Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Aschner, 2006 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.96 [0.40; 2.31] |
Goldstein, 2007 | sitagliptin vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.74 [0.32; 1.71] |
Hanefeld, 2007 | sitagliptin vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 1.01 [0.39; 2.59] |
Nonaka, 2008 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Raz, 2006 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Scott* (sit vs pbo), 2007 | sitagliptin 50mg bid monotherapy vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 3.07 [0.32; 29.15] |
Charbonnel, 2006 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on MET) | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 1.34 [0.60; 2.98] |
Hermansen, 2007 | sitagliptin vs placebo (on-top glimepiride+/- metformine) | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 2.74 [0.29; 25.95] |
Nauck, 2007 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on MET) | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.76 [0.40; 1.44] |
Rosenstock (sit on top pio vs pbo), 2006 | sitagliptin vs placebo (on top PIO) | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 5.59 [1.26; 24.88] | | |
Scott** (sit vs pbo on top met), 2007 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on MET) | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 3.87 [0.44; 33.99] |
Barzilai, 2011 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | |
Vilsbøll, 2010 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on insulin+/-MET) | | | |
Mohan , 2009 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | |
Chan, 2008 | sitagliptin monotherapy vs placebo | | | |
raz, 2008 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on MET) | | | |
Rosenstock , 2006 | sitagliptin vs placebo (add on PIO) | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Aschner, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 or 200 mg dailym (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Goldstein, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Hanefeld, 2007 | sitagliptin 25 mg or 50 mg or 100 mg dailyi (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Nonaka, 2008 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily monotherapy (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Raz, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg (or 200 mg) daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Scott* (sit vs pbo), 2007 | sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Charbonnel, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on tometformin therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Hermansen, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to ongoing stable doses of glimepiride, alone or in combination with metformin)ocumen (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to ongoing stable doses of glimepiride, alone or in combination with metformin); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Nauck, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to metformin therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rosenstock (sit on top pio vs pbo), 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to pioglitazone therapy)sl˜ðõØ (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to pioglitazone therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Scott** (sit vs pbo on top met), 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to metformin therapy). (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately on mET monotherapy | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Barzilai, 2011 | once-daily sitagliptin (100 or 50 mg, depending on renal function) (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | elderly patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Vilsbøll, 2010 | once-daily sitagliptin 100 mg (n=322) vs. placebo (n=319) | patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on long-acting, intermediate-acting or premixed insulin | double-blind Sample size: 322/319 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Mohan , 2009 | sitagliptin 100mg once daily monotherapy (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | Chinese, Indian, and Korean patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise. | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 18 weeks |
Chan, 2008 | sitagliptin (n=65) vs. placebo (n=26) | patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency | double-blind Sample size: 65/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
raz, 2008 | sitagliptin 100 mg once daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rosenstock , 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg once daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |