth factor  
FIRST (Simons), 2002     fibroblast growth factorplaceboLow risk of bias -
AGENT-1 (Grines), 2002     fibroblast growth factor geneplacebo -
AGENT-2 (Grines), 2003     fibroblast growth factor geneplacebo -
AGENT-3    NCTfibroblast growth factor geneplacebo -
AGENT-4    NCTfibroblast growth factor geneplacebo -
AWARE    NCTfibroblast growth factor geneplaceboLow risk of bias -
AGENT 3 and 4 pooled   fibroblast growth factor geneplacebo -
gene therapy  
EUROINJECT-ONE (Gyöngyösi), 2005     gene therapyplaceboLow risk of bias -

death and events prevention  

aspirin  
CDPA, 1976   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-30%
Cardiff I, 1974   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-26%
Cardiff II, 1979   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-17%
Vogel, 1979   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-32%
AMIS, 1980    NCTaspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting11%
GAMIS, 1980   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%
PARIS, 1980   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%
JAMIS, 1999     aspirinplacebosuggesting18%
SAPAT, 1992   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
clopidogrel  
CAPRIE, 1996     clopidogrelaspirinLow risk of bias -
ASCET    NCTclopidogrelaspirinRisk of bias negative
dipyridamol  
Atlanta (Sbar), 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative
Becker, 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative
Wirecki, 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative
Igloe, 1970   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Zion, 1961   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Kinsella, 1962   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Leiberman, 1964   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Dewar, 1961   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Neumann, 1964   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Foulds, 1960   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
PARIS, 1980   dipyridamol + aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
PARIS-II, 1986   dipyridamol + aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
PARIS, 1980   dipyridamol + aspirinaspirinLow risk of bias negative
ticlopidine  
Berglund, 1985   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias negative

Drug eluting stent  

not classified  
ISAR-CABG, 2011      NCTDESbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting9%-32%
TINOX, 2005     titanium-nitride-oxide coated stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
PAINT (sirolimus), 2009      NCTbiodegradable-polymerBMSRisk of bias -
EVOLVE, 2012      NCTbioabsorbable polymer EESeverolimus eluting stent -
Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III, 2009    NCTkissing balloonno kissing balloonRisk of bias negative∞%-67%
NEVO RES-ELUTION I    NCTNevopaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory -
Costar II, 2008      NCTCoStar stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative -31%47%
COSTAR II diabetic (sub group), 2008     CoStar stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative
TRIAS-HR, 2008   Genous stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-81%
BIOFREEDOM    NCTpolymer-free biolimus a9-eluting stentspaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory -
BBC ONE, 2008      NCTdouble stenting with PESsingle stentingnegative 100%211%
CACTUS , 2009     double stenting with SESsingle stentingRisk of bias negative-67%24%
Colombo, 2004     double stenting with SESsingle stentingExploratory negative200%0%
Ferenc, 2008     double stenting with SESsingle stentingExploratory negative-50%100%
NORDIC , 2006     double stenting with SESsingle stentingRisk of bias negative -40%96%
Pan, 2004     double stenting with SESsingle stentingExploratory negative7%-79%
ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009          NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-11%17%
ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009     polymer free sirolimus stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative0%26%
ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009     sirolimus biodegradable polymersirolimus eluting stentnegative0%-25%
ISAR-TEST-4 (biodegradable polymer), 2009    NCTsirolimus biodegradable polymersirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-1%4%
ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009      NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentzotarolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR TEST 5    NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentzotarolimus eluting stent click to display paper's table" >Risk of bias negative-18%
abciximab  
Kim, 2010     abciximab-coated stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
biolimus eluting stent  
LEADERS, 2008      NCTbiolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-9%25%
candesartan  
SYNTAX (unprotected left main sub group), 2009     DESCABGRisk of bias suggesting0%0%
dactinomycin eluting stent  
ACTION, 2004   dactinomycin eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-56%161%
drug-eluting stents  
PASEO, 2009   drug-eluting stentsbare-metal stent -
DEDICATION, 2008      NCTdrug-eluting stentsbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting100%
GENIUS-STEMI, 2009     Genous stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative-∞%
Boudriot, 2008   DESCABGExploratory negative-61%
FREEDOM, 2012      NCTPCI with drug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias negative
Hong, 2005     PCI withdrug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias -
everolimus eluting stent  
FUTURE I, 2004     everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
FUTURE II, 2006   everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
SPIRIT I, 2005    NCTeverolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative∞%
BASKET-PROVE (EES), 2010   everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-27%-36%
RESET, 2011    NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stent -
PLATINUM, 2011      NCTeverolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent -
SPIRIT II, 2006      NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-65%
SPIRIT IV, 2010          NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-17%-39%
SPIRIT III, 2008        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-2%-32%
COMPARE, 2009        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting21%-48%
SPIRIT III (small vessel subgroup), 2009     everolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting∞%∞%
SORT OUT IV, 2012      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR-TEST 4 (EES vs SES)     everolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting
paclitaxel  
ISAR-DESIRE (PES vs PTCA), 2005     paclitaxel eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-67%∞%
TAXUS I, 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative
TAXUS II, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%139%
TAXUS IV, 2004        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting11%146%
SCORE, 2004   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting ∞%∞%
TAXUS V (all patients), 2005    NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-11%17%
TAXUS VI, 2005        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%4%
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%-16%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
Erglis, 2007     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-6%-33%
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%-18%
TAXUS II (diabetics), 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS IV (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS V (diabetics), 2005   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS VI (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
SOS, 2008        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting138%-52%
TAXUS V small vessels sub groups   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stent -
ASPECT, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting∞%
ELUTES, 2004     paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
DELIVER, 2004   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-75%98%
PATENCY, 2002   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative-100%
TAXUS V ISR, 2006      NCTpaclitaxel eluting balloonbrachytherapyRisk of bias -
SYNTAX, 2009          NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentCABGRisk of bias suggesting 25%47%
ISAR-test (diabetics), 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
sirolimus eluting stent  
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PTCA), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-33%∞%
Kochiadakis, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
RAVEL, 2002      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-2%-21%
SIRIUS, 2003            NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting64%-13%
C-SIRIUS, 2004      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-50%
E-SIRIUS, 2003      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting102%102%
SES-SMART, 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-80%
DIABETES, 2005       sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
Pache et al, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting40%
PRISON II, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-33%
SCANDSTENT, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-3%
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%-1%
DECODE, 2005      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%
SCORPIUS, 2007    NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%-38%
Ortolani et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
Pasceri, 2003   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
GISSOC II, 2010      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
BASKET-PROVE (SES), 2010   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-19%-65%
Ravel (diabetics), 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
SES-SMARt (diabetics), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-22%
DESSERT, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting54%-19%
SIRIUS (diabetics), 2003     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
Díaz de la Llera, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
RRISC, 2006    NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting∞%192%
SCANDSTENT (subgroup), 2006     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting-100%
CRISTAL    NCTsirolimus eluting stentPTCA -
RIBS-II, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentPTCAsuggesting-3%-3%
SISR, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbrachytherapyRisk of bias suggesting∞%
PRECOMBAT, 2011    NCTsirolimus eluting stentCABG -
Thiele, 2009    NCTPCI withsirolimus ESMIDCABRisk of bias -
Tomai, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
TAXi, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-35%
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting100%-50%
ISAR-DIABETES, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-33%67%
SIRTAX (Windecker), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-54%-21%
CORPAL, 2005   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-21%-18%
REALITY, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting74%-14%
ISAR-SMART 3, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-23%43%
Zhang (SES vs PES), 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative-6%-36%
LONG DES II, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting∞%-22%
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%-2%
SORT OUT II, 2008      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
Cervinka, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative∞%-11%
Petronio et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-50%0%
Han, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-26%-35%
BASKET (vs paclitaxel), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-3%-22%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%33%
ISAR-TEST-1, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-33%
ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-24%8%
Kim, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-1%-1%
Pan, 2007   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-34%-1%
DES-DIABETES, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-100%0%
SIRTAX diabetics, 2005        NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
TAxi (diabetics)   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
REALITY (diabetics), 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
ISAR-DESIRE-2, 2010    NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias -
Wessely, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory -
SIRTAX (small vessels subgroup), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting12%2%
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ENDEAVOR II, 2006   zotarolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
RESOLUTE All comers, 2010        NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-41%3%
TWENTE, 2012      NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent click to display paper's table" > -
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-9%-56%
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZoMaxx I, 2008     zotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
ZEST (vs PES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting-40%-24%
ENDEAVOR III, 2006        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting -30%-82%
PROTECT, 2012    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ZEST (vs SES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-15%-15%
SORT-OUT-3, 2010      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative 45%247%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%-100%

fractional-flow-reserve-guided PCI  

not classified  
FAME II, 2012        NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-67%
PCI  
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%-34%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative∞%

myocardial revascularization  

not classified  
Serruys Benestent 2, 1998     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Versaci , 1997     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Fischman STRESS, 1994     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Serruys Benestent, 1994       stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Moer, 2001     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Doucet, 2001     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Koning, 2001     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Park, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Lotan, 2000     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Weaver, 2000     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Dangas, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Fluck, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Lafont, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Witkowski, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Kastrati, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Di Marlo, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Serruys, 2000     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Lincoff (EPISTENT), 1999        NCTstentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Buller, 1999     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Betriu, 1999     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Hoher, 1999     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Sievert, 1999     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Eeckout, 1996   stentballoon angioplastynegative
Sirnes, 1996     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Savage, 1998     stentballoon angioplastynegative
Erbel, 1998     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Rubartelli, 1998       stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Hancock, 1998     stentballoon angioplastysuggesting
Rodriguez, 1998     stentballoon angioplastynegative
TINOX, 2005     titanium-nitride-oxide coated stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
PAINT (sirolimus), 2009      NCTbiodegradable-polymerBMSRisk of bias -
EVOLVE, 2012      NCTbioabsorbable polymer EESeverolimus eluting stent -
FAME II, 2012        NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-67%
NEVO RES-ELUTION I    NCTNevopaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory -
Leon (high dose), 2005     TMRplaceboLow risk of bias negative-48%
Leon (low dose), 2005   TMRplaceboLow risk of bias negative-48%
SYNTAX (diabetic), 2010      NCTPCI with drug-eluting stentsCABGExploratory -
ARTS, 2001             stentCABGnegative
ERACI II, 2003       stentCABGRisk of bias suggesting
SOS, 2002            NCTstentCABGRisk of bias suggesting
CARDia (PCI), 2008   stentCABGRisk of bias negative
LEMANS, 2002      NCTstentCABGExploratory negative
MASS II, 2007     stentCABGRisk of bias negative49%
Myoprotect, 2004     stentCABGExploratory -
Cisowski   stentE-ACABnegative
STICH (vs med), 2011    NCTCABGmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -9%
CASS subgroup, 1985       CABGmedical treatmentExploratory suggesting-50%
Schofield, 1999       TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Allen, 1999           TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative 26%
Frazier, 1999       TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
ATLANTIC (Burkhoff), 1999     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Aaberge, 2000         TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative57%
Huikeshoven, 2003     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory -
PACIFIC, 2000     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Stone, 2002     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%
Salem, 2004     TMRmedical treatmentLow risk of bias negative
van der Sloot, 2004     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory negative∞%
March, 1999   TMRmedical treatmentExploratory -
Gray, 2003     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory negative
Diegeler, 2002       stentMIDCABRisk of bias negative
Drenth, 2002         stentMIDCABRisk of bias negative
Grip, 2001   stentMIDCABnegative
SIMA, 2000   stentMIDCABnegative
Kim, 2005     stentMIDCABRisk of bias -
OCTOSTENT, 2003        NCTstentOPCABRisk of bias negative
Costar II, 2008      NCTCoStar stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative -31%47%
COSTAR II diabetic (sub group), 2008     CoStar stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative
TRIAS-HR, 2008   Genous stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-81%
BIOFREEDOM    NCTpolymer-free biolimus a9-eluting stentspaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory -
ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009          NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-11%17%
ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009     polymer free sirolimus stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative0%26%
ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009     sirolimus biodegradable polymersirolimus eluting stentnegative0%-25%
ISAR-TEST-4 (biodegradable polymer), 2009    NCTsirolimus biodegradable polymersirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-1%4%
Galiñanes, 2004     TMRthoracic sympathectomyExploratory negative
ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009      NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentzotarolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR TEST 5    NCTdual sirolimus, probucol eluting stentzotarolimus eluting stent click to display paper's table" >Risk of bias negative-18%
abciximab  
Kim, 2010     abciximab-coated stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
angioplasty  
AMIST (Reeves), 2004     angioplastyMIDCABRisk of bias -
biolimus eluting stent  
LEADERS, 2008      NCTbiolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-9%25%
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery  
Allen, 2000     TMR+CABGCABG -
STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009      NCTCABG+surgical ventricular reconstructionCABGnegative-3%-9%
Loubani, 2003     TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
Zhao, 2006   TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
MASS II, 2007     CABGmedical treatmentnegative
VA, 1984   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
ECSS (European), 1988   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
CASS, 1983    NCTCABGmedical treatmentnegative
Texas, 1977   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
Oregon, 1979   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
New zealand 1, 1981   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
BARI 2D, 2009          NCTCABG or PCImedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
dactinomycin eluting stent  
ACTION, 2004   dactinomycin eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-56%161%
drug-eluting stents  
Boudriot, 2008   DESCABGExploratory negative-61%
FREEDOM, 2012      NCTPCI with drug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias negative
Hong, 2005     PCI withdrug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias -
everolimus eluting stent  
FUTURE I, 2004     everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
FUTURE II, 2006   everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
SPIRIT I, 2005    NCTeverolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative∞%
RESET, 2011    NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stent -
PLATINUM, 2011      NCTeverolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent -
SPIRIT II, 2006      NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-65%
SPIRIT IV, 2010          NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-17%-39%
SPIRIT III, 2008        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-2%-32%
SORT OUT IV, 2012      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR-TEST 4 (EES vs SES)     everolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting
ESSENCE diabetes      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus ES -
paclitaxel  
ISAR-DESIRE (PES vs PTCA), 2005     paclitaxel eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-67%∞%
TAXUS I, 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative
TAXUS II, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%139%
TAXUS IV, 2004        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting11%146%
SCORE, 2004   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting ∞%∞%
TAXUS V (all patients), 2005    NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-11%17%
TAXUS VI, 2005        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%4%
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%-16%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
TAXUS II (diabetics), 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS IV (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS V (diabetics), 2005   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS VI (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
ASPECT, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting∞%
ELUTES, 2004     paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
DELIVER, 2004   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-75%98%
PATENCY, 2002   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative-100%
SYNTAX, 2009          NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentCABGRisk of bias suggesting 25%47%
ISAR-test (diabetics), 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
PCI  
AVERT, 1995     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-7%-7%
COURAGE, 2007      NCTPCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-11%
MASS II, 2007       PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative -5%
Dakik, 1998     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative16%
ALKK, 2003     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -64%
Hambrecht, 2004     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Bech, 2001     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-49%
TIME, 2001         PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias -
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%-34%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative∞%
AWESOME, 2001                   PCICABGRisk of bias -
PTCA  
RITA 2, 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting2%96%
ACME, 1992     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting9%70%
Sievers, 1993   balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%100%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting 0%0%
ACME 2 (Folland), 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-12%-67%
ACIP, 1997     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory negative -81%
INSPIRE, 2006     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative94%
SWISSI II, 2007      NCTballoon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory suggesting -70%
BARI, 1996      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative18%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-3%
CABRI, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative 42%
EAST, 1994      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative 14%
GABI, 1994     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -57%
Lausanne, 1994   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative288%
RITA, 1993   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -9%
ERACI, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative103%
Toulouse, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-29%
sirolimus eluting stent  
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PTCA), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-33%∞%
Kochiadakis, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
RAVEL, 2002      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-2%-21%
SIRIUS, 2003            NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting64%-13%
C-SIRIUS, 2004      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-50%
E-SIRIUS, 2003      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting102%102%
SES-SMART, 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-80%
DIABETES, 2005       sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
Pache et al, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting40%
PRISON II, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-33%
SCANDSTENT, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-3%
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%-1%
DECODE, 2005      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%
SCORPIUS, 2007    NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%-38%
Ortolani et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
Pasceri, 2003   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
GISSOC II, 2010      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting
Ravel (diabetics), 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
SES-SMARt (diabetics), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-22%
SIRIUS (diabetics), 2003     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
PRECOMBAT, 2011    NCTsirolimus eluting stentCABG -
Thiele, 2009    NCTPCI withsirolimus ESMIDCABRisk of bias -
Tomai, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
TAXi, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-35%
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting100%-50%
ISAR-DIABETES, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-33%67%
SIRTAX (Windecker), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-54%-21%
CORPAL, 2005   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-21%-18%
REALITY, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting74%-14%
ISAR-SMART 3, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-23%43%
Zhang (SES vs PES), 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative-6%-36%
LONG DES II, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting∞%-22%
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%-2%
SORT OUT II, 2008      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
Cervinka, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative∞%-11%
Petronio et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-50%0%
Han, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-26%-35%
BASKET (vs paclitaxel), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-3%-22%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%33%
ISAR-TEST-1, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-33%
ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-24%8%
Pan, 2007   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-34%-1%
SIRTAX diabetics, 2005        NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
TAxi (diabetics)   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
REALITY (diabetics), 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
DES-DIABETES, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-100%0%
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ENDEAVOR II, 2006   zotarolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
RESOLUTE All comers, 2010        NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-41%3%
TWENTE, 2012      NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent click to display paper's table" > -
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-9%-56%
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZoMaxx I, 2008     zotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
ZEST (vs PES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting-40%-24%
ENDEAVOR III, 2006        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting -30%-82%
PROTECT, 2012    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ZEST (vs SES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-15%-15%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%-100%

transmyocardial revacularization  

not classified  
Leon (high dose), 2005     TMRplaceboLow risk of bias negative-48%
Leon (low dose), 2005   TMRplaceboLow risk of bias negative-48%
Schofield, 1999       TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Allen, 1999           TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative 26%
Frazier, 1999       TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
ATLANTIC (Burkhoff), 1999     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Aaberge, 2000         TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative57%
Huikeshoven, 2003     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory -
PACIFIC, 2000     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Stone, 2002     TMRmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%
Salem, 2004     TMRmedical treatmentLow risk of bias negative
van der Sloot, 2004     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory negative∞%
March, 1999   TMRmedical treatmentExploratory -
Gray, 2003     TMRmedical treatmentExploratory negative
Galiñanes, 2004     TMRthoracic sympathectomyExploratory negative
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery  
Allen, 2000     TMR+CABGCABG -
Loubani, 2003     TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
Zhao, 2006   TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -