mechanism | treatment | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
antithrombotics | Certoparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Certoparin-Study Group sub group, 1998 | Certoparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Certoparin-Study Group sub group, 1998 | Certoparin, 8000 IU twice daily, 14 days (n=39) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 20 IU/kg per hour (n=41) | Symptomatic PE sub group of patients with PE in a trial initially enrolling with acute deep vein thrombosis | open Parallel groups Sample size: 39/41 Primary endpoint: phlebographic Marder score FU duration: 6 mo |
|
antithrombotics | dalteparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Kuijer, 1995 | Dalteparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Meyer, 1995 | Dalteparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Kuijer, 1995 | Dalteparin, 120 IU/kg twice daily, 5 days (n=32) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 1250 IU/h (n=35) | Symptomatic PE | open Parallel groups Sample size: 32/35 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 mo | Meyer, 1995 | Dalteparin, 120 IU/kg twice daily, 10 days (n=29) vs. Unfractioned heparin: no bolus, infusion 500 IU/kg per day (n=31) | Symptomatic PE | open Parallel groups Sample size: 29/31 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 mo |
|
antithrombotics | enoxaparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PREPIC, 1998 | Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.33 [0.04; 2.84] | Merli sub group, 2001 | Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.66 [0.11; 3.90] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PREPIC, 1998 | Enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg twice daily, 8-12 days (n=41) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 500 IU/kg per day (n=54) factorial design comparing vena caval filters and enoxaparin | patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis who were at risk for pulmonary embolism | open Factorial plan Sample size: 41/54 Primary endpoint: recurrent VTE, death, and major bleeding FU duration: 2 y | Merli sub group, 2001 | Enoxaparin, 1mg/kg twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg once daily, 5 days (n=199) vs. Unfractioned heparin: according nomogram at local institution (n=88) | patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism sub group of a trial initially enrolling patients with symptomatic lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis | open Parallel groups Sample size: 199/88 Primary endpoint: none defined FU duration: 3 mo |
|
antithrombotics | nadroparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
European multicentre study, 1991 | Nadroparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.77 [0.05; 12.00] | Prandoni sub-group, 1992 | Nadroparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.34 [0.04; 3.15] | Thery, 1992 | Nadroparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
European multicentre study, 1991 | Nadroparin, 4750–6650 antifactor Xa IU twice daily, 10 days (n=61) vs. Unfractioned heparin: no bolus, infusion, 20 IU/kg per hour (n=47) | Symptomatic proximal DVT | open (blind assessment) Parallel groups Sample size: 61/47 Primary endpoint: Arnesen and Marder phlebographic scores FU duration: 3 mo | Prandoni sub-group, 1992 | Nadroparin, 4750–6650 antifactor Xa IU twice daily, 10 days (n=45) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 100 IU/kg, infusion 35 000 IU/d (n=46) | Symptomatic proximal DVT sub group of a trial initially including patients with acute symptomatic VTE | open Parallel groups Sample size: 45/46 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 mo | Thery, 1992 | Nadroparin, 76 IU/kg twice daily, 14 days (n=35) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 50 IU/kg, infusion 600 IU/kg per day (n=33) | patients with submassive pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 35/33 Primary endpoint: pulmonary vascular obstruction FU duration: 14 d dose-finding study |
|
antithrombotics | reviparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
COLOMBUS sub group, 1997 | Reviparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.96 [0.29; 3.25] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
COLOMBUS sub group, 1997 | Reviparin, 3500–6300 IU twice daily, 5 days (n=138) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 1250 IU/h (n=133) | patients with symptomatic DVT and associated pulmonary embolism sub of of a trial initially enrolling patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 138/133 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 mo |
|
antithrombotics | tinzaparin | versus unfractioned heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ACTSG (Hull) sub-group, 1992 | Tinzaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | THESEE, 1997 | Tinzaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment 1.53 [0.26; 9.09] | Campbell, 1998 | Tinzaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at the end of treatment NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ACTSG (Hull) sub-group, 1992 | Tinzaparin, 175 IU/kg once daily, 6 days (n=97) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 29 760–40 320 IU/d (n=103) | patients with objectively documented PE and underlying proximal deep vein thrombosi sub group of patients with objectively documented PE in a trial enrolling patients with proximal-vein thrombosis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 97/103 Primary endpoint: none defined FU duration: 3mo | THESEE, 1997 | Tinzaparin, 175 IU/kg once daily, 5 days (n=301) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 50 IU/kg, infusion 500 IU/kg per day (n=307) | patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 301/307 Primary endpoint: recurrent thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death FU duration: 3 mo | Campbell, 1998 | Tinzaparin, 175 IU/kg once daily, 5 days (n=6) vs. Unfractioned heparin: bolus 5000 IU, infusion 1400 IU/h (n=10) | Symptomatic PE | open Parallel groups Sample size: 6/10 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 mo |
|
fibrinolysis | candesartan | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Tebbe, 2009 | desmoteplase vs alteplase | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Tebbe, 2009 | 125, 180, and 250 microg/kg bodyweight desmoteplase (n=34) vs. 100 mg alteplase (n=0) | acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism | NA Parallel groups Sample size: 34/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
fibrinolysis | rt-PA | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy rt-PA inferior to placebo in terms of minor bleeding in Levine, 1990 | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PIOPED, 1990 | rt-PA vs placebo | | | All cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Levine, 1990 | rt-PA vs placebo | | minor bleeding 11.36 [1.61; 80.39] | All cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] recurrence of pulmonary embolism NaN [NaN; NaN] | PAIMS 2, 1992 | rt-PA vs no fibrinolysis | | | All cause death 1.60 [0.16; 16.10] major bleeding 1.20 [0.23; 6.34] minor bleeding 2.20 [0.86; 5.61] recurrence of pulmonary embolism 0.40 [0.04; 4.02] | Goldhaber, 1993 | rt-PA vs no fibrinolysis | | | All cause death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] major bleeding 3.59 [0.39; 33.33] recurrence of pulmonary embolism 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Konstantinides, 2002 | rt-PA vs placebo | | | All cause death 1.56 [0.36; 6.83] major bleeding 0.23 [0.03; 1.97] recurrence of pulmonary embolism 1.17 [0.30; 4.57] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PIOPED, 1990 | rt-PA 40–80 mg IV over 90 min plus heparin (n=9) vs. placebo+heparin (n=4) | patients with acute pulmonary embolism | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9/4 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days | Levine, 1990 | rt-PA 0.6 mg/kg IV over 2 min and heparin, initial bolus of 5000 U, then 30,000 U for first 24 hr continuous infusion,only interrupted for the duration of the study drug infusion (n=33) vs. placebo + heparin bolus of 5000 U, then 30,000 U for first 24 hr continuous infusion (n=25) | patients with objectively established acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 33/25 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 10 days | PAIMS 2, 1992 | rt-PA 100 mg IV over 2 h and heparin (n=-9) vs. Heparin 1750 IU/hr i.v. for 7 to 10 days (n=-9) | patients with angiographically documented pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days | Goldhaber, 1993 | rt-PA 100 mg IV over 2 h then 1000 U/hr heparin,when PTT or TT was < 2 times control. Subsequent heparin dose achieved PTT = 1.5 to 2.5 times the upperlimit of normal. (n=46) vs. heparin, initial dose 5000 U bolus followed by 1000 U/hr continuous i.v., 4 hr after the dose of heparin according to PTT. Target PTT = 1.5 to 2.5 times of normal (n=55) | haemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 46/55 Primary endpoint: Right-ventricular wall motion FU duration: 14 days | Konstantinides, 2002 | 100 mg alteplase given as 10 mg bolus followed by 90 mg i.v. infusion over 2 hours then i.v. heparin 1000 U/hr adjusted to maintain APTT of 2.0 to 2.5times the upper normal limit. Oral anticoagulation was started on day 3 (n=118) vs. placebo + i.v. heparin 1000 U/hr adjusted to maintain APTT of 2.0 to 2.5times the upper normal limit. Oral anticoagulation was started on day 3 (n=138) | patients with acute pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertensionor right ventricular dysfunction but withoutarterial hypotension or shock | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 118/138 Primary endpoint: in-hospital death or clinical deterioration FU duration: <30 days |
|
fibrinolysis | streptokinase | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Tibbutt, 1974 | streptokinase vs no fibrinolysis | | | All cause death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] major bleeding 1.31 [0.09; 19.00] minor bleeding 0.33 [0.04; 2.59] | Ly, 1978 | streptokinase vs no fibrinolysis | | | All cause death 0.39 [0.04; 3.79] major bleeding 1.57 [0.35; 7.06] minor bleeding 0.98 [0.34; 2.81] | Jerjes-Sanchez, 1995 | streptokinase vs no fibrinolysis | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Tibbutt, 1974 | intrapulmonary SK 600,000-U bolus, then 100,000 U/h for 72 h and intrapulmonary heparin (n=17) vs. 5000U heparin plus 100mg hydrocortisone infused over 30 mins through pulmonary artery catheter. Followed by 2500 U for 72 hr (n=13) | life-threatening pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 17/13 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 days | Ly, 1978 | streptokinase 250,000-U bolus, then 100,000 U/h for 72 h and heparin (n=14) vs. Heparin 15,000 IU initial dose i.v. followed by 30,000 IU/day continuous i.v., adjusted by TT (n=11) | patients with major pulmonary embolism verified by angiography | open Parallel groups Sample size: 14/11 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 10 days | Jerjes-Sanchez, 1995 | streptokinase 1,500,000 U IV over 1 h and heparin (n=43) vs. heparin alone (n=5) | high clinical suspicion for massive pulmonary embolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 43/5 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 days |
|
fibrinolysis | urokinase | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
UPET, 1973 | urokinase vs placebo | | | All cause death 0.82 [0.29; 2.32] major bleeding 1.90 [0.99; 3.66] minor bleeding 1.43 [0.68; 2.98] recurrence of pulmonary embolism 0.76 [0.38; 1.52] | Marini, 1988 | urokinase vs no fibrinolysis | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
UPET, 1973 | urokinase 2,000-U/lb bolus, then 2,000 U/lb per h IV for 12 h and heparin (n=82) vs. placebo + Heparin (a loading dose of 75 U/pound, then 10 U/pound/hr for 12 hr infusion, then heparin for a minimum of 5 days, followed by heparin or warfarin therapy for a total of 14 days) (n=78) | patients with pulmonary embolism | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 82/78 Primary endpoint: FU duration: <14 days | Marini, 1988 | urokinase 800,000 U/d IV for 72 h, UK 3,300,000 U IV for 12 h and heparin (n=20) vs. heparin (n=10) | patients with pulmonary embolism | open Sample size: 20/10 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days |
|