advanced breast cancer (metastatic) | versus different AI No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Chia, 2008 | exemestane vs fulvestrant | | | Clinical benefit (assessable) 1.02 [0.80; 1.31] Objective response (assessable) 1.11 [0.60; 2.05] diarrhoea 0.86 [0.37; 1.95] nausea 1.15 [0.68; 1.96] progression-free survival (reported or calculated) 1.04 [0.52; 2.07] Objective response (randomised) 1.08 [0.58; 2.01] Clinical benefit (randomised) 1.00 [0.77; 1.29] hot flushes 1.29 [0.83; 2.02] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Chia, 2008 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
advanced breast cancer (metastatic) | versus estrogen receptor antagonist No demonstrated result for efficacy exemestane inferior to tamoxifen in terms of Objective response (assessable) in Paridaens, 2003 exemestane inferior to tamoxifen in terms of Objective response (randomised) in Paridaens, 2003 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Paridaens, 2003 | exemestane vs tamoxifen | | Objective response (assessable) 0.39 [0.21; 0.74] Objective response (randomised) 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] | Clinical benefit (assessable) 0.70 [0.49; 1.00] nausea 0.63 [0.36; 1.13] Clinical benefit (randomised) 0.74 [0.51; 1.07] arthralgia 1.74 [0.69; 4.42] hot flushes 0.79 [0.52; 1.18] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Paridaens, 2003 | exemestane (n=-9) vs. tamoxifen (n=-9) | first-line hormone therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
advanced breast cancer (metastatic) | versus X No demonstrated result for efficacy exemestane inferior to megestrol acetate in terms of vomiting in Kaufmann, 2000 exemestane inferior to megestrol acetate in terms of nausea in Kaufmann, 2000 exemestane inferior to megestrol acetate in terms of hot flushes in Kaufmann, 2000 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Kaufmann, 2000 | exemestane vs megestrol acetate | | vomiting 3.72 [1.03; 13.43] nausea 1.84 [1.08; 3.15] hot flushes 2.51 [1.51; 4.17] | Clinical benefit (assessable) 0.93 [0.77; 1.13] Objective response (assessable) 0.84 [0.59; 1.19] overall survival (reported or calculated) 0.85 [0.49; 1.48] progression-free survival (reported or calculated) 0.82 [0.46; 1.45] Objective response (randomised) 0.83 [0.58; 1.18] Clinical benefit (randomised) 0.92 [0.76; 1.12] rash ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Kaufmann, 2000 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|