pathology | treatment | patient | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
diabetes type 2 | captopril | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
UKPDS 38, 1998 | captopril or atenolol vs control | Stroke 0.58 [0.37; 0.90] microvascular events 0.65 [0.46; 0.91] | | All deaths 0.83 [0.65; 1.06] Fatal and nonfatal MI 0.80 [0.60; 1.05] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
UKPDS 38, 1998 | tight control of blood pressure aiming at a BP <150/85 (with the use of captopril or atenolol as main treatment, other treatment were added if the control criteria were not met) (n=758) vs. less tight control aiming at a blood pressure of <180/105 (avoiding treatment with ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers) (n=390)
| hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 758/390 Primary endpoint: not unique (3) FU duration: 8.4y (median)
|
|
diabetes type 2 | captopril | not classified | versus beta-blockers No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
UKPDS 39, 1998 | captopril vs atenolol | | | All deaths 1.14 [0.83; 1.55] Stroke 1.38 [0.74; 2.57] Fatal and nonfatal MI 1.19 [0.83; 1.69] microvascular events 1.28 [0.81; 2.03] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
UKPDS 39, 1998 | captopril 25 mg/d aiming at a BP <150/85 (n=400) vs. atenolol 50mg/d aiming at a BP <150/85 (n=358) | hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 400/358 Primary endpoint: not unique (3) FU duration: ND |
|
diabetes type 2 | captopril | not classified | versus diuretic and/or beta-blocker No demonstrated result for efficacy captopril inferior to diuretic and/or beta-blockers in terms of Fatal and nonfatal MI in CAPP (diabetic subgroup), 1999 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CAPP (diabetic subgroup), 1999 | captopril vs diuretic and/or beta-blockers | All deaths 0.54 [0.31; 0.95] Cardiovascular events 0.59 [0.38; 0.91] | Fatal and nonfatal MI 0.38 [0.20; 0.73] | Cardiovascular death 0.48 [0.21; 1.10] Stroke 1.03 [0.57; 1.85] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CAPP (diabetic subgroup), 1999 | Captopril initial dose of 50 mg daily given in one or two doses (n=309) vs. thiazide diuretic or beta-blocker (n=263) | Patients aged 25-66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions; subgroup of diabetic patients | open with blinded assessment Parallel groups Sample size: 309/263 Primary endpoint: CV events FU duration: 6.1 year |
|
diabetes type 2 | irbesartan | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
IPDM (150mg), 2001 | irbesartan vs placebo | microvascular events 0.30 [0.14; 0.64] | | | IDNT (irbesartan vs pbo), 2001 | irbesartan vs placebo | microvascular events 0.80 [0.66; 0.97] | | All deaths 0.92 [0.69; 1.23] Cardiovascular events 0.91 [0.72; 1.15] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
IPDM (150mg), 2001 | irbesartan 150 mg daily (n=195) vs. placebo (n=201) 3 arms trial: irbesartan 150 and 300 mg daily, placebo | hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 195/201 Primary endpoint: diabetic nephropathy FU duration: 2 years | IDNT (irbesartan vs pbo), 2001 | Irbesartan 300 mg daily (n=579) vs. placebo (n=569)
| hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 579/569 Primary endpoint: renal death FU duration: 2.6 years
|
|
diabetes type 2 | irbesartan | not classified | versus calcium-channel blockers No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
IDNT (irbesartan vs amlodipine), 2001 | irbesartan vs amlodipine | microvascular events 0.77 [0.63; 0.94] | | All deaths 1.04 [0.77; 1.40] Cardiovascular events 1.03 [0.81; 1.31] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
IDNT (irbesartan vs amlodipine), 2001 | Irbesartan 300 mg daily (n=579) vs. amlodipine 10 mg daily (n=567)
| hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 579/567 Primary endpoint: renal death FU duration: 2.6 years
|
|
diabetes type 2 | lisinopril | not classified | versus diuretics No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ALLHAT (lisi vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 | lisinopril vs chlorthalidone | | | All deaths 0.99 [0.89; 1.10] Stroke 1.06 [0.89; 1.26] Fatal and nonfatal MI 1.03 [0.94; 1.13] Cardiovascular events 1.07 [0.99; 1.15] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ALLHAT (lisi vs chlor, diabetic subgroup), 2002 | lisinopril 10 to 40 mg/d (n=2431) vs. chlorthalidone 12.5 to 25 mg/d (n=4498) | diabetic (subgroup) participants aged 55 years or older with hypertension | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2431/4498 Primary endpoint: fatal CHD or nonfatal MI FU duration: 4.9 y |
|
diabetes type 2 | losartan | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
RENAAL, 2001 | losartan vs placebo | microvascular events 0.79 [0.66; 0.95] | | All deaths 1.02 [0.80; 1.30] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
RENAAL, 2001 | losartan 50 to 100 mg once daily (n=751) vs. placebo (n=762) | patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 751/762 Primary endpoint: doubling of the creatinine, end-stage renal disease, death FU duration: 3.4 y |
|
diabetes type 2 | olmesartan | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy olmesartan inferior to placebo in terms of CV death in ROADMAP, 2010 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ROADMAP, 2010 | olmesartan vs placebo | onset of microalbuminuria 0.77 [0.63; 0.94] | CV death 4.96 [1.44; 17.12] | all cause death 1.72 [0.91; 3.24] non fatal stroke 1.74 [0.73; 4.13] non fatal MI 0.65 [0.35; 1.19] CV events 0.88 [0.63; 1.23] | ORIENT | olmesartan vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.96 [0.52; 1.75] CV death 3.36 [0.93; 12.07] non fatal stroke 0.73 [0.30; 1.79] non fatal MI 0.43 [0.11; 1.65] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ROADMAP, 2010 | olmesartan at 40 mg/day (n=2232) vs. placebo (n=2215) | patients with diabetes and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor, but no evidence of renal dysfunction | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2232/2215 Primary endpoint: microalbuminuria FU duration: 3.2 y | ORIENT | olmesartan (n=282) vs. placebo (n=284) | patients with diabetic Nephropathy and overt proteinuria secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 282/284 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|