TrialResults-center.org
Search
Menu
Home
Search
Recent trials
Browse pathology
Browse treatment
About us
statins
systematic review
meta-analysis
network meta-analysis
Select
cardiovascular prevention
heart failure
percutaneous coronary intervention
All type of patient
Diabetic patients
uncoded clinical condition ***
primary prevention
patients with prior MI or with CHD
diet
pretreatment with statin
statins
statins high dose
atorvastatin
cerivastatin
fluvastatin
lovastatin
pravastatin
rosuvastatin
simvastatin
vs placebo or control
vs angioplasty
vs ezetimibe
vs statin
cerebral vascular disease
elderly
hypertensive patients
type 2 diabetes
Filter
hide ongoing
show ongoing
hide ongoing
all ROB
Show all trials
Show only trial at low risk of bias
Hide exploratory trials
all results
Show all trials
Show only trial with conclusive result
Group by
Group by...
nothing
pathology
treatment
patient
comparator
classe
classe comparator
mechanism
clinical condition
MA
in first
nothing
pathology
treatment
patient
comparator
classe
classe comparator
mechanism
clinical condition
in second
nothing
pathology
treatment
patient
comparator
classe
classe comparator
mechanism
clinical condition
in third
Description
Synopsis
Comparison
Treatments
Patients
Characteristics
Method
Risk of bias
References
None
Tools
Indexation
Results
Global trial result
Main results
All results
All result tag
NCT results
All cause death (59)
stroke (fatal and non fatal) (33)
Coronary death (30)
Non fatal MI (29)
Coronary event (28)
non cardiovascular death (27)
Cardiovascular death (25)
Rhabdomyolysis (23)
cardiovascular events (20)
Coronary death and non fatal MI (18)
MACE (17)
cardiac death (14)
Fatal stroke (14)
new-onset diabetes (14)
Death from cancer (11)
Myopathy (10)
Haemmorhagic stroke (9)
Adverse events (6)
Revascularization (5)
Fatal MI (2)
Non vascular death (2)
MI (CK-MB >3x ULN at 6 and 12 hours after PCI) (1)
MI (troponin I >3x ULN at 6 and 12 hours after PCI) (1)
Venous thromboembolism (1)
Cancer (1)
Non fatal stroke (1)
myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) (1)
Options
Numeric
bar chart
forest plot
medians
Trial
Studied trt
Control trt
patients
tags
ROB
Trial result
All cause death
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
cardiovascular prevention
atorvastatin
Mohler, 2003
atorvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
-
ASCOT, 2003
atorvastatin
placebo
at risk hypertensive
hypertensive patients
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-13%
-27%
ASPEN, 2006
atorvastatin
placebo
diabetic
type 2 diabetes
Low risk of bias
negative
-11%
CARDS, 2004
NCT
atorvastatin
placebo
diabetic
type 2 diabetes
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-26%
-47%
GREACE, 2002
atorvastatin
usual care
secondary prevention
Risk of bias
suggesting
-43%
-47%
AVERT, 1999
atorvastatin high dose
angioplasty
secondary prevention
Risk of bias
negative
TNT, 2005
NCT
atorvastatin high dose
atorvastatin
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
1%
-24%
Vascular basis, 2005
atorvastatin high dose
lovastatin
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
∞%
-48%
SAGE, 2007
atorvastatin high dose
pravastatin
secondary prevention
Exploratory
suggesting
-67%
-67%
REVERSAL, 2004
atorvastatin high dose
pravastatin
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
0%
IDEAL, 2005
NCT
atorvastatin high dose
simvastatin
secondary prevention
Risk of bias
suggesting
-2%
-13%
fluvastatin
FLARE, 1999
fluvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-55%
LCAS, 1997
fluvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-4%
HYRIM, 2005
fluvastatin
placebo
hypertensive
hypertensive patients
Exploratory
negative
-19%
Riegger et al., 1999
fluvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
negative
-52%
BCAPS, 2001
fluvastatin
placebo
primary prevention
cerebral vascular disease
Low risk of bias
negative
1%
LIPS, 2002
fluvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
suggesting
-27%
lovastatin
Weintraub, 1994
lovastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
negative
CRISP 40mg, 1994
NCT
lovastatin
placebo
diabetic
Exploratory
-
CRISP 20mg, 1994
NCT
lovastatin
placebo
diabetic
Exploratory
-
ACAPS, 1994
NCT
lovastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
cerebral vascular disease
Exploratory
suggesting
-88%
-100%
MARS, 1993
NCT
lovastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
∞%
CCAIT, 1994
lovastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
1%
AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998
lovastatin
placebo
primary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
4%
-18%
CLAPT, 1999
lovastatin
usual care
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-100%
Sahni, 1991
lovastatin
usual care
secondary prevention
Risk of bias
negative
-21%
pravastatin
FAST Fukuoka pravastatin, 2002
pravastatin
control
primary prevention
Exploratory
-
MEGA, 2006
NCT
pravastatin
control
primary prevention
Risk of bias
suggesting
-29%
-17%
WOSCOPS, 1995
pravastatin
placebo
primary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-22%
-10%
REGRESS, 1995
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
suggesting
-40%
PLAC II, 1995
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
LIPID, 1998
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-22%
-17%
CARE, 1996
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-8%
-31%
PACT, 2004
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
negative
-36%
PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002
pravastatin
placebo
primary prevention
elderly
Exploratory
negative
-2%
3%
CAIUS, 1996
pravastatin
placebo
primary prevention
cerebral vascular disease
Exploratory
negative
PROSPER, 2002
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
elderly
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-2%
4%
PHYLLIS, 2004
pravastatin
placebo
diabetic
cerebral vascular disease
hypertensive patients
Exploratory
-
PMSG, 1993
pravastatin
placebo
primary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-100%
PLAC I, 1995
pravastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
suggesting
-35%
-100%
KLIS, 2000
pravastatin
usual care
primary prevention
Risk of bias
-
GISSI Prevenzione, 2000
pravastatin
usual care
secondary prevention
Risk of bias
negative
-18%
5%
ALLHAT, 2002
NCT
pravastatin
usual care
at risk hypertensive
hypertensive patients
Risk of bias
negative
-1%
-9%
rosuvastatin
HOPE 3, 2016
NCT
rosuvastatin
placebo
primary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-7%
-30%
METEOR, 2007
NCT
rosuvastatin
placebo
diabetic
Exploratory
negative
∞%
JUPITER, 2008
NCT
rosuvastatin
placebo
primary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-20%
-48%
simvastatin
4S, 1994
simvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-29%
-29%
MAAS, 1994
simvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-65%
CIS, 1997
simvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Exploratory
negative
-76%
HPS (diabetic primary prevention sub group), 2003
simvastatin
placebo
diabetic
type 2 diabetes
Exploratory
-
HPS, 2002
simvastatin
placebo
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
conclusive
-12%
-24%
SEARCH, 2010
NCT
simvastatin high dose
simvastatin
secondary prevention
Low risk of bias
suggesting
0%
-9%
heart failure
atorvastatin
Yamada, 2007
atorvastatin
control
heart failure
negative
-100%
Wojnicz, 2006
atorvastatin
control
heart failure
negative
Strey, 2005
atorvastatin
placebo
heart failure
-
Sola, 2006
atorvastatin
placebo
heart failure
Low risk of bias
negative
0%
cerivastatin
Laufs, 2004
cerivastatin
placebo
heart failure
Low risk of bias
-
rosuvastatin
CORONA, 2007
NCT
rosuvastatin
placebo
heart failure
Low risk of bias
negative
-5%
Krum, 2007
rosuvastatin
placebo
heart failure
Low risk of bias
negative
-23%
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008
NCT
rosuvastatin
placebo
heart failure
Low risk of bias
negative
2%
24%
simvastatin
Hong, 2005
simvastatin
control
heart failure
Risk of bias
negative
Node, 2003
simvastatin
placebo
heart failure
negative
Landmesser, 2005
simvastatin
ezetimibe
heart failure
-
percutaneous coronary intervention
atorvastatin
NAPLES II (Briguori), 2009
atorvastatin
control
suggesting
ARMYDA, 2004
atorvastatin
placebo
Low risk of bias
suggesting
-71%
ARMYDA-RECAPTURE, 2009
atorvastatin reload
placebo
Low risk of bias
suggesting
-100%
GAIN, 2001
atorvastatin
usual care
negative
∞%
fluvastatin
FLARE, 1999
fluvastatin
placebo
Low risk of bias
negative
-55%
LIPS, 2002
fluvastatin
placebo
Low risk of bias
negative
-27%
97%
pravastatin
PREDICT, 1997
pravastatin
placebo
Low risk of bias
negative
301%
∞%
×
Modal title