cardiovascular prevention

     

Select            
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathcardiovascular events

ACAT inhibition  

pactimibe  
CAPTIVATE, 2009      NCTpactimibeplaceboLow risk of bias -
ACTIVATE, 2006      NCTpactimibeplaceboLow risk of bias -

anticoagulant  

not classified  
MacMillan, 1960   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Borchegrevink, 1960   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Clausen, 1961   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Harvald, 1961   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Conrad, 1964     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Wasserman, 1966   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Loeliger, 1967   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Lovell, 1967   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Seaman, 1969     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Sorensen, 1969   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Meuwisse,, 1969   anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Drapkin and Merskey, 1972     anticoagulantno anticoagulant -
Sixty Plus Reinfarction, 1980   coumarin congenersplaceboLow risk of bias -
ASPECT, 1994   nicoumalone or phenprocoumonplacebo -
Breddin, 1980   phenprocoumonplaceboLow risk of bias -
dicoumarol  
Apenstrom and Korsan-Bengtsen, 1964   dicoumarolno anticoagulant -
rivaroxaban  
COMPASS (rivaroxaban alone), 2017    NCTrivaroxabanaspirinsecondary prevention -
COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017      NCTrivaroxaban + aspirinaspirinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias - 8100%
wafarin  
WARIS, 1990   warfarinplaceboLow risk of bias -
warfarin  
Thrombosis Prevention trial (Warfarin), 1998        NCTwarfarinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -17%
Thrombosis Prevention trial (W plus A), 1998        NCTwarfarin + aspirinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -7%

antioxydants  

not classified  
Tepel, 2003     acetylcysteineplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting9%-40%
HPS antioxidant, 2002     combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative4%0%
WAVE (Waters), 2002     combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative 165%56%
POPADAD (antioxydant), 2008   combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative 43%
PHS II beta carotene, 2003          NCTcombinationplaceboLow risk of bias -
SUVIMAX, 2005     combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative-22%-1%
HATS, 2001     combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative-10%-32%
MVP, 1997     combinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative1%
PHS II (multivitamin), 2012        NCTcombinationplaceboLow risk of bias negative-5%
ARISE, 2008      NCTsuccinobucol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting 0%
beta carotene  
ATBC beta carotene, 1994     beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias -
CARET beta carotene, 1996       beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative 17%
SCP beta carotene, 1990   beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative7%
NSCP (Green) beta carotene, 1999     beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative-49%
PHS beta carotene, 1996     beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-91%-91%
WHS beta carotene, 1999        NCTbeta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative7%14%
WACS beta-caroten, 2007        NCTbeta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative3%9%
ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (b carotene), 1998     beta caroteneplaceboLow risk of bias negative
vitamin c  
WACS vitamin C, 2007        NCTvitamin CplaceboLow risk of bias negative3%1%
PHS II vitamin C, 2008    NCTvitamin CplaceboLow risk of bias negative6%-1%
vitamin e  
GISSI, 1999     vitamin EcontrolRisk of bias negative-8%-2%
PPP, 2001     vitamin EcontrolRisk of bias negative7%7%
ATBC vitamin E, 1994     vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-2%
CHAOS, 1996   vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting29%-40%
HOPE, 2000     vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative5%
AREDS, 2001     vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative5%
Linxian, 1993     vitamin Eplacebonegative-9%
WACS vitamin E, 2007        NCTvitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative2%-8%
PHS II vitamin E, 2008    NCTvitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative 3%-1%
WHS vitamin E, 2005      NCTvitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ASAP, 2000         vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative100%
SPACE, 2000     vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting9%-46%
HOPE renal insufficiency subgroup, 2004     vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative-10%4%
ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (vitamin E), 1998       vitamin EplaceboLow risk of bias negative

antiplatelets drug  

aspirin  
JPAD, 2008      NCTaspirinno treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-20%
PPP (diabetics sub group), 2003   aspirinno treatmentExploratory negative23%-10%
British Doctor’s Trial, 1988   aspirinno treatmentprimary preventionRisk of bias negative-11%-2%
Primary Prevention Project, 2001     aspirinno treatmentprimary preventionRisk of bias negative -19%-28%
POPADAD aspirin, 2008     aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-7%-1%
DAMAD, 1989   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative -51%48%
ETDRS, 1992   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-7%-5%
PHS (diabetics sub group), 1989   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
WHS (diabetics sub group), 2005   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-7%
Physicians Health Study, 1989    NCTaspirinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -4%-17%
Thrombosis Prevention Trial, 1998        NCTaspirinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting3%-12%
HOT, 1998     aspirinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -7%-14%
Women’s Health Study, 2005       aspirinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -5%-9%
AAA, 2009     aspirinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-5%0%
ASPREE, 2018    NCTaspirinplacebo -
ASCEND, 2018      NCTaspirinplacebosuggesting -12%
Schoop, 1983   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias -
Hess, 1985   aspirinplacebo -
Munich A, 1975   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias -
Munich B, 1975   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias -
CLIPS, 2007     aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting71%
CDPA, 1976   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-30%
Cardiff I, 1974   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-26%
Cardiff II, 1979   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-17%
Vogel, 1979   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-32%
AMIS, 1980    NCTaspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting11%
GAMIS, 1980   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%
PARIS, 1980   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%
JAMIS, 1999     aspirinplacebosuggesting18%
SAPAT, 1992   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-29%
clopidogrel  
CAPRIE, 1996   clopidogrelaspirinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting-2%-8%
CAPRIE (PAD subgroup), 1996   clopidogrelaspirinLow risk of bias suggesting-19%
ASCET    NCTclopidogrelaspirinRisk of bias negative-10%
CHARISMA, 2006      NCTclopidogrelplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -1%-7%
dipyridamol  
Atlanta (Sbar), 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative25%
Becker, 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative∞%
Wirecki, 1967   dipyridamolcontrolLow risk of bias negative
Hess (2), 1985   aspirin + dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Schoop (2), 1983   aspirin + dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
VA study, 1986   aspirin + dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Igloe, 1970   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Zion, 1961   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Kinsella, 1962   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Leiberman, 1964   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Dewar, 1961   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Neumann, 1964   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Foulds, 1960   dipyridamolplaceboLow risk of bias -
PARIS, 1980   dipyridamol + aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
PARIS-II, 1986   dipyridamol + aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
PARIS, 1980   dipyridamol + aspirinaspirinLow risk of bias negative
ketanserine  
PACK, 1996   ketanserineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Walden, 1991   ketanserineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Thulesius, 1987   ketanserineplaceboLow risk of bias -
picotamide  
Cocozza, 1995     picotamideplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
ADEP, 1993   picotamideplaceboLow risk of bias -
Neirotti, 1994   picotamideplaceboLow risk of bias -
Coto, 1989   picotamideplaceboLow risk of bias -
sulfinpyrazone  
Dutch, 1980   sulfinyrazoneplacebonegative∞%107%
suloctidil  
Adriaensen, 1976   suloctidilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Verhaeghe, 1981   suloctidilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Jones, 1982   suloctidilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Holm, 1984   suloctidilplaceboLow risk of bias -
ticagrelor  
EUCLID, 2016        NCTticagrelorclopidogrelLow risk of bias -
PEGASUS 60mg, 2015        NCTticagrelorplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -11%-15%
PEGASUS 90mg, 2015        NCTticagrelorplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting 0%-15%
ticlopidine  
Birmingham-A, 1979   ticlopidineplacebonegative-100%
London diabetes, 1983   ticlopidineplacebonegative5%-47%
TIMAD, 1984   ticlopidineplacebonegative-27%-44%
BTRS, 1992   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
Nyberg, 1984   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%∞%
EMATAP, 1993   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Katsumara, 1982   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Aukland, 1982   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Stiegler, 1984   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Ellis, 1986   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Cloarec, 1986   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Arcan, 1988   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Balsano, 1989   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
STIMS, 1990   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Hurlow, 1980   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Krause, 1980   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Berglund, 1985   ticlopidineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
various  
CRAMPS, 2000   cloricromeneplaceboLow risk of bias -
vorapaxar  
TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012        NCTvorapaxarplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting -4%-13%
TRA-2P TIMI 50 (no prior stroke sub group), 2012     vorapaxarplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionExploratory suggesting-16%
TRA-2P TIMI 50 (MI subgroup), 2012        NCTvorapaxarplacebo (on top aspirin)secondary preventionExploratory suggesting -7%-19%

CEPT inhibition  

not classified  
REVEAL HPS-3 TIMI-55, 2017    NCTanacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias remark
dal-VESSEL, 2011   dalcetrapibplaceboExploratory -
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012      NCTdalcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative-1%4%
ACCELERATE, 2017      NCTevacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-16%-3%
anacetrapib  
DEFINE, 2010    NCTanacetrapibplaceboExploratory negative38%-24%
REALIZE, 2015      NCTanacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative
torcetrapib  
RADIANCE 1, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboExploratory negative-100%
ILLUMINATE, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative 58%16%
RADIANCE 2, 2007     torcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias -
ILLUSTRATE, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboExploratory negative35%

cholesterol lowering intervention  

not classified  
FACS, 2010     acute coronary syndrome early initiation -
Shalnev VI, 2007   acute coronary syndrome early initiation -
FATS, 1990    NCTintensive lipid-lowering therapydietprimary preventionExploratory negative∞%
Sakamoto, 2006     any statinno statinacute coronary syndrome early initiation Risk of bias -
POSCH, 1990      NCTpartial ileum bypass surgeryno surgeryRisk of bias negative-22%
SOLID-TIMI 52      NCTdarapladibplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation -
Ren, 2009   simvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias -
HARP, 1994    NCTvarious drugsplaceboExploratory negative-2%
OACIS-LIPID, 2008     pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias -
SCRIP, 1994    NCTvarious drugsusual careExploratory negative7%
JAPAN ACS, 2009      NCTpitavastatinatorvastatinacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory -
Post CABG (diabetic sub group), 1999     aggressive cholesterol-loweringmoderate cholesterol-loweringdiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias -
atorvastatin  
ASCOT (diabetics sub group), 2003   atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Exploratory negative-16%
CARDS, 2004      NCTatorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias conclusive-26%-37%
Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D), 2005   atorvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-5%-4%
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative-9%
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative2%-9%
ASCOT, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Low risk of bias conclusive-13%
MIRACL, 2001     atorvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-5%-8%
macin, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome squamous NSCLC Low risk of bias -
SALTIRE, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative
Mohler III, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
SPARCL, 2006      NCTatorvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting2%-18%
Strey, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboheart failure -
Mohler, 2003     atorvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias -
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative6%-3%
ASCOT (women subgroup) , 2003     AtorvastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative10%
Colivicchi, 2002     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-23%-43%
ESTABLISH, 2004     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-100%-100%
GREACE, 2002     atorvastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-43%
AVERT, 1999     atorvastatin high doseangioplastysecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-36%
TNT (diabetic sub group), 2006     atorvastatin high doseatorvastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting10%-23%
TNT, 2005            NCTatorvastatin high doseatorvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive 1%-21%
Vascular basis, 2005     atorvastatin high doselovastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
PROVE IT - TIMI 22, 2004     atorvastatinpravastatinacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-28%-24%
REVERSAL, 2004     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative
PROVE-IT, 2004         atorvastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting
SAGE, 2007     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-67%
IDEAL, 2005        NCTatorvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting -2%
bezafibrate  
SENDCAP, 1998     bezafibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Exploratory suggesting-100%
LEADER, 2002     bezafibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative5%-6%
LEADER trial, 2000   bezafibrateplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseLow risk of bias -
BECAIT, 1996     bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting∞%
BIP, 2000       bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative6%
cerivastatin  
Laufs, 2004     cerivastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias -
cholestyramine  
STARS (cholestyramine), 1992     cholestyraminecontrolLow risk of bias negative-100%
LRC, 1984   cholestyramineplaceboLow risk of bias negative-5%
NHLBI (Brensike), 1984    NCTcholestyramineplacebodiabeticExploratory negative-28%
clofibrate  
WHO clofibrate, 1978   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting 27%
Cullen, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
Harrold, 1969   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias -
Hanefeld, 1991   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative
Begg, 1971   clofibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-58%
Acheson, 1972   clofibrateplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory -
VA Neurology Section, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP Clofibrate, 1975   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
Scottish, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%
Newcastle, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-37%
SCOR, 1990     colestipol+clofibrateplacebodiabeticLow risk of bias negative-100%
colestipol  
UCS (Dorr), 1978   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-24%
Ryan, 1974   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Gundersen, 1976   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Ruoff, 1978   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
Gross, 1973   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
diet  
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
MRFIT, 1982   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Hjermann, 1981   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory -
WHO Collaborative, 1986   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-1%
Goteborg, 1986     dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Rose, 1965   dietusual dietExploratory negative285%
Singh, 1992   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992     dietusual dietExploratory negative-67%
Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias -
Ornish, 1990     dietusual dietExploratory negative∞%
Kallio, 1979   dietusual dietExploratory -
MRC Soya, 1968   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-12%
Woodhill, 1966   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative49%
Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966   dietusual dietRisk of bias suggesting-25%
MRC low fat, 1965   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-13%
WHI low fat, 2005    NCTdietusual dietExploratory negative-3%
Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986     dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-2%
Black, 1994     dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-51%
Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975   dietusual dietExploratory negative3%
Tuttle, 2008     low fat dietmediterranean-style dietRisk of bias -
estrogen  
Marmorstein, 1962   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
Stamler, 1963   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP estrogen 5, 1975   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP estrogen 2.5, 1975   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
VA Neurology Section (estrogen), 1966   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
VA drugs (Estrogen or thyroxine), 1968   estrogen or thyroxineplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-61%
etofibrate  
Emmerich, 2009     etofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
ezetimibe  
SHARP, 2010      NCTezetimibe+simvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting2%-13%
IMPROVE-IT, 2014      NCTezetimibeplacebo (on top statins) early initiation Low risk of bias conclusive-1%-6%
Enhance, 2008   ezetimibeplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias -
SANDS, 2008      NCTaggressive treatmentstandard teatmentdiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative35%
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010   ezetimibeniacinExploratory -
fenofibrate  
FIELD, 2005     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting10%-10%
DAIS, 2001     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative-32%
FIELD, 2005             fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias suggesting 10%-10%
ACCORD lipid, 2010    NCTfenofibrateplacebo (on top simvastatine)diabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative-9%-7%
fluvastatin  
LIPS (diabetic sub group), 2002     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
ALERT (diabetic sub group), 2003     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias -
FLARE (elderly subgroup), 1999       fluvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-65%
LIPS (elderly subgroup), 2002     fluvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-34%
LIPS (sub groups), 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-27%160%
FLORIDA, 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-34%-5%
LCAS, 1997     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-4%
Riegger et al., 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-52%
FLARE, 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-55%
BCAPS, 2001     fluvastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias negative1%
ALERT, 2003     fluvastatinplaceboCKD kidney diseases Low risk of bias suggesting4%
LIPS, 2002     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting-27%
ALERT, 2003     fluvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias negative4%-16%
HYRIM, 2005   fluvastatinplacebohypertensive hypertensive patients Exploratory negative-19%-26%
gemfibrozil  
Helsinki (HHS), 1987   gemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting2%
HHS (diabetic sub group), 1987   gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
VA-HIT (diabetic sub group), 1999     gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative-100%
VA-HIT, 1999      NCTgemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-10%-22%
HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993   gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative61%
LOCAT, 1997     gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative
lovastatin  
AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998     lovastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive4%
AFCAPS/TexCAPS (diabetic sub group), 1998     lovastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
CRISP 20mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
ACAPS, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory suggesting-88%
CCAIT, 1994   lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative1%
MARS, 1993      NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
Excel, 1991   lovastatinplaceboExploratory negative178%
Weintraub, 1994     lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative
CRISP 40mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
AFCAPS (women subgroup) , 1998       LovastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative57%-33%
Sahni, 1991   lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-21%
CLAPT, 1999     lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
niacin  
VA drugs, 1968   niacincontrolLow risk of bias negative3%
Carlson (Stockholm), 1977   clofibtate+niacinplacebosecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-26%
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
CDP niacin, 1975   niacinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-4%
AIM-HIGH, 2011      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative2%
HPS 2-Thrive      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative9%-4%
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009    NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory -
ARBITER 2, 2009   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory negative-61%
HATS, 2001   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative0%-60%
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009        NCTniacinezetimibeExploratory suggesting 2849%
policosanol  
Castano, 2001   policosanolcontroldiabeticLow risk of bias negative-100%
Más, 1999     policosanolcontrolExploratory negative-100%
Batista, 1996   policosanolcontrolLow risk of bias -
pravastatin  
MEGA, 2006        NCTpravastatincontrolprimary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-29%-25%
FAST Fukuoka pravastatin, 2002     pravastatincontrolprimary preventionExploratory -
WOSCOPS, 1995     pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%-42%
PROSPER diabetic (sub group), 2002     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative-20%
LIPID (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
CARE (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
WOSCOPS (diabetic sub group), 1996     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
PROSPER, 2002   pravastatinplacebosecondary prevention elderly Low risk of bias conclusive -2%-13%
CARE (elderly subgroup), 1998     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-28%
LIPID (elderly sub group), 2001     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-20%
PLAC I (elderly sub group), 1995     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-38%
REGRESS (elderly subgroup), 1995     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-16%
REGRESS, 1995       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-40%-41%
PMSG, 1993   pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionExploratory negative-100%
LIPID, 1998         pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%
CARE, 1996       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-8%
LAMIL, 1997   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
RECIFE, 1999     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PAIS, 2001   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-31%
CAIUS, 1996     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory negative53%
PREVEND IT, 2004     pravastatinplaceborelated disease kidney diseases Low risk of bias negative-13%
PLAC I, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-35%-12%
PLAC II, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-32%
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-36%
KAPS, 1995     pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionExploratory negative-25%-22%
PHYLLIS, 2004     pravastatinplacebodiabetic cerebral vascular disease hypertensive patients Exploratory -
PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention elderly Exploratory negative-2%
ALLHAT (women subgroup) , 2002     PravastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative-2%2%
MEGA (women subgroup) , 2006     PravastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting-42%-26%
GISSI P (diabetic sub group), 2000   pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory -
ALLHAT-LLT (diabetic sub group), 2002     pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory negative3%
ALLHAT, 2002      NCTpravastatinusual careat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Risk of bias negative-1%-9%
L-CAD, 2000     pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting-20%-20%
PTT, 2002   pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting
GISSI Prevenzione, 2000     pravastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-18%-12%
KLIS, 2000   pravastatinusual careprimary preventionRisk of bias -
PROVE IT TIMI 22 (diabetic sub group), 2006     pravastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias -
probucol  
FATS Fukosawa (probucol), 2002   probucolcontrolprimary preventionExploratory -
McCaughan, 1981   ProbucolplaceboExploratory -
Tardif, 1997     ProbucolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%
PQRST, 1994   probucolplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
PQRST, 1994   probucolplaceboExploratory -
rosuvastatin  
JUPITER (elderly sub group), 2009     rosuvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-20%-39%
JUPITER, 2008    NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive -20%-47%
ASTRONOMER, 2010   rosuvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias -
METEOR, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory negative∞%
CORONA, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-5%-6%
Krum, 2007     rosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-23%
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative 2%-2%
AURORA, 2009       rosuvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-4%-3%
HOPE 3, 2016      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-7%-24%
JUPITER (women subgroup) , 2008     RosuvastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting-23%-45%
simvastatin  
Hong, 2005     simvastatincontrolheart failureRisk of bias negative
SEAS, 2008    NCTezetimibe+simvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative
HPS (diabetic sub group), 2002   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting-19%
4S (diabetic sub group), 1999   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting-21%
HPS (diabetic primary prevention sub group), 2003     simvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
4S (elderly subgroup), 1997     simvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-32%
HPS (elderly subgroup), 2002     simvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-12%
HPS, 2002         simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-12%
4S, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-29%-26%
A to Z, 2004     simvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation negative-10%-11%
CIS, 1997     simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-76%
Mondillo, 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
Aronow , 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
MAAS, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-65%
Node, 2003     simvastatinplaceboheart failurenegative
HPS (post troke sub group), 2004     simvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting-21%
HPS (women subgroup) , 2002     SimvastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting
Landmesser, 2005     simvastatinezetimibeheart failure -
SEARCH, 2010    NCTsimvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting 0%-5%
thyroxine  
CDP tyroxine, 1975   thyroxineplaceboLow risk of bias -

diet  

not classified  
NORDIET     dietcontrol -
BARON   dietcontrol -
HPT     dietcontrol -
Kumanyika     dietcontrol -
TAIM   dietcontrol -
DISH     dietcontrol -
Lyon           Mediterranean dietcontrolsuggesting-60%-70%
PREDIMED (olive oil), 2013   Mediterranean diet with EOVVcontrolRisk of bias suggesting0%-30%
PREDIMED (nuts), 2013   Mediterranean diet with nutscontrolsuggesting2%-30%
DART (Burr), 1989     dietusual dietsecondary preventionExploratory negative
Finnish Mental Hospital (Turpeinen), 1979     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory negative
diet  
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
MRC Soya, 1968   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-12%
Woodhill, 1966   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative49%
Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966   dietusual dietRisk of bias suggesting-25%
Rose, 1965   dietusual dietExploratory negative285%
MRC low fat, 1965   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-13%
WHI low fat, 2005    NCTdietusual dietExploratory negative-3%
Singh, 1992   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992     dietusual dietExploratory negative-67%
Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias -
Ornish, 1990     dietusual dietExploratory negative∞%
Kallio, 1979   dietusual dietExploratory -
MRFIT, 1982   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Hjermann, 1981   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory -
WHO Collaborative, 1986   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-1%
Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986     dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-2%
Black, 1994     dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-51%
Goteborg, 1986     dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975   dietusual dietExploratory negative3%
Tuttle, 2008     low fat dietmediterranean-style dietRisk of bias -

dietary salt reduction  

not classified  
Kumanyika, 1993     sodium reductioncontrol -
DISH, 1985   sodium reductioncontrol -
Chang, 2006     sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias negative-3%-35%
HPT, 1990     sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias negative0%
Morgan, 1978     sodium reductioncontrolExploratory negative-4%-3%
Paterna, 2008     sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias - 159%
TOHP I, 1992                 sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias suggesting-36%
TOHP II, 1997             sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias negative-33%
TONE, 1998           sodium reductioncontrolRisk of bias negative-22%
Alli, 1992   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -
Arroll, 1995   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -
Costa, 1981   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -
Morgan, 1987   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -
Silman, 1993   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -
Thaler, 1982   sodium reductioncontrolExploratory -

direct factor Xa inhibitors  

rivaroxaban  
COMPASS (rivaroxaban alone), 2017    NCTrivaroxabanaspirinsecondary prevention -
COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017      NCTrivaroxaban + aspirinaspirinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias - 8100%

direct oral anticoagulant (DAO)  

rivaroxaban  
COMPASS (rivaroxaban alone), 2017    NCTrivaroxabanaspirinsecondary prevention -
COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017      NCTrivaroxaban + aspirinaspirinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias - 8100%

HDL increasing drugs  

not classified  
REVEAL HPS-3 TIMI-55, 2017    NCTanacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias remark
dal-VESSEL, 2011   dalcetrapibplaceboExploratory -
dal-OUTCOMES, 2012      NCTdalcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative-1%4%
ACCELERATE, 2017      NCTevacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-16%-3%
anacetrapib  
DEFINE, 2010    NCTanacetrapibplaceboExploratory negative38%-24%
REALIZE, 2015      NCTanacetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative
bezafibrate  
BECAIT, 1996     bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting∞%
BIP, 2000       bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative6%
SENDCAP, 1998     bezafibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Exploratory suggesting-100%
LEADER, 2002     bezafibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative5%-6%
clofibrate  
WHO clofibrate, 1978   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting 27%
CDP Clofibrate, 1975   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
Scottish, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%
Newcastle, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-37%
Harrold, 1969   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias -
Begg, 1971   clofibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-58%
Acheson, 1972   clofibrateplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory -
VA Neurology Section, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
Cullen, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
Hanefeld, 1991   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative
etofibrate  
Emmerich, 2009     etofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
fenofibrate  
FIELD, 2005             fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias suggesting 10%-10%
DAIS, 2001     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative-32%
ACCORD lipid, 2010    NCTfenofibrateplacebo (on top simvastatine)diabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative-9%-7%
gemfibrozil  
VA-HIT, 1999      NCTgemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-10%-22%
Helsinki (HHS), 1987   gemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting2%
HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993   gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative61%
LOCAT, 1997     gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative
niacin  
VA drugs, 1968   niacincontrolLow risk of bias negative3%
CDP niacin, 1975   niacinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-4%
AIM-HIGH, 2011      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative2%
HPS 2-Thrive      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative9%-4%
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009    NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory -
ARBITER 2, 2009   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory negative-61%
HATS, 2001   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative0%-60%
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009        NCTniacinezetimibeExploratory suggesting 2849%
torcetrapib  
RADIANCE 1, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboExploratory negative-100%
ILLUMINATE, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias negative 58%16%
RADIANCE 2, 2007     torcetrapibplaceboLow risk of bias -
ILLUSTRATE, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboExploratory negative35%

hormonal replacement therapy  

not classified  
PEPI, 1995    NCThormonal replacement therapyplaceboLow risk of bias -
estrogen  
WAVE, 2002      NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative78%-8%
EAGAR, 2006      NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative -46%55%
HERS, 1998          NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative 6%-1%
EVTET, 2000     combined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Hall, 1998     combined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%-25%
WHI, 2002       combined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative 1%19%
WHISP, 2006     combined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%-100%
WISDOM, 2007     combined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative 59%∞%
ERA (estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone), 2000      NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-50%68%
WELL-HART (estrogen-progestin), 2003      NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-23%16%
Schulman (NHLBI) (estrogen-progestogen), 2002      NCTcombined estrogen and progestogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
ERA (estrogen alone ), 2000        NCTestrogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative40%-2%
WELL-HART (estrogen alone), 2003      NCTestrogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-50%0%
Schulman (NHLBI) (estrogen alone), 2002      NCTestrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
EPAT, 2001     estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%50%
ESPRIT, 2002     estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative-19%
WEST, 2001     estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias negative14%-21%

lifestyle intervention  

not classified  
NORDIET     dietcontrol -
BARON   dietcontrol -
HPT     dietcontrol -
Kumanyika     dietcontrol -
TAIM   dietcontrol -
DISH     dietcontrol -
Lyon           Mediterranean dietcontrolsuggesting-60%-70%
PREDIMED (olive oil), 2013   Mediterranean diet with EOVVcontrolRisk of bias suggesting0%-30%
PREDIMED (nuts), 2013   Mediterranean diet with nutscontrolsuggesting2%-30%
CELL, 1995     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias negative89%
Family Heart, 1994     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolLow risk of bias suggesting
Göteborg Study, 1986     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias negative-2%
HDFP, 1979    NCTMultiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias suggesting-17%
Johns Hopkins, 1983     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias suggesting-55%
MRFIT, 1982    NCTMultiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias suggesting2%
Meland, 1997   Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolExploratory negative
OXCHECK, 1994     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias negative22%
Oslo, 1981     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias negative-31%
WHO Factories, 1982     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias suggesting-1%
Helsinki Businessmen Study, 1985     Multiple risk factor interventionscontrolRisk of bias negative99%
DART (Burr), 1989     dietusual dietsecondary preventionExploratory negative
Finnish Mental Hospital (Turpeinen), 1979     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory negative
diet  
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
MRC Soya, 1968   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-12%
Woodhill, 1966   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative49%
Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966   dietusual dietRisk of bias suggesting-25%
Rose, 1965   dietusual dietExploratory negative285%
MRC low fat, 1965   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-13%
WHI low fat, 2005    NCTdietusual dietExploratory negative-3%
Singh, 1992   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992     dietusual dietExploratory negative-67%
Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias -
Ornish, 1990     dietusual dietExploratory negative∞%
Kallio, 1979   dietusual dietExploratory -
MRFIT, 1982   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Hjermann, 1981   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory -
Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986     dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-2%
Black, 1994     dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-51%
Goteborg, 1986     dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975   dietusual dietExploratory negative3%
Tuttle, 2008     low fat dietmediterranean-style dietRisk of bias -

niacin  

not classified  
AFREGS, 2005     strategy to increase HDL cholesterolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-49%
niacin  
VA drugs, 1968   niacincontrolLow risk of bias negative3%
UCSF SCOR, 1990     niacin+colestipolcontrolExploratory negative-100%
Carlson (Stockholm), 1977   clofibtate+niacinplacebosecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-26%
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
CDP niacin, 1975   niacinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-4%
FATS, 1990     niacin+colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-78%
AIM-HIGH, 2011      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative2%
HPS 2-Thrive      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative9%-4%
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009    NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory -
ARBITER 2, 2009   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory negative-61%
HATS, 2001   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative0%-60%
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009        NCTniacinezetimibeExploratory suggesting 2849%
Guyton, 2008     niacin+ezetimibesimvastatin+ezetimibeLow risk of bias negative 2153%

omega-3 fatty acids  

not classified  
Bellamy, 1992   MaxEPAcontrolExploratory -
Dehmer, 1998   MaxEPAcontrolExploratory negative-41%
Kaul, 1992   MaxEPAcontrolExploratory negative-100%15%
OMEGA, 2009      NCTomega-3 Fatty acidscontrolRisk of bias negative 23%
Milner, 1989   Promegacontrol -
Natvig, 1968   alpha-linolenic acidplaceboLow risk of bias negative7%13%
ALPHA OMEGA (ALA), 2010    NCTalpha-linolenic acidplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%-8%
Veale, 1994     Efamol marineplaceboLow risk of bias -
Maresta, 2002     EsapentplaceboLow risk of bias negative15%
Sirtori, 1998     EsapentplaceboLow risk of bias -
Rossing, 1996   EskisolplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Hawthorne, 1992     HiEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Bairati, 1992   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Greenfield, 1993   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Lau, 1993   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Lau, 1995   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Nye, 1990   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Singh, 1997     MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-44%-44%
Skoldstam, 1992   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Thien, 1993   MaxEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
GISSI HF fatty acid, 2008    NCTomega-3 fatty acidsplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-6%-3%
ALPHA OMEGA (EPA DHA), 2010    NCTomega-3 Fatty acidsplaceboLow risk of bias negative1%1%
Risk and Prevention Study, 2013        NCTomega-3 Fatty acidsplaceboLow risk of bias negative4%5%
Bonnema, 1995   PikasolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Connor, 1993   PromegaplaceboLow risk of bias -
Sacks (HARP), 1995     PromegaplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%-5%
Belluzzi, 1996       PurEPAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Reis, 1991   Super EPAplaceboLow risk of bias - 58%
diet  
Burr (DART), 1989   dietcontrolsuggesting-29%-15%
Burr (DART 2), 2003   dietcontrolnegative 15%31%
Mate-Jimenez, 1991   dietcontrolExploratory -
fish oil  
Bemelmans, 2002       fish oilcontrolLow risk of bias negative332%
Brox, 2001   fish oilcontrolExploratory negative-100%-100%
Franzen, 1993   fish oilcontrolLow risk of bias -
Katan, 1997     fish oilcontrolExploratory -
Malaguarnera, 1999   fish oilcontrolExploratory negative-100%
Shimizu, 1995     fish oilcontrolExploratory -
Terano, 1999   fish oilcontrolExploratory negative
Almallah, 1998   fish oilplaceboExploratory -
Borchgrevink, 1966   fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias negative-29%18%
Dry, 1991   fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Geusens, 1994   fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Leaf, 1994     fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%-62%
Loeschke, 1996   fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Lorenz-Meyer, 1996   fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Sacks (TOHP 1), 1994    NCTfish oilplaceboLow risk of bias -
von Schacky, 1999     fish oilplaceboLow risk of bias negative-50%-35%
omacor  
Eritsland, 1996     Omacorcontrolnegative23%16%
GISSI-P, 1999       OmacorcontrolRisk of bias suggesting-14%-11%
Johansen, 1999     OmacorplaceboLow risk of bias negative-67%-67%
Nilsen, 2001     OmacorplaceboLow risk of bias negative0%4%

on top statins  

alirocumab  
ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias conclusive-15%-13%
evolocumab  
FOURIER, 2017      NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias conclusive4%-20%
ezetimibe  
IMPROVE-IT, 2014      NCTezetimibeplacebo (on top statins) early initiation Low risk of bias conclusive-1%-6%

PCSK9 Inhibitors  

alirocumab  
ODYSSEY OPTIONS I   alirocumabezetimibe (on top statin)negative
ODYSSEY OPTIONS II   alirocumabezetimibe (on top statin)negative
ODYSSEY MONO      NCTalirocumabezetimibe aloneLow risk of bias negative
ODYSSEY Long-Term, 2015      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Exploratory suggesting
ODYSSEY Alternative      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias negative
ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias conclusive-15%-13%
ODYSSEY FH 1      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias -
ODYSSEY FH 2      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias -
ODYSSEY HIGH FH      NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)negative
ODYSSEY COMBO        NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias negative
ODYSSEY COMBO II        NCTalirocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias negative
evolocumab  
MENDEl 2    NCTevolocumab -
Mendel 1, 2012      NCTevolocumab -
YUKAWA-1, 2014   evolocumab -
GAUSS 2    NCTevolocumabezetimibe alonenegative
GAUSS 1, 2012    NCTevolocumabplacebonegative
FOURIER, 2017      NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias conclusive4%-20%
DESCARTES, 2014    NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)negative
LAPLACE-TIMI 57    NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins) -
RUTHERFORD-1    NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)negative
LAPLACE 2, 2014    NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)negative
RUTHERFORD-2, 2015    NCTevolocumabplacebo (on top statins)negative

plasma homocysteine lowering intervention  

not classified  
NORVIT (vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006    NCTvit B6controlLow risk of bias negative16%11%
WENBIT (vit B6), 2008    NCTvit B6placeboLow risk of bias negative-6%10%
folic acid  
FOLARDA (Liem), 2004   folic acidcontrolExploratory negative-12%
GOES (Liem), 2003   folic acidcontrolRisk of bias negative-16%10%
NORVIT (folic acid + B12) (Bonaa), 2006    NCTfolic acid, B12controlLow risk of bias negative2%7%
NORVIT (folic acid, B12 and vit B6) (Bonaa), 2006    NCTfolic acid, vit B12 and vit B6controlLow risk of bias negative 18%18%
CHAOS-2, 2002   folic acidplaceboLow risk of bias negative
CSPPT, 2015      NCTfolic acidplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-6%-20%
SEARCH, 2007      NCTfolic acid, B12placeboLow risk of bias negative3%3%
WENBIT (folic ac,B12), 2008    NCTfolic acid, B12placeboLow risk of bias negative 28%30%
WAFACS, 2008    NCTfolic acid, vit B12 and vit B6placeboLow risk of bias negative-2%4%
HOPE-2 (Lonn), 2006        NCTfolic acid, vit B12 and vit B6placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-1%-5%
VITATOPS, 2010    NCTfolic acid, vit B12 and vit B6placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-9%
SU.FOL.OM3   folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6placeboLow risk of bias negative 62%-7%
VISP (Toole), 2004   high dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6low dose - folic acid, vit B12 and vit B6Low risk of bias negative-14%-3%

polypill  

not classified  
TIPS, 2009        NCTpolypillerrorLow risk of bias -

statins  

not classified  
DART (Burr), 1989     dietusual dietsecondary preventionExploratory negative
atorvastatin  
Mohler, 2003     atorvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias -
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative-9%
CARDS, 2004      NCTatorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias conclusive-26%-37%
ASCOT, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Low risk of bias conclusive-13%
GREACE, 2002     atorvastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-43%
AVERT, 1999     atorvastatin high doseangioplastysecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-36%
TNT, 2005            NCTatorvastatin high doseatorvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive 1%-21%
Vascular basis, 2005     atorvastatin high doselovastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
REVERSAL, 2004     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative
SAGE, 2007     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-67%
IDEAL, 2005        NCTatorvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting -2%
fluvastatin  
BCAPS, 2001     fluvastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias negative1%
LIPS, 2002     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting-27%
HYRIM, 2005   fluvastatinplacebohypertensive hypertensive patients Exploratory negative-19%-26%
LCAS, 1997     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-4%
Riegger et al., 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-52%
FLARE, 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-55%
lovastatin  
Weintraub, 1994     lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative
AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998     lovastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive4%
CCAIT, 1994   lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative1%
ACAPS, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory suggesting-88%
MARS, 1993      NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
CRISP 20mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
CRISP 40mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
Sahni, 1991   lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-21%
CLAPT, 1999     lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
pravastatin  
FAST Fukuoka pravastatin, 2002     pravastatincontrolprimary preventionExploratory -
MEGA, 2006        NCTpravastatincontrolprimary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-29%-25%
REGRESS, 1995       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-40%-41%
PROSPER, 2002   pravastatinplacebosecondary prevention elderly Low risk of bias conclusive -2%-13%
LIPID, 1998         pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%
CAIUS, 1996     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory negative53%
PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention elderly Exploratory negative-2%
PMSG, 1993   pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionExploratory negative-100%
WOSCOPS, 1995     pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%-42%
CARE, 1996       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-8%
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-36%
PHYLLIS, 2004     pravastatinplacebodiabetic cerebral vascular disease hypertensive patients Exploratory -
PLAC II, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-32%
PLAC I, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-35%-12%
KLIS, 2000   pravastatinusual careprimary preventionRisk of bias -
ALLHAT, 2002      NCTpravastatinusual careat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Risk of bias negative-1%-9%
GISSI Prevenzione, 2000     pravastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-18%-12%
rosuvastatin  
HOPE 3, 2016      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-7%-24%
METEOR, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory negative∞%
JUPITER, 2008    NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive -20%-47%
simvastatin  
CIS, 1997     simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-76%
HPS, 2002         simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-12%
MAAS, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-65%
HPS (diabetic primary prevention sub group), 2003     simvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
4S, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-29%-26%
SEARCH, 2010    NCTsimvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting 0%-5%

weight-loss drugs  

not classified  
RIO-North America 5mg, 2006      -
RIO-North America (20mg vs 5mg), 2006      -
RIO-diabetes, 2006      NCTLow risk of bias suggesting
STRADIVARIUS, 2008      NCTrimonabant placeboLow risk of bias -
rimonabant  
CRESCENDO, 2010      NCTrimonabantplaceboLow risk of bias negative
RIO europe 20mg, 2005     rimonabant 20mgplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
Rio-lipid 20 mg, 2005     rimonabant 20mgplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
RIO-North America 20 mg, 2006      NCTrimonabant 20mgplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
RIO europe 5mg, 2005     rimonabant 5mgplaceboLow risk of bias -
RIO europe (20 vs 5 mg), 2005   rimonabant 20mgrimonabant 5mg -