mechanism | treatment | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | captopril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy captopril inferior to placebo in terms of Death in ISIS-4, 1995 | 14 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS-4, 1995 | captopril vs placebo | | Death 0.94 [0.88; 0.99] | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril or enalapril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | | captopril vs placebo | | | | Bussmann, 1992 | captopril vs placebo | | | | Di Pasquale, 1994 | captopril vs placebo | | | | Di Pasquale, 1997 | captopril vs placebo | | | | Galcera, 1993 | captopril vs placebo | | | | Hargreaves, 1992 | captopril vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS-4, 1995 | captopril 6.25mg twice daily initialy titrated up to 50 mg twice daily (for 1 month) (n=29028) vs. placebo (n=29022) | Acute MI <24h of MI, no cardiogenic shock or persistent severe hypotension | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 29028/29022 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: 1 month | CCS-1, 1995 | captopril6.25 mg initial dose, 12.5 mg 2 h later, and then 12.5 mg three times daily for 28 days (n=13634) vs. placebo (n=0) | Acute MI <36h of MI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 13634/0 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: 1 month | French, 1999 | captopril 6.25 mg, increasing to 50 mg t.d.s. (n=243) vs. placebo (n=250) | patients aged < or = 75 years with first infarctions, presenting within 4 h of symptom onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 243/250 Primary endpoint: regional wall motion FU duration: 1 year | CATS, 1996 | captopril 25 mg three times a day (n=149) vs. placebo (n=149) | patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase within 6h of onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 149/149 Primary endpoint: left ventricular volume index FU duration: 1 year | PRACTICAL (captopril), 1994 | captopril 25 mg three times daily or enalapril 5 mg three times daily (n=150) vs. placebo (n=75) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 150/75 Primary endpoint: LV function FU duration: 1 year | ECCE, 1997 | captopril titrated dose in order to preserve their blood pressure (n=104) vs. placebo (n=104) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 104/104 Primary endpoint: exercise testing FU duration: 1 month | Sharpe, 1991 | captopril 50 mg twice daily (n=100) vs. placebo (n=0) | patients with Q wave myocardial infarction, but without clinical heart failure 24-48h after onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 100/0 Primary endpoint: Left ventricular volumes FU duration: 3 months | Ray, 1993 | captopril 25 mg three times a day (n=99) vs. placebo (n=0) | haemodynamically stable patients with acute myocardial infarction, selected on clinical grounds as being at risk of late ventricular dilatation | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 99/0 Primary endpoint: none FU duration: 1 year | Nabel, 1991 | intravenous followed by oral captopril (n=20) vs. placebo (n=18) | patients with myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 20/18 Primary endpoint: none FU duration: 3 months | Bussmann, 1992 | slow intravenous bolus injection of 2.5 or 5.0 mg captopril followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5-2.0 mg/h for a period of 48 hours (n=22) vs. placebo (n=24) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 22/24 Primary endpoint: QRS complexes FU duration: 48h | Di Pasquale, 1994 | captopril, 6.25 mg, orally 15 min before thrombolysis (n=188) vs. placebo before thrombolysis (n=183) | patients with acute myocardial infarction , hospitalized within 4 h of the onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 188/183 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 2h | Di Pasquale, 1997 | captopril first dose 2-4 h after starting thrombolysis (the dose was then increased up to 25 mg every 8 h (n=31) vs. placebo (n=30) | patients hospitalized for suspected anterior AMI within 4 h from the onset of symptoms suitable for thrombolysis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 31/30 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 12h | Galcera, 1993 | captopril (n=21) vs. placebo (n=22) | patients with a first acute myocardial infarction and a pulmonary capillary pressure equal or above 17 mmHg | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 21/22 Primary endpoint: left ventricular volume indexes FU duration: 14 days | Hargreaves, 1992 | 12.5 mg of captopril three times daily (n=36) vs. placebo (n=36) | patients with acute myocardial infarction (systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg) within 24 hours of the start of pain | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 36/36 Primary endpoint: none defined FU duration: 28 days |
|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | enalapril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| enalapril vs placebo | | | | | enalapril vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CONSENSUS 2, 1992 | enalapril (1 mg IV infusion +5-20 mg PO daily) for 6 months (n=3044) vs. placebo (n=3046) | patients with acute myocardial infarctions and blood pressure above 100/60 mm Hg, <24h of MI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3044/3046 Primary endpoint: all cause death FU duration: 6 months | Schulman, 1995 | intravenous enalaprilat (1 mg) then oral treatment for 1 month (n=22) vs. placebo (n=21) | patients with an acute Q-wave AMI within 24 hours of symptom onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 22/21 Primary endpoint: cardiac volumes and ejection fraction FU duration: 1 year |
|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | fosinopril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| fosinopril vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FAMIS, 1998 | fosinopril (n=142) vs. placebo (n=143) | patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction within 9 hours of onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 142/143 Primary endpoint: LV volumes FU duration: 2 years |
|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | lisinopril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| lisinopril vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
GISSI 3, 1994 | lisinopril (5 mg initial dose and then 10 mg daily) for 42 days (n=9435) vs. open control (n=9460) | Acute MI <24h of MI | open Factorial plan Sample size: 9435/9460 Primary endpoint: all cause mortality FU duration: 6 months |
|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | ramipril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Wagner, 2002 | ramipril vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Wagner, 2002 | 2.5 mg ramipril orally prior to thrombolysis and 12 h later (n=51) vs. placebo (n=48) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 51/48 Primary endpoint: PAI-1 plasma levels FU duration: 7 days |
|
angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | zofenopril | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SMILE, 1995 | zofenopril vs placebo | Long term death (1 year) 0.70 [0.54; 0.93] death or severe congestive heart failure 0.67 [0.49; 0.93] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SMILE, 1995 | zofenopril initial dose 7.5 mg, up to a tagert dos eof 30mg twice daily (n=772) vs. placebo (n=784) | patients within 24 hours after a acute anterior myocardial infarction who were not undergoing thrombolysis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 772/784 Primary endpoint: death or severe congestive FU duration: 1 year |
|
angiotensin-receptor blockers | losartan | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy Losartan inferior to Captopril in terms of Cardiovascular death in OPTIMAAL, 2002 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
OPTIMAAL, 2002 | Losartan vs Captopril | Angioedema 0.28 [0.09; 0.86] | Cardiovascular death 1.15 [1.01; 1.31] | cancer death 1.00 [0.65; 1.52] Hypotension 0.77 [0.53; 1.12] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
OPTIMAAL, 2002 | Losartan, target dose of 50 mg daily (n=2744) vs. Captopril, traget dose of 50 mg 3 times daily (n=2733) | patients within 10 days of a confirmed acute myocardial
infarction and heart failure during the acute phase or a new
Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2744/2733 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality FU duration: 2.7 y |
|
angiotensin-receptor blockers | valsartan | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
VALIANT (valsartan alone), 2003 | Valsartan vs Captopril | | | Cardiovascular death 1.00 [0.91; 1.09] | VALIANT (valsartan+capropril), 2003 | Valsartan+ACE inhibitor vs ACE inhibitor only | | | Cardiovascular death 1.00 [0.92; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
VALIANT (valsartan alone), 2003 | Valsartan, 160 mg twice daily (n=4909) vs. Captopril, 50 mg 3 times daily (n=4909) | patients within 10 days of a MI complicated by HF | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4909/4909 Primary endpoint: mortality from any cause FU duration: Median, 24.7 mo | VALIANT (valsartan+capropril), 2003 | Valsartan, 40 mg twice daily, plus captopril, 25 mg three times daily (n=4885) vs. Captopril, 25 mg 3 times daily (n=4909) | patients within 10 days of a MI complicated by HF | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4885/4909 Primary endpoint: mortality from any cause FU duration: Median, 24.7 mo |
|
antiarrythmic drugs | amiodarone | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
BASIS, 1990 | early amiodarone vs control | Total mortality 0.41 [0.17; 0.99] | | Arrhythmic/sudden death 0.52 [0.18; 1.52] | CAMIAT , 1991 | early amiodarone vs placebo | | | Total mortality 0.82 [0.58; 1.15] Arrhythmic/sudden death 0.71 [0.42; 1.19] | Ceremuzynski, 1992 | early amiodarone vs placebo | | | Total mortality 0.63 [0.38; 1.06] Arrhythmic/sudden death 0.51 [0.25; 1.03] | Navarro-Lopez, 1993 | early amiodarone vs control | | | Total mortality 0.48 [0.16; 1.43] Arrhythmic/sudden death 0.63 [0.16; 2.48] | Hockings, 1987 | early amiodarone vs placebo | | | Total mortality 1.94 [0.84; 4.46] Arrhythmic/sudden death 1.64 [0.36; 7.49] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
BASIS, 1990 | amiodarone 1 g for 5 d; then 200 mg/d started within 4 weeks of AMI (n=98) vs. no amiodarone (usual care) (n=14) | patients with persisting asymptomatic complex arrhythmias after myocardial infarction (Lown class 3 or 4b in > 2 of 24 h) | open Parallel groups Sample size: 98/14 Primary endpoint: total mortality and arrhythmic events FU duration: 12 mo | CAMIAT , 1991 | amiodarone 10 mg/kg per d for 3 weeks then 300-400 mg/d started 6-45 d after AMI (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within the previous 6-30 days and > 10 VPDs/h for 18 h or a run of VT | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 mo | Ceremuzynski, 1992 | amiodarone 800 mg/d for 1 week then 200-400 mg/d started 5-7 d after AMI (n=305) vs. placebo (n=308) | No need for antiarrhythmic therapy | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 305/308 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 mo | Navarro-Lopez, 1993 | amiodarone 600 mg/d for 1 week, 400 mg/d for 1 week then 200 mg/d started 10-30 d after AMI (n=115) vs. no amiodarone (n=123) | patients who have had MI with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 20 to 45% and > or = 3 ventricular premature complexes per hour (pairs or runs) - 3 VPOs/h, pairs or runs of VT | open Parallel groups Sample size: 115/123 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 mo | Hockings, 1987 | amiodarone 200 mg 3 times daily for 1 wk; then 200 mg/d started < 8-10 d after AMI (n=59) vs. placebo (n=70) | patients with AMI - Absence of VF or VT > 3 beats | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 59/70 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6·42 mo |
|
antiarrythmic drugs | magnesium | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy magnesium inferior to control in terms of Heart failure in ISIS-4, 1995 magnesium inferior to control in terms of Profound hypotension in ISIS-4, 1995 magnesium inferior to control in terms of II-III heart block in ISIS-4, 1995 magnesium inferior to control in terms of Cardiogenic shock in ISIS-4, 1995 magnesium inferior to control in terms of Bradycardia in ISIS-4, 1995 magnesium inferior to placebo in terms of Heart failure in Morton, 1984 magnesium inferior to placebo in terms of II-III heart block in Morton, 1984 magnesium inferior to placebo in terms of Bradycardia in Woods, 1992 | 25 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Abraham, 1987 | magnesium vs placebo | | | Ventricular tachycardia 0.41 [0.11; 1.49] All cause death 0.96 [0.06; 14.87] Profound hypotension 0.48 [0.04; 5.11] Ventricular fibrillation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Cardiogenic shock 0.96 [0.06; 14.87] Bradycardia ∞ [NaN; ∞] | ISIS-4, 1995 | magnesium vs control | Ventricular fibrillation 0.91 [0.84; 0.99] | Heart failure 1.07 [1.03; 1.11] Profound hypotension 1.11 [1.07; 1.16] II-III heart block 1.07 [1.03; 1.11] Cardiogenic shock 1.11 [1.03; 1.20] Bradycardia 7.42 [4.06; 13.56] | All cause death 1.06 [0.98; 1.14] | MAGIC, 2000 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death 1.00 [0.89; 1.13] Heart failure 1.06 [0.95; 1.17] II-III heart block 1.06 [0.95; 1.17] severe arrhythmia 1.01 [0.81; 1.26] | Bhargava, 1995 | magnesium vs placebo | Ventricular tachycardia 0.48 [0.29; 0.78] | | All cause death 0.95 [0.20; 4.42] Ventricular fibrillation 0.63 [0.11; 3.58] Cardiogenic shock 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Bradycardia 1.90 [0.18; 20.10] | Ceremuzynski, 1989 | magnesium vs placebo | Ventricular tachycardia 0.36 [0.18; 0.70] | | All cause death 0.31 [0.03; 2.74] Ventricular fibrillation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Cardiogenic shock ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Chen, 1991 | magnesium vs placebo | severe arrhythmia 0.35 [0.17; 0.70] | | Ventricular tachycardia 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Ventricular fibrillation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Feldstedt, 1991 | magnesium vs placebo | | | Ventricular tachycardia ∞ [NaN; ∞] All cause death 1.23 [0.50; 3.04] Heart failure 1.38 [0.45; 4.25] Ventricular fibrillation 0.66 [0.11; 3.88] II-III heart block 1.38 [0.45; 4.25] | Gyamlani, 2000 | magnesium vs placebo | Ventricular tachycardia 0.27 [0.08; 0.92] All cause death 0.20 [0.05; 0.87] Heart failure 0.60 [0.36; 1.00] II-III heart block 0.60 [0.36; 1.00] | | Ventricular fibrillation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Cardiogenic shock 0.40 [0.08; 1.97] Bradycardia ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Ising, 1990 | magnesium vs placebo | | | | Morton, 1984 | magnesium vs placebo | | Heart failure 2.52 [1.01; 6.30] II-III heart block 2.52 [1.01; 6.30] | All cause death 0.45 [0.04; 4.76] Profound hypotension ∞ [NaN; ∞] Ventricular fibrillation 1.80 [0.17; 19.02] | Nakashima, 2004 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death 0.34 [0.04; 3.22] Heart failure 0.66 [0.39; 1.10] Ventricular fibrillation 1.79 [0.54; 5.90] II-III heart block 0.66 [0.39; 1.10] Cardiogenic shock 0.85 [0.39; 1.87] | Parikka, 1990 | magnesium vs placebo | | | Heart failure 0.98 [0.38; 2.55] II-III heart block 0.98 [0.38; 2.55] | Raghu, 1999 | magnesium vs placebo | All cause death 0.36 [0.15; 0.88] | | Bradycardia ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Rasmussen, 1986 | magnesium vs placebo | | | Ventricular tachycardia 0.93 [0.38; 2.28] All cause death 0.38 [0.13; 1.08] Heart failure 1.32 [0.08; 20.67] II-III heart block 1.32 [0.08; 20.67] Cardiogenic shock 0.00 [0.00; NaN] severe arrhythmia 1.13 [0.57; 2.25] Bradycardia 0.44 [0.09; 2.10] | Santoro, 2000 | magnesium vs placebo | | | Ventricular tachycardia 1.64 [0.83; 3.22] All cause death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Heart failure 1.20 [0.38; 3.76] II-III heart block 1.20 [0.38; 3.76] Bradycardia ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Shechter, 1990 | magnesium vs placebo | All cause death 0.12 [0.02; 0.90] | | Heart failure 0.84 [0.48; 1.46] II-III heart block 1.06 [0.55; 2.06] Cardiogenic shock 0.18 [0.02; 1.42] severe arrhythmia 0.71 [0.43; 1.17] | Shechter, 1991 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death 0.60 [0.12; 2.93] II-III heart block 0.71 [0.31; 1.64] Cardiogenic shock 0.30 [0.04; 2.46] severe arrhythmia 0.68 [0.36; 1.30] | Shechter, 1995 | magnesium vs placebo | All cause death 0.24 [0.08; 0.69] Cardiogenic shock 0.09 [0.01; 0.70] | | II-III heart block 0.84 [0.48; 1.46] severe arrhythmia 0.68 [0.45; 1.02] | Singh, 1990 | magnesium vs placebo | severe arrhythmia 0.37 [0.20; 0.67] | | All cause death 0.55 [0.21; 1.40] Profound hypotension 1.67 [0.79; 3.54] Cardiogenic shock 1.00 [0.26; 3.83] | Smith, 1986 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death 0.29 [0.06; 1.35] severe arrhythmia 0.72 [0.24; 2.19] | Thogersen, 1995 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death 0.47 [0.14; 1.52] | Urek, 1996 | magnesium vs placebo | | | All cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] II-III heart block 0.97 [0.06; 14.78] severe arrhythmia 0.62 [0.28; 1.38] | Woods, 1992 | magnesium vs placebo | All cause death 0.76 [0.59; 0.99] Heart failure 0.75 [0.61; 0.93] II-III heart block 0.75 [0.61; 0.93] | Bradycardia 1.34 [1.04; 1.73] | Profound hypotension 1.00 [0.70; 1.43] | Wu, 1992 | magnesium vs control | Ventricular tachycardia 0.29 [0.11; 0.78] All cause death 0.34 [0.12; 0.93] Ventricular fibrillation 0.12 [0.01; 0.93] severe arrhythmia 0.39 [0.23; 0.64] | | Heart failure 0.86 [0.48; 1.55] II-III heart block 0.86 [0.48; 1.55] | Zhu, 2002 | magnesium vs control | All cause death 0.66 [0.52; 0.85] Ventricular fibrillation 0.52 [0.35; 0.80] | | Cardiogenic shock 0.66 [0.42; 1.03] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Abraham, 1987 | 2.4g of magnesium sulfate in 50 ml of 5% glucose solution intravenously over a 20 minutes period for 3 days (n=48) vs. 50 ml of 5% glucose solution alone, imag (n=46) | patients with AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 48/46 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | ISIS-4, 1995 | 24 h of intravenous magnesium sulphate (8 mmol initial bonus injection over about 15
minutes followed by 72 mmol in about 50 mLinfused over 24 h)4 (n=29011) vs. no magnesium infusion (n=29030) | patients entering 1086 hospitals up to 24 h (median 8 h) after the onset of suspected acute myocardial
infarction with no clear contraindications4 | open Parallel groups Sample size: 29011/29030 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | MAGIC, 2000 | 2 g intravenous bolus of MgSO4 over 15 minutes, followed by a 17 g infusion of MgSO4
over 24 h (n=3113) vs. matched intravenous bolus and 24 h infusion of sterile waterndºã (n=3100) | AMi patients within 6 h of onset of symptomsm | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3113/3100 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Bhargava, 1995 | 8 mmol magnesium sulphate over 5 min followed by 65 mmol over 24-h infusion (n=40) vs. isotonic saline infusion (n=38) | proven AMI patients with chest pain of 1-6h | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 40/38 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Ceremuzynski, 1989 | 8 g MgSO4 in 500 mL 15% glucose for 24 h intravenouslypj (n=25) vs. conventional treatmenton (n=23) | patients with AMI within 12 h from onset of symptomslypj | NA Parallel groups Sample size: 25/23 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Chen, 1991 | MgSO4 2g/day for 3 daysn (n=32) vs. 5% glucose (n=30) | patients with AMI | open blind assessor Parallel groups Sample size: 32/30 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Feldstedt, 1991 | continuous infusion of 80 mmol magnesium chloride in 1000 mL dextrose˜K (n=150) vs. matching placebo (n=148) | patients, aged 75 y or less, with suspected AMI less than 8 h+—² | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 150/148 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Gyamlani, 2000 | magnesium 12g (50 mmol) in the first 24h, 3g (12 mmol) in the second 24h used within 2h after admission and within 30 minutes of thrombolytic therapy™ (n=50) vs. equal volume of isotonic glucose (n=50) | patients with proven AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Ising, 1990 | 81 mval/daymagnesium sulphate infusion 13+/-9h after the onset of severe pain for 3 days (n=22) vs. 80 mval/day NaCl infusion for 3 daysimag (n=20) | patients with AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 22/20 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Morton, 1984 | 36 h intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate (0.75 mEq/kg/body weight/12 h). (n=-9) vs. saline solution infusion (n=-9) | patients with AMI within 8 h of onsetmag | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Nakashima, 2004 | bolus injection of 8 mmol of magnesium followed by an infusion of 24 mmol over 24 h (n=89) vs. equivalent amount of normal saline, imag (n=91) | patients with successful PCI weree, imag | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 89/91 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Parikka, 1990 | 8mmol MgSO4 in 10 min, 62 mmol in 24hmag (n=31) vs. NaCl ¯B (n=26) | patients with < 12 h from onset of chest pain AMImage/pj | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 31/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Raghu, 1999 | 18 g (75.6 mmol) of Mg sulphate over 24 h started immediately after completion of thrombolytic
therapy (n=181) vs. equivalent amount of salinexbitm (n=169) | confirmed AMI < 6 h from the onset of symptomsce | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 181/169 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Rasmussen, 1986 | 50 mmol MgCl2 during the first 24 h, 12 mmol during the second 24 h (n=56) vs. isotonic glucose (n=74) | patients with suspected AMIxbitm | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 56/74 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Santoro, 2000 | MgSO4 7 g (28 mmol) with 5 hon (n=75) vs. matching saline solution (n=75) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 75/75 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Shechter, 1990 | magnesium 22 g (91.6 mmol) within 48 h (67 mmol within first 24 h). (n=50) vs. isotonic glucose. (n=53) | patients with admission diagnosis of AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 50/53 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Shechter, 1991 | 22 g (91.6 mmol) within 48 h (67 mmol within first 24 h). (n=21) vs. isotonic glucose. (n=25) | patients with documented AMIbitm | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 21/25 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Shechter, 1995 | magnesium 22 g (91.6mmol) within 48 h (67mmol within first 24 h)pj (n=96) vs. isotonic glucose (n=98) | suspected with AMI and considered unsuitable candidates for thrombolysis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 96/98 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Singh, 1990 | 5 g (8.12 mmol) of MgSO4 daily for 4 daysptomsce (n=-9) vs. 2% dextrose solution for 3 daysm (n=-9) | patients suspected with AMI within 8-12h of the onset of MI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Smith, 1986 | 65 mmol MgSO4 given over 24 h (n=92) vs. Saline (n=93) | patients with suspected AMI h.tm | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 92/93 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Thogersen, 1995 | magensium 50 mmol within 24 h (n=130) vs. isotonic NaCl. (n=122) | patients with suspected AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 130/122 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Urek, 1996 | 17 g MgSO4 with first 24 h.xbitm (n=31) vs. saline. (n=30) | patients with documented AMIbitm | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 31/30 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Woods, 1992 | magnesium 8 mmol over 5 min, 65 mmol over 24h imag (n=1159) vs. physiological saline hon (n=1157) | patients with suspected AMI in the preceding 24h | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1159/1157 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Wu, 1992 | 2.5 g MgSO4 once or twice a day for 7-14 dayssce (n=125) vs. usual care (n=102) | suspected AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 125/102 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Zhu, 2002 | 100 mL (4 g) potassium-magnesium aspartate IV. for the first day, 50 ml for rest 4 datio (n=1691) vs. routine AMI treatmentÆ’kB (n=1488) | AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 1691/1488 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
anticoagulant | coumadin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy coumadin inferior to placebo in terms of Major Bleeding in ASPECT, 1994 coumadin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT, 1994 | coumadin vs placebo | Thrombotic Stroke 0.60 [0.40; 0.89] myocardial infarction 0.47 [0.38; 0.58] | Major Bleeding 3.85 [2.34; 6.35] | Death 0.90 [0.74; 1.10] | ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | coumadin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Minor Bleeding 3.03 [1.77; 5.20] | Death 0.58 [0.26; 1.31] Revascularization 0.80 [0.51; 1.23] Major Bleeding 2.26 [0.59; 8.67] Thrombotic Stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.69 [0.31; 1.53] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT, 1994 | nicoumalone or phenprocoumon, target INR 2.8–4.8 (n=1700) vs. placebo (n=1704) | hospital survivors of myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1700/1704 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 37 months (range 6-76) | ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | coumadin(INR mean 2.4) +aspirin
(n=298) vs. aspirin
(n=289)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 298/289 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year
|
|
anticoagulant | coumadin | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002 | coumadin vs aspirin | Death 0.28 [0.09; 0.82] | | Revascularization 0.90 [0.58; 1.39] Major Bleeding 1.03 [0.21; 5.09] Minor Bleeding 1.68 [0.92; 3.07] intrcranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.96 [0.46; 2.01] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.57 [0.32; 1.00] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002 | coumadin (phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) target INR 3-4 (n=325) vs. aspirin 80mg daily (n=336)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 325/336 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year (range 0-26 months)
|
|
anticoagulant | warfarin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in Zibaeenezhad, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of cardiovascular event in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of non fatal MI in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Thrombotic Stroke in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | 9 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
APRICOT-2, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | Revascularization 0.33 [0.19; 0.57] myocardial infarction 0.28 [0.08; 0.98] | | Death ∞ [NaN; ∞] Major Bleeding 1.03 [0.15; 7.21] Minor Bleeding 2.57 [0.51; 13.04] | Williams, 1997 | warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | myocardial infarction 0.17 [0.03; 1.00] | | Death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Revascularization 1.11 [0.45; 2.77] Major Bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] Minor Bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] Thrombotic Stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] | Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Minor Bleeding 6.50 [1.52; 27.75] | Death 0.33 [0.07; 1.60] Major Bleeding 2.50 [0.50; 12.46] Thrombotic Stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.67 [0.20; 2.26] | WARIS, 1999 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | | CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Major Bleeding 1.75 [1.24; 2.47] Minor Bleeding 4.56 [3.58; 5.80] | Death 1.02 [0.90; 1.15] Thrombotic Stroke 0.89 [0.66; 1.20] intrcranial major bleeding 0.94 [0.45; 1.94] myocardial infarction 1.02 [0.88; 1.17] | CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | cardiovascular event 0.60 [0.52; 0.70] non fatal MI 0.57 [0.48; 0.69] cardiovascular death 0.69 [0.52; 0.92] Death 0.73 [0.56; 0.94] | | Major Bleeding 1.09 [0.70; 1.70] Thrombotic Stroke 0.93 [0.53; 1.61] | LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | Thrombotic Stroke 0.68 [0.48; 0.94] stroke 0.67 [0.50; 0.88] | Major Bleeding 2.23 [1.24; 3.99] Minor Bleeding 2.21 [1.55; 3.14] | cardiovascular event 0.97 [0.87; 1.09] cardiovascular death 0.91 [0.77; 1.07] Death 0.95 [0.83; 1.10] intrcranial major bleeding 1.98 [0.68; 5.78] myocardial infarction 1.04 [0.90; 1.22] | CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | cardiovascular event 1.29 [1.10; 1.51] non fatal MI 1.31 [1.09; 1.58] Thrombotic Stroke 2.23 [1.27; 3.92] | cardiovascular death 1.07 [0.77; 1.49] Death 1.03 [0.76; 1.41] Major Bleeding 1.45 [0.86; 2.44] | WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | cardiovascular event 0.71 [0.59; 0.86] non fatal MI 0.56 [0.42; 0.75] Thrombotic Stroke 0.50 [0.28; 0.91] myocardial infarction 0.56 [0.42; 0.75] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.71 [0.59; 0.86] | Major Bleeding 3.32 [1.51; 7.27] Minor Bleeding 3.23 [2.27; 4.61] | Death 0.98 [0.74; 1.30] Revascularization 0.90 [0.79; 1.02] intrcranial major bleeding 2.84 [0.30; 27.32] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
APRICOT-2, 2002 | moderate-intensity coumarin target INR 2-3 (+aspirin)
(n=135) vs. aspirin
(n=139)
| Acute MI after thrombolytics
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 135/139 Primary endpoint: reocclusion of the infarct-related artery FU duration: 3 months
| Williams, 1997 | warfarin target INR 2–2.5 +aspirin
(n=6) vs. placebo +aspirin
(n=5)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 6/5 Primary endpoint: quantitative angiography FU duration: 2.5 months
| Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | Warfarin target INR 2–3 +aspirin (n=70) vs. aspirin 100 mg/day (n=70)
| Acute MI
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 70/70 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year
| WARIS, 1999 | warfarin 2.8–4.8 (n=1208) vs. placebo (n=1206)
| survivors of acute myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1208/1206 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 37 months
| CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin target INR 1.5-2.5 + aspirin 81 mg daily (n=2522) vs. aspirin 162 mg/d (n=2537) | AMI (patients enrolled within 14 days of infarction) | open Parallel groups Sample size: 2522/2537 Primary endpoint: all cause mortality FU duration: 2.7 years | CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997 | warfarin fixed dose 3mg/d + 80 mg ASA
(n=5410) vs. aspirin 160 mg/d
(n=3393)
| AMI
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5410/3393 Primary endpoint: reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death FU duration: 14 months
| LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin fixed dose 1.25mg/d + ASA 75mg/d (n=1659) vs. aspirin alone (n=1641)
| AMI
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 1659/1641 Primary endpoint: Cardiovascular event and CV death FU duration: 5 years
| CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 | warfarin 1mg/d + aspirin 80mg/d
(n=2028) vs. aspirin 160 mg/d
(n=3393)
| patients who had had myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2028/3393 Primary endpoint: reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death FU duration: 14 months
| WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2-2.5 +ASA 75mg/d (n=4927) vs. ASA 160mg/d (n=4669) | patients hospitalized for acute myocardial
infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 4927/4669 Primary endpoint: death, MI, ischaemic stroke FU duration: 4 years |
|
anticoagulant | warfarin | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to aspirin in terms of Major Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 warfarin inferior to aspirin in terms of Minor Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | warfarin vs aspirin | cardiovascular event 0.84 [0.71; 0.99] non fatal MI 0.76 [0.59; 0.99] Thrombotic Stroke 0.53 [0.29; 0.94] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.81 [0.69; 0.95] | Major Bleeding 4.09 [1.90; 8.82] Minor Bleeding 2.62 [1.83; 3.75] | Death 1.03 [0.79; 1.36] intrcranial major bleeding 4.96 [0.58; 42.38] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2.8-4.2
(n=1216) vs. ASA 160mg/d
(n=1206)
| patients hospitalized for acute myocardial
infarction
| NA Parallel groups Sample size: 1216/1206 Primary endpoint: death, MI, ischaemic stroke FU duration: 48 months
|
|
antithrombotics | aspirin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Dutch-aspirin, 1990 | aspirin vs placebo | | | vascular death 0.75 [0.35; 1.62] non fatla stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal MI 0.33 [0.07; 1.57] vascular events 0.67 [0.36; 1.23] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | ISIS-pilot, 1987 | aspirin vs placebo | | | vascular death 0.70 [0.43; 1.14] major bleeding 0.98 [0.06; 15.56] non fatla stroke 0.49 [0.04; 5.36] non fatal MI 0.76 [0.29; 2.02] vascular events 0.70 [0.46; 1.07] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | ISIS-2, 1988 | aspirin vs placebo | vascular death 0.80 [0.73; 0.87] non fatla stroke 0.56 [0.35; 0.88] non fatal MI 0.46 [0.35; 0.61] vascular events 0.74 [0.68; 0.80] | | major bleeding 1.34 [0.73; 2.46] non vascular death 0.29 [0.06; 1.38] | Huddinge, 1988 | aspirin vs control | | | vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatla stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] vascular events NaN [NaN; NaN] non vascular death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Frankfurt, 1976 | aspirin vs control | | | vascular death 1.12 [0.07; 16.98] non fatla stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] vascular events 1.12 [0.07; 16.98] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | APRICOT, 1993 | aspirin vs placebo | non fatal MI 0.27 [0.08; 0.94] vascular events 0.30 [0.10; 0.89] | | vascular death 0.44 [0.04; 4.82] non fatla stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Dutch-aspirin, 1990 | aspirin (100 mg/day) for 3 months (n=50) vs. placebo (n=50) | patients with first anterior wall AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3m | ISIS-pilot, 1987 | aspirin (325 mg on alternate days for 28 days) (n=313) vs. placebo (n=306) | suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 313/306 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1m | ISIS-2, 1988 | 160 mg/day enteric-coated aspirin for one month (n=8587) vs. placebo (n=8600) | suspected acute myocardial up to 24h | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 8587/8600 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 35d | Huddinge, 1988 | aspirin 500mg/d starting 12 h after admissionand and then intermittently every third day for one month (n=10) vs. no aspirin (n=10) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 10/10 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30d (12m) | Frankfurt, 1976 | A1320 + D300, A1320 (n=25) vs. (n=28) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 25/28 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14d | APRICOT, 1993 | 325 mg aspirin daily with discontinuation of heparin (n=107) vs. placebo (n=95) | Patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy followed by intravenous heparin and with patent infarct-related artery demonstrated at angiography within 48 hours | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 107/95 Primary endpoint: patency of the infarct related artery FU duration: 3m |
|
antithrombotics | clopidogrel | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
COMMIT, 2005 | clopidogrel vs placebo | non fatal MI 0.82 [0.70; 0.96] vascular events 0.92 [0.87; 0.97] | | non fatla stroke 0.89 [0.70; 1.13] | | T1 vs T0 | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
COMMIT, 2005 | clopidogrel 75 mg daily (n=22961) vs. placebo (n=22891) | patients admitted to hospital within 24 h of suspected acute MI onset | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 22961/22891 Primary endpoint: death, reinfarction, or stroke FU duration: until discharge or up to 4 wee | CLARITY-TIMI 28, 2005 | clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily)
(n=-9) vs. placebo
(n=-9)
| patients, 18 to 75 years of age, within 12 hours after the onset of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction
| double blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: death, reMI, occlusion FU duration: 30 days
|
|
antithrombotics | dalteparin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FRAMI, 1997 | Dalteparin vs placebo | | | | BIOMACS II, 1999 | Dalteparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FRAMI, 1997 | Dalteparin 150 mg/kg BID for 7–11 d (n=388) vs. placebo (n=388) | patients with an acute MI, Q wave or STEMI | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 388/388 Primary endpoint: Echocardiographic LV thrombus, arterial embolism FU duration: in hospital | BIOMACS II, 1999 | Dalteparin 100 mg/kg, 2 doses (n=54) vs. placebo (n=47) | patients with acute myocardial infarction, Age <=80 y, STEMI or new LBBB | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 54/47 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow in infarct-related vessel FU duration: 14–21 d |
|
antithrombotics | dalteparin | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT Plus, 2003 | Dalteparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 0.96 [0.47; 1.97] death at 30 dayas 0.79 [0.33; 1.86] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT Plus, 2003 | Dalteparin first dose 90 IU/kg, then 120 IU/kg BID, 4–7 d (n=221) vs. UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 800–1000 IU/h for 48 h (n=213) | Patients with AMI treated with alteplase | open Parallel groups Sample size: 221/213 Primary endpoint: Angiographic 60-min TIMI flow FU duration: 30 d |
|
antithrombotics | elinogrel | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ERASE-MI, 2009 | elinogrel vs placebo | | | major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatla stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ERASE-MI, 2009 | elinogrel 10, 20, 40, or 60 mg as a single intravenous bolus (n=34) vs. placebo (n=36) 5 arms: 4 doses of elinogrel or placebo before the start of the diagnostic angiogram preceding primary PCI | STEMI patients | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 34/36 Primary endpoint: TIMI and ST resolution FU duration: 30-37 days phase IIb (dose-escalation study) |
|
antithrombotics | enoxaparin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AMI-SK, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AMI-SK, 2002 | Enoxaparin 30 mg IV bolus, 1 mg/kg for 3–8 d (n=253) vs. placebo (n=243) | patients with evolving myocardial infarction, Age >=18 y, STEMI | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 253/243 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow in infarct-related vessel FU duration: 30 d |
|
antithrombotics | enoxaparin | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT 3, 2001 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | reinfarction at 30 days 0.64 [0.46; 0.88] | | death at 30 dayas 0.89 [0.69; 1.15] | HART II, 2001 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 1.00 [0.38; 2.61] death at 30 dayas 0.90 [0.37; 2.17] | Baird, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 0.74 [0.45; 1.23] death at 30 dayas 0.57 [0.26; 1.25] | ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | reinfarction at 30 days 0.15 [0.04; 0.54] | | death at 30 dayas 0.68 [0.16; 2.98] | ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | death at 30 dayas 1.25 [0.87; 1.80] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT 3, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d (n=2040) vs. UFH 60 U/kg bolus, then 12 IU/kg per h for 48 h (n=2038) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 2040/2038 Primary endpoint: In-hospital MI or RI FU duration: 30 d | HART II, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=3d (n=200) vs. UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 15 IU/kg per hour for >=3d (n=200) | patients undergoing reperfusion therapy with an accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator regimen and aspirin for AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 200/200 Primary endpoint: infarct-related artery patency FU duration: 5–7 d | Baird, 2002 | Enoxaparin 40 mg TID, 4 d (n=149) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus, then 30 000 IU over 24 h for 4d (n=151) | patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction | 90-min TIMI flow Parallel groups Sample size: 149/151 Primary endpoint: death, non-fatal reinfarction, or readmission with unstable angina FU duration: 90 d | ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=8d (n=160) vs. UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d (n=82) | Patients with ST-elevation MI presenting <6 hours from symptom onset were | open Parallel groups Sample size: 160/82 Primary endpoint: MI, death, readmit for UA FU duration: 30 d | ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d (n=818) vs. UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d (n=821) | patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 818/821 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow FU duration: 30 d |
|
antithrombotics | fondaparinux | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006 | fondaparinux vs placebo | death in hospital 0.87 [0.76; 0.99] death or reinfarction 0.87 [0.78; 0.96] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.68 [0.52; 0.88] death at 30 dayas 0.87 [0.78; 0.98] | | Major bleeding 0.83 [0.64; 1.06] reinfarction at 30 days 0.81 [0.65; 1.01] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006 | fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days (n=6036) vs. control (UFH or placebo) (n=6056) from day 3 through day 9, all patients received either fondaparinux or placebo | patients with STEMI | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 6036/6056 Primary endpoint: death or reinfarction FU duration: 30 days |
|
antithrombotics | reviparin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CREATE, 2005 | Reviparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CREATE, 2005 | Reviparin 3436–6871 IU BID for 7 d (weight adjusted) (n=7780) vs. placebo (n=7790) | patients with acute myocardial infarction, STEMI or new LBBB, <=12 h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7780/7790 Primary endpoint: Death, MI, or stroke; death, MI, stroke, or recurrent ischemia FU duration: 30 d |
|
antithrombotics | sulfinpyrazone | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Dutch sulphinpyrazone, 1986 | sulfinpyrazone vs control | | | vascular death 0.50 [0.10; 2.61] major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatla stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] vascular events 0.50 [0.10; 2.61] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Wilcox, 1980 | sulfinpyrazone vs placebo | | | vascular death 5.00 [0.61; 41.25] vascular events 5.00 [0.61; 41.25] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Louvain sulphinpyrazone, 1983 | sulfinpyrazone vs placebo | | | vascular death ∞ [NaN; ∞] vascular events ∞ [NaN; ∞] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Dutch sulphinpyrazone, 1986 | S (W) (n=50) vs. (n=50) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 21d | Wilcox, 1980 | Sulphinpyrazone 200 mg four times daily (n=49) vs. placebo (n=49) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | Parallel groups Sample size: 49/49 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 10d | Louvain sulphinpyrazone, 1983 | sulphinpyrazone, 4 x 200 mg daily for 7 days (n=15) vs. placebo (n=14) | recent myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 15/14 Primary endpoint: renal function FU duration: 7d |
|
antithrombotics | ticlopidine | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Knudsen-A, 1985 | ticlopidine vs control | | | vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatla stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] vascular events NaN [NaN; NaN] non vascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Knudsen-A, 1985 | ticlopidine 500mg/d (n=24) vs. placebo (n=19) | patients with AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 24/19 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3m |
|
antithrombotics | UFH | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987 | UFH vs no heparin | | | death in hospital 1.30 [0.47; 3.60] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.19 [0.02; 1.64] | ECSG, 1992 | UFH vs placebo | | | death in hospital 0.81 [0.34; 1.92] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.99 [0.42; 2.34] | OSIRIS, 1992 | UFH vs placebo | | | death in hospital 0.33 [0.04; 3.12] reinfarction during hospitalization 2.00 [0.19; 21.51] | DUCCS, 1994 | UFH vs no heparin | | | death in hospital 1.43 [0.61; 3.38] reinfarction during hospitalization 2.14 [0.68; 6.78] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987 | UFH nNo bolus, 1000 IU/h for 48 h (n=106) vs. No heparin (n=103) | patients with suspected MI <=24 h | open Parallel groups Sample size: 106/103 Primary endpoint: New MI, death FU duration: In-hospital, 1 y (deat | ECSG, 1992 | UFH 5000 IU bolus, UFH 1000 IU/h for 48–120 h (n=324) vs. Placebo (n=320) | patients treated with alteplase thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, Age 21–70 y STEMI <=6h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 324/320 Primary endpoint: Angiographic patency FU duration: In-hospital | OSIRIS, 1992 | UFH 10 000 IU bolus, 1000 IU/h for 24 h (n=64) vs. Placebo (n=64) | STEMI w=6 h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 64/64 Primary endpoint: Reperfusion, angiographic patency, LVEF FU duration: In-hospital | DUCCS, 1994 | UFH no bolus, 15 IU/kg per h for 4 d; target aPTT 50–90 s (n=128) vs. No heparin (n=122) | patients with acute myocardial infarction four hours after APSAC administration, age <=85 y STEMI <=12 h | open Parallel groups Sample size: 128/122 Primary endpoint: Death, recurrent MI, recurrent ischemia, angiographic patency FU duration: 14 d |
|
beta-blockers | acebutolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Azancot, 1982 | Acebutolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | APSI, 1990 | Acebutolol vs placebo | all cause death 0.52 [0.30; 0.91] cardiovascular death 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] | | fatal and nonfatal MI 0.85 [0.36; 2.02] Sudden death 0.69 [0.25; 1.92] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Azancot, 1982 | Acebutolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=14) vs. control (n=12) | patients seen within 24 hours after the onset of uncomplicated anterior transmural myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 14/12 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 month | APSI, 1990 | Acebutolol 200mg twice daily (n=298) vs. placebo (n=309) | patient surviving MI at hight risk | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 298/309 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: 318 days |
|
beta-blockers | alprenolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Andersen , 1979 | Alprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.97 [0.72; 1.31] | Wilhelmsson , 1974 | Alprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.51 [0.21; 1.21] reinfarction 0.90 [0.49; 1.68] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Andersen , 1979 | Alprenolol 5-10 mg intravenously, followed by 200 mg twice a day (n=238) vs. placebo (n=242) | patients years with definite or suspected myocardial infarction the 2 stratum <65 et >65 years are grouped together | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 238/242 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: About 1 year | Wilhelmsson , 1974 | Alprenolol 200mg twice daily (n=114) vs. placebo (n=116) | patient aged 57-67 years discharge alive after acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 114/116 Primary endpoint: NA (sudden cardiac death may be) FU duration: 2 years |
|
beta-blockers | atenolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS1 Collaborative Group , 1986 | Atenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.95 [0.88; 1.03] | Van de Werf , 1993 | Atenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.24 [0.03; 2.06] | Yusuf , 1980 | Atenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.78 [0.52; 1.17] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS1 Collaborative Group , 1986 | Atenolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=8037) vs. control (n=7990) | patients within 5 h the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction | No Sample size: 8037/7990 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year | Van de Werf , 1993 | Atenolol (n=100) vs. (n=94) | |
Double Sample size: 100/94 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1014 days | Yusuf , 1980 | Atenolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=244) vs. (n=233) | |
No Sample size: 244/233 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1-4y |
|
beta-blockers | betaxolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Yang , 1987 | Betaxolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Yang , 1987 | Betaxolol (n=16) vs. (n=15) | |
Double Sample size: 16/15 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 days |
|
beta-blockers | carvedilol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Basu , 1997 | Carvedilol vs placebo | cardiac event (fatal and non fatal ) 0.55 [0.34; 0.89] | | cardiovascular death 0.63 [0.11; 3.67] fatal and nonfatal MI 0.52 [0.20; 1.32] cardiac death 0.64 [0.11; 3.73] reinfarction 0.47 [0.15; 1.50] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Basu , 1997 | Carvedilol target dose 25 mg BID (n=77) vs. placebo (n=74) | Patients with acute MI <24h Patients were subsequently withdrawn if the cardiac enzymes failed to show the typical pattern of acute myocardial necrosis¬ | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 77/74 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular event FU duration: 6 months |
|
beta-blockers | labetalol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Heber , 1987 | Labetalol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.71 [0.71; 4.14] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Heber , 1987 | Labetalol (initial dose intravenously) (n=83) vs. control (n=83) | patients with suspected myocardial infarction | No Sample size: 83/83 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year |
|
beta-blockers | metoprolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 9 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
MIAMI Trial Research Group , 1985 | vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.87 [0.69; 1.11] | Von Essen , 1982 | vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.04 [0.07; 15.74] | Waagstein , 1975 | Practololormetoprolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | TIMI IIB, 1989 | vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.00 [0.51; 1.94] | Hjalmarson , 1981 | Metoprolol vs placebo | all cause death 0.64 [0.44; 0.95] reinfarction 0.65 [0.43; 0.98] | | | LIT Research Group , 1987 | Metoprolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.93 [0.70; 1.23] cardiovascular death 0.93 [0.69; 1.26] Sudden death 0.85 [0.48; 1.49] cardiac death 0.98 [0.72; 1.32] | Manger Cats , 1983 | Metoprolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.58 [0.26; 1.28] | Rehnqvist , 1983 | Metoprolol vs placebo | reinfarction 0.55 [0.32; 0.95] | | all cause death 0.77 [0.48; 1.24] | Salathia , 1985 | Metoprolol vs placebo | Sudden death 0.41 [0.18; 0.93] | | all cause death 0.79 [0.55; 1.13] cardiac death 0.84 [0.57; 1.25] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
MIAMI Trial Research Group , 1985 | Metoprolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=2877) vs. (n=2901) | |
Double Sample size: 2877/2901 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 15 days | Von Essen , 1982 | Metoprolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=25) vs. (n=26) | |
Double Sample size: 25/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 days | Waagstein , 1975 | Practolol, (initial dose intravenously) H87/07, or metoprolol (n=38) vs. (n=45) | |
Double Sample size: 38/45 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 week | TIMI IIB, 1989 | Metoprolol (initial dose intravenously) (15 mg) (n=696) vs. (n=694) | |
No Sample size: 696/694 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5 days | Hjalmarson , 1981 | Metoprolol 100mg twice daily (initial dose intravenously) (n=698) vs. placebo (n=697) | patients aged between 40 -74 years with suspected MI and onset of infarction within the previous 48h | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 698/697 Primary endpoint: all cause death FU duration: 2 years | LIT Research Group , 1987 | Metoprolol 100 mg bid (n=1195) vs. placebo (n=1200) treatment continued for up to 1 year | patients, 45 to 74 yearsof age, surviving a recent acute MI | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1195/1200 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality FU duration: 18 months | Manger Cats , 1983 | Metoprolol 100mg twice daily (n=273) vs. placebo (n=280) | MI, NYHA Class I or II and <=70 y | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 273/280 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 1 year | Rehnqvist , 1983 | Metoprolol 100mg twice daily (n=154) vs. placebo (n=147) | AMI patients <70 years in sinus rythm without complete BBB | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 154/147 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 36 months | Salathia , 1985 | Metoprolol 100 mg twice daily for one year (initial dose intravenously) (n=416) vs. placebo (n=384) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 416/384 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 1 year |
|
beta-blockers | oxprenolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CPRG , 1981 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.38 [0.47; 4.03] | Fuccella , 1968 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.79 [0.82; 3.92] | Lombardo , 1979 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.69 [0.29; 1.67] | Wilcox , 1980 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.41 [0.65; 3.08] | EIS , 1984 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.30 [0.89; 1.91] cardiovascular death 1.31 [0.88; 1.96] Sudden death 1.07 [0.62; 1.86] cardiac death 1.67 [0.90; 3.10] | Schwartz (high risk and low risk) , 1992 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | all cause death 0.48 [0.27; 0.83] cardiovascular death 0.40 [0.22; 0.74] fatal and nonfatal MI 0.47 [0.27; 0.79] | | reinfarction 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Taylor , 1982 | Oxprenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.93 [0.65; 1.34] fatal and nonfatal MI 0.87 [0.69; 1.10] reinfarction 0.86 [0.62; 1.20] cardiac event (fatal and non fatal ) 0.87 [0.69; 1.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CPRG , 1981 | Oxprenolol (n=177) vs. (n=136) | |
Double Sample size: 177/136 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 8 weeks | Fuccella , 1968 | Oxprenolol (n=106) vs. (n=114) | |
Unclear Sample size: 106/114 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 21 days | Lombardo , 1979 | Oxprenolol (n=133) vs. (n=127) | |
Double Sample size: 133/127 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 20 days | Wilcox , 1980 | Oxprenolol (n=157) vs. (n=158) | |
Double Sample size: 157/158 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 weeks | EIS , 1984 | Oxprenolol slow release 160 mg b.i.d. (n=858) vs. placebo (n=883) | patients 35 to 69 years whohas survived acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 858/883 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 1 year | Schwartz (high risk and low risk) , 1992 | Oxprenolol 160mg daily (n=485) vs. placebo (n=488) | patients surviving MI with or without complication by either ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 485/488 Primary endpoint: sudden death FU duration: 22 months (at least 6mo) | Taylor , 1982 | Oxprenolol 40mg twice daily (n=632) vs. placebo (n=471) | Men 35 to 65 years old who had an acute myocardial infarction between 1 and 90 months reviously | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 632/471 Primary endpoint: cardiac event FU duration: 48 months |
|
beta-blockers | pindolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Owensby , 1984 | Pindolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.00 [0.06; 15.55] | Australian and Swedish study, 1983 | Pindolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.97 [0.67; 1.40] Sudden death 0.91 [0.56; 1.48] cardiac death 0.94 [0.63; 1.40] reinfarction 0.93 [0.43; 2.01] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Owensby , 1984 | Pindolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=50) vs. (n=50) | |
No Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 days | Australian and Swedish study, 1983 | Pindolol 15 mg daily (n=263) vs. placebo (n=266) | patients who had electrical and/or mechanical complications after an acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 263/266 Primary endpoint: Death FU duration: 2 years |
|
beta-blockers | practolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Evemy , 1978 | Practolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.57 [0.60; 4.05] | Johansson , 1980 | Practolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.16 [0.47; 2.86] | Macleod , 1980 | Practolol vs placebo | | | all cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Snow , 1980 | Practolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.12 [0.62; 2.02] | Thompson , 1979 | Practolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.82 [0.26; 2.57] | Multicentre international , 1975 | Practolol vs placebo | Sudden death 0.57 [0.36; 0.91] cardiac death 0.75 [0.57; 0.99] | | all cause death 0.80 [0.62; 1.02] reinfarction 0.77 [0.57; 1.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Evemy , 1978 | Practolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=46) vs. (n=48) | |
No Sample size: 46/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 months | Johansson , 1980 | Practolol (initial dose intravenously) then atenolol (n=25) vs. (n=29) | |
Single Sample size: 25/29 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | Macleod , 1980 | Practolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=26) vs. (n=26) | |
Unclear Sample size: 26/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 week | Snow , 1980 | Practolol (n=76) vs. (n=67) | |
Unclear Sample size: 76/67 Primary endpoint: FU duration: Short term | Thompson , 1979 | Practolol (n=72) vs. (n=71) | |
Double Sample size: 72/71 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year | Multicentre international , 1975 | Practolol 200mg twice daily (n=1533) vs. placebo (n=1520) | patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1533/1520 Primary endpoint: death, reinfarction FU duration: 12 months, up to 24 months |
|
beta-blockers | propranolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy Propranolol inferior to placebo in terms of fatal and nonfatal MI in Hansteen , 1982 | 26 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Balcon , 1966 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.97 [0.52; 1.81] | Barber , 1976 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.75 [0.36; 1.58] | Clausen , 1966 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.92 [0.53; 1.58] | Curtis , 1991 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Dotremont , 1968 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.80 [0.23; 2.74] | Gupta , 1982 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Gupta , 1984 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Hutton , 1979 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Kahler , 1968 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.41 [0.11; 1.50] | Ledwich , 1968 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.67 [0.12; 3.78] | Mueller , 1980 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 2.00 [0.19; 21.06] | Multicentre , 1966 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.19 [0.59; 2.40] | Nigam , 1983 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Norris , 1968 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.30 [0.79; 2.15] | Norris , 1978 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Norris , 1984 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.09 [0.53; 2.23] | Peter , 1978 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.51 [0.05; 5.44] | Pitt , 1976 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Roberts , 1984 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.21 [0.70; 2.08] | Singh , 1985 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Sloman , 1967 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.66 [0.17; 2.66] | Aronow , 1997 | Propranolol vs control | all cause death 0.73 [0.58; 0.93] cardiac death 0.71 [0.55; 0.93] cardiac event (fatal and non fatal ) 0.72 [0.59; 0.89] | | reinfarction 0.60 [0.15; 2.43] | Baber , 1980 | Propranolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.07 [0.64; 1.77] fatal and nonfatal MI 1.03 [0.51; 2.07] cardiac death 0.62 [0.33; 1.15] reinfarction 1.03 [0.51; 2.07] | BHAT , 1982 | Propranolol vs placebo | all cause death 0.74 [0.60; 0.91] cardiovascular death 0.74 [0.60; 0.93] cardiac death 0.73 [0.58; 0.91] | | reinfarction 0.85 [0.66; 1.10] | Hansteen , 1982 | Propranolol vs placebo | Sudden death 0.49 [0.24; 0.98] | fatal and nonfatal MI 1.49 [1.03; 2.18] | all cause death 0.69 [0.42; 1.11] cardiac death 0.69 [0.47; 1.00] reinfarction 0.77 [0.41; 1.45] cardiac event (fatal and non fatal ) 0.73 [0.49; 1.10] | Wilcox , 1980 | Propranolol or atenolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.94 [0.56; 1.58] cardiovascular death 0.86 [0.50; 1.47] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Balcon , 1966 | Propranolol (n=56) vs. (n=58) | |
Double Sample size: 56/58 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 28 days | Barber , 1976 | Propranolol (n=52) vs. (n=47) | |
No Sample size: 52/47 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 4 weeks | Clausen , 1966 | Propranolol (n=66) vs. (n=64) | |
Unclear Sample size: 66/64 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 days | Curtis , 1991 | Propranolol 240mg/d (n=18) vs. placebo (n=12) | patients with recent infarction | Double Sample size: 18/12 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.4 days | Dotremont , 1968 | Propranolol (n=36) vs. (n=36) | |
No Sample size: 36/36 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 36 weeks | Gupta , 1982 | Propranolol (n=25) vs. (n=25) | |
Unclear Sample size: 25/25 Primary endpoint: FU duration: Unclear | Gupta , 1984 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=15) vs. (n=15) | |
No Sample size: 15/15 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 72 hours | Hutton , 1979 | Propranolol (n=16) vs. (n=13) | |
Unclear Sample size: 16/13 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 days | Kahler , 1968 | Propranolol (n=38) vs. (n=31) | |
Double Sample size: 38/31 Primary endpoint: FU duration: Up to 35 days | Ledwich , 1968 | Propranolol (n=40) vs. (n=40) | |
Double Sample size: 40/40 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days | Mueller , 1980 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=35) vs. (n=35) | |
Double Sample size: 35/35 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Multicentre , 1966 | Propranolol (n=100) vs. (n=95) | |
Double Sample size: 100/95 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 28 days | Nigam , 1983 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=20) vs. (n=20) | |
Unclear Sample size: 20/20 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 week | Norris , 1968 | Propranolol (n=226) vs. (n=228) | |
Double Sample size: 226/228 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 weeks | Norris , 1978 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=20) vs. (n=23) | |
No Sample size: 20/23 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Norris , 1984 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=364) vs. (n=371) | |
No Sample size: 364/371 Primary endpoint: FU duration: In hospital | Peter , 1978 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=47) vs. (n=48) | |
No Sample size: 47/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Pitt , 1976 | Propranolol (n=9) vs. (n=8) | |
Double Sample size: 9/8 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 days | Roberts , 1984 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=134) vs. (n=135) | |
Single Sample size: 134/135 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 36 months | Singh , 1985 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=8) vs. (n=7) | |
No Sample size: 8/7 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 60 hours | Sloman , 1967 | Propranolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=26) vs. (n=23) | |
No Sample size: 26/23 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Aronow , 1997 | Propranolol 30 mg 3 times daily (n=79) vs. no propranolol (n=79)
| patients >=62 years of age with New York Heart Association functional class II or III CHF, prior Qwave myocardial infarction, and a LV ejection fraction <40% after 2 months of treatment with diuretics and ACE inhibitors | Parallel groups Sample size: 79/79 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 1 year | Baber , 1980 | Propranolol 40 mg three times a day (n=355) vs. placebo (n=365) | Men and women with anterior MI | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 355/365 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 9 months | BHAT , 1982 | Propranolol 180 or 240 mg/day (n=1916) vs. placebo (n=1921) | mean and women who has experienced at least one MI | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1916/1921 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality FU duration: 25 months | Hansteen , 1982 | Propranolol 40mg four times a day (n=278) vs. placebo (n=282) | high-risk patients who survived acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 278/282 Primary endpoint: NA (sudden cardiac death may be) FU duration: 1 year | Wilcox , 1980 | Propranolol 40 mg three times daily(initial dose intravenously) n=132 or atenolol 50 mg twice daily n=127 (n=259) vs. placebo (n=129) | patients with acute MI within the past 24 hours | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 259/129 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 1 year |
|
beta-blockers | sotalol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Lloyd , 1988 | Sotalol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Lloyd , 1988 | Sotalol (initial dose intravenously) (n=15) vs. (n=15) | |
No Sample size: 15/15 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 72 hours |
|
beta-blockers | timolol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Campbell , 1984 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.48 [0.05; 4.82] | Federman , 1984 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | ICSG , 1984 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.73 [0.17; 3.14] | Ranganathan , 1988 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.36 [0.04; 3.36] | Tonkin , 1981 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.10 [0.07; 16.96] | UKCSG , 1983 | Timolol vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.79 [0.22; 2.77] | Norwegian Multicentre Study Group , 1981 | Timolol vs placebo | all cause death 0.64 [0.51; 0.81] cardiovascular death 0.58 [0.45; 0.75] Sudden death 0.49 [0.35; 0.69] cardiac death 0.58 [0.45; 0.75] reinfarction 0.62 [0.48; 0.80] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Campbell , 1984 | Timolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=20) vs. (n=19) | |
Unclear Sample size: 20/19 Primary endpoint: FU duration: In hospital | Federman , 1984 | Timolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=50) vs. (n=50) | |
Unclear Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 28 days | ICSG , 1984 | Timolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=73) vs. (n=71) | patients within four hours after onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction | Double Sample size: 73/71 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Ranganathan , 1988 | Timolol (initial dose intravenously) (n=45) vs. (n=49) | |
Double IV open orally Sample size: 45/49 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 28 days | Tonkin , 1981 | Timolol (n=42) vs. (n=46) | |
Double Sample size: 42/46 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year | UKCSG , 1983 | Timolol (n=56) vs. (n=55) | |
Double Sample size: 56/55 Primary endpoint: FU duration: To discharge | Norwegian Multicentre Study Group , 1981 | Timolol 10mg twice daily (n=945) vs. placebo (n=939) | patients surviving acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 945/939 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 17 months |
|
beta-blockers | xamoterol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
McMurray , 1991 | Xamoterol vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
McMurray , 1991 | Xamoterol (n=25) vs. (n=26) | |
Double Sample size: 25/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days |
|
calcium channel blockers | diltiazem | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Machecourt, 1986 | diltiazem vs | | | all cause death 0.49 [0.09; 2.50] confirmed myocardial infarction 0.97 [0.84; 1.13] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Machecourt, 1986 | Diltiazem 360mg IV/24h plus 360mh/24h orally (n=38) vs. (n=37) | | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 38/37 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: 21 days |
|
calcium channel blockers | diltiazem | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Gibson, 1986 | diltiazem vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.23 [0.52; 2.93] | MDPIT, 1988 | diltiazem vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.00 [0.82; 1.22] cardiac death 1.03 [0.81; 1.30] reinfarction 0.85 [0.66; 1.10] | Zannad, 1988 | diltiazem vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 1.06 [0.94; 1.20] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Gibson, 1986 | Diltiazem 90mgx4 (n=287) vs. placebo (n=289) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 287/289 Primary endpoint: reinfarction FU duration: 14 days | MDPIT, 1988 | Diltiazem 60mgx4 (n=1234) vs. placebo (n=1232) | Patient aged 25 to 75 years, admitted to coronary care units with a documented acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1234/1232 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 25 months (at least 12 months) | Zannad, 1988 | Diltiazem 10-20mg/h IV, 4x60mg orraly (n=17) vs. placebo (n=17) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 17/17 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: |
|
calcium channel blockers | nifedipine | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Muller, 1984 | nifedipine vs | | | all cause death 3.31 [0.71; 15.51] confirmed myocardial infarction 0.99 [0.86; 1.13] | Gordon, 1984 | nifedipine vs | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | MI study group, 1979 | nifedipine vs | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Muller, 1984 | Nifedipine 20mgx6 (n=93) vs. (n=88) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 93/88 Primary endpoint: infarct development FU duration: 14 days | Gordon, 1984 | Nifedipine 10 mgx4 (n=13) vs. (n=13) | | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 13/13 Primary endpoint: haemodynamics FU duration: 1 day | MI study group, 1979 | Nifedipine 3-4x60mg (n=904) vs. (n=888) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 904/888 Primary endpoint: mortality FU duration: |
|
calcium channel blockers | nifedipine | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 11 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Eisenberg, 1985 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.22 [NaN; NaN] | Bradagan, 1986 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.59 [0.53; 4.74] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.24 [0.81; 1.89] | Jaffe, 1987 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | Gottlieb, 1988 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.06 [0.28; 4.07] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.12 [0.97; 1.29] | Erbel, 1988 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.69 [0.65; 4.41] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | SPRINT I, 1988 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.01 [0.73; 1.42] cardiac death 1.01 [0.70; 1.47] reinfarction 0.92 [0.63; 1.34] | SPRINT II, 1993 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.16 [0.90; 1.51] confirmed myocardial infarction 0.96 [0.92; 1.01] | Loogna, 1985 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | TRENT (Wilcox), 1986 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [0.95; 1.04] | Walker, 1988 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 0.98 [0.86; 1.11] | Sirnes, 1984 | nifedipine vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 0.92 [0.77; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Eisenberg, 1985 | Nifedipine 20mgx4 (n=25) vs. placebo (n=25) | patients with nontransmural myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 25/25 Primary endpoint: chest pain FU duration: 12 days | Bradagan, 1986 | Nifedipine 10mgx4 (n=60) vs. placebo (n=61) | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction within 6hrs | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 60/61 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: 2 days | Jaffe, 1987 | Nifedipine 6x20mg (n=13) vs. placebo (n=9) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 13/9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 7 days | Gottlieb, 1988 | Nifedipine 10 to 30mgx4 (n=64) vs. placebo (n=68) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 64/68 Primary endpoint: LV function FU duration: 42 days | Erbel, 1988 | Nifedipine 20mgx3 (n=74) vs. placebo (n=75) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 74/75 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: hospital stay | SPRINT I, 1988 | Nifedipine 10mgx3 (n=1130) vs. placebo (n=1146) | patient surviving MI 7 and 21 days after admission | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1130/1146 Primary endpoint: mortality FU duration: 1 year | SPRINT II, 1993 | Nifedipine 20mgx3 started within 3hr of hopsital admission for 6 months (n=682) vs. placebo (n=676) | men and women with suspected acute MI | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 682/676 Primary endpoint: two primary endpoints: non fatal MI and mortality FU duration: 6 months | Loogna, 1985 | Nifedipine 4x10mg (n=23) vs. placebo (n=34) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 6 h from onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 23/34 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: | TRENT (Wilcox), 1986 | Nifedipine 4x10mg (n=2240) vs. placebo (n=2251)
| patients with suspected myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2240/2251 Primary endpoint: mortality FU duration: 28 days
| Walker, 1988 | Nifedipine 6x10mg for 48hrs (n=217) vs. placebo (n=217) | patients with suspected myocardial infarction within six hours from the onset of chest pain | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 217/217 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: | Sirnes, 1984 | Nifedipine 5x10mg (n=112) vs. placebo (n=115)
| patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 112/115 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: 42 days
|
|
calcium channel blockers | verapamil | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Bussman, 1984 | verapamil vs control | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | DAVIT I, 1984 | verapamil vs placebo | | | | Crea, 1985 | verapamil vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] confirmed myocardial infarction 1.00 [1.00; 1.00] | DAVIT II, 1990 | verapamil vs placebo | | | all cause death 0.82 [0.63; 1.05] cardiac death 0.80 [0.61; 1.05] | CRIS, 1996 | verapamil vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.06 [0.64; 1.73] cardiac death 0.97 [0.54; 1.75] reinfarction 0.81 [0.54; 1.22] | Danish study, 1984 | verapamil vs placebo | | | confirmed myocardial infarction 0.99 [0.92; 1.07] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Bussman, 1984 | Verapamil 5 to 10 mg/h IV (n=29) vs. no treatment (n=25) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 29/25 Primary endpoint: infract size FU duration: 2 days | DAVIT I, 1984 | verapamil 120mgx3 (n=1751) vs. placebo (n=1747) | | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1751/1747 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality FU duration: 6 months | Crea, 1985 | verapamil 80mgx3 (n=8) vs. placebo (n=9) | patients admitted to the coronary care unit with transmural acute myocardial infarction | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 8/9 Primary endpoint: angina and reinfarction FU duration: 10 days | DAVIT II, 1990 | verapamil 120mgx3 for 18 months (n=878) vs. placebo (n=897) | patients <76years with diagnosis of acute MI | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 878/897 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality and firstmajor event FU duration: 16 months | CRIS, 1996 | verapamil retard 360 mg daily (n=531) vs. placebo (n=542) | patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 531/542 Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality FU duration: 23.5 months | Danish study, 1984 | verapamil 0.1mg/kg IV plus 3x120mg orally (n=1729) vs. placebo (n=1718) | patients under 75 years of age admitted to the CCU with a suspicion of acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1729/1718 Primary endpoint: mortality FU duration: 12 months |
|
increasing hemoglobin concentration | taspoglutide | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
HEBE III, 2010 | epoetin alfa vs placebo | | | MACE 0.48 [0.22; 1.04] Cardiovascular death 0.51 [0.05; 5.54] Emergency PCI for in-stent thrombosis/reinfarction/unstable angina 0.56 [0.19; 1.65] Stroke 1.01 [0.06; 16.09] Heart failure 0.14 [0.02; 1.17] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
HEBE III, 2010 | single bolus of 60,000 IU epoetin alfa administered intravenously within three hours after a successful PCI (n=263) vs. control (n=266) | patients with a first ST-elevation MI and a successful PCI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 263/266 Primary endpoint: left ventricular ejection fraction FU duration: 6 weeks |
|
Late revascularisation | PTCA | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TOMIIS, 1994 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | Death 0.76 [0.05; 11.39] CHF NaN [NaN; NaN] Death or MI 1.52 [0.15; 15.55] MI ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Horie et al, 1998 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | CHF 0.09 [0.01; 0.66] | | Death 0.22 [0.03; 1.90] Death or MI 0.35 [0.12; 1.04] MI 0.38 [0.11; 1.37] | TOAT, 2002 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | Death 2.13 [0.20; 22.31] CHF 0.71 [0.22; 2.28] Death or MI 5.31 [0.66; 43.04] MI 3.19 [0.35; 29.09] | DECOPI, 2004 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | Death 0.84 [0.34; 2.09] CHF 0.57 [0.14; 2.31] Death or MI 0.94 [0.43; 2.08] MI 1.26 [0.29; 5.49] | Silva et al, 2005 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | Death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CHF 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Death or MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] MI NaN [NaN; NaN] | OAT, 2006 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | Death 1.04 [0.78; 1.38] CHF 0.98 [0.65; 1.48] Death or MI 1.20 [0.95; 1.51] MI 1.34 [0.92; 1.97] | TOSCA-2, 2006 | late PTCA vs no PTCA | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TOMIIS, 1994 | late PTCA (n=25) vs. no PTCA (n=19) | patients with a recent, first Q-wave myocardial infarction and an occluded infarct-related coronary artery | open Sample size: 25/19 Primary endpoint: Left ventricular ejection fraction FU duration: 4 months, fixed | Horie et al, 1998 | late revascularization by primary PTCA (n=44) vs. no PTCA (n=39) | patients with initial Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction >24 hours after onset | Sample size: 44/39 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 50 months, mean | TOAT, 2002 | late revascularization (late intervention and stent to the LAD + medical therapy) (n=32) vs. conservative therapy (medical therapy) (n=34) | symptom-free patients after acute myocardial infarction | open Sample size: 32/34 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months, fixed | DECOPI, 2004 | percutaneous revascularization carried out 2-15 days after symptom onset (n=109) vs. medical treatment (n=103) | patients with a first Q-wave myocardial infarction and an occluded infarct vessel | open Sample size: 109/103 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 34 months, mean | Silva et al, 2005 | percutaneous coronary intervention (n=18) vs. conservative therapy (no-PCI) (n=18) | patients with occluded infarct-related artery between 12 h and 14 days post-anterior MI were | open Sample size: 18/18 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months, fixed | OAT, 2006 | routine PCI and stenting (n=1082) vs. optimal medical therapy alone (n=1084) | stable patients who had total occlusion of the infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days after myocardial infarction and who met a high-risk criterion ( | open Sample size: 1082/1084 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 35 months, mean | TOSCA-2, 2006 | PCI with stenting (n=195) vs. optimal medical therapy alone (n=186) | patients with an occluded native infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days after MI | open Sample size: 195/186 Primary endpoint: IRA patency and change in LV ejection fraction FU duration: 12 months, fixed |
|
myocardial revascularization | abciximab | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy Abciximab inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in Zorman, 2002 Abciximab inferior to primary intervention in terms of Final TIMI 3 flow in ReoPro-BRIDGING (Gyongyosi), 2004 Abciximab inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in Bellandi, 2006 Abciximab + reteplase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term major bleeding in patients treated in FINESSE (combination-facilitated PCI), 2008 | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ERAMI (Mesquita Gabriel), 2003 | Abciximab vs primary intervention | | | Short-term death 0.84 [0.25; 2.90] Short-term major bleeding 2.11 [0.41; 10.83] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.16 [0.94; 1.44] Initial TIMI 3 flow 1.41 [0.34; 5.86] | REOMOBILE (Arntz), 2003 | Abciximab vs primary intervention | | | Short-term death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Short-term major bleeding 0.92 [0.06; 14.35] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction ∞ [NaN; ∞] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 1.23 [0.29; 5.22] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.09 [0.92; 1.29] Initial TIMI 3 flow 1.08 [0.73; 1.61] | Zorman, 2002 | Abciximab vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 9.00 [1.18; 68.70] | Short-term death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Short-term major bleeding 1.45 [0.74; 2.85] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.98 [0.87; 1.11] | ReoPro-BRIDGING (Gyongyosi), 2004 | Abciximab vs primary intervention | | Final TIMI 3 flow 2.10 [1.47; 3.00] | Short-term death NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term major bleeding 0.48 [0.05; 5.01] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Initial TIMI 3 flow 3.86 [0.90; 16.55] | Bellandi, 2006 | Abciximab vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 3.46 [1.07; 11.22] | Short-term death 1.04 [0.07; 15.76] Short-term major bleeding 0.52 [0.05; 5.39] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation NaN [NaN; NaN] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.12 [0.95; 1.33] | | Abciximab + reteplase vs primary intervention | | | | FINESSE (combination-facilitated PCI), 2008 | Abciximab + reteplase vs primary intervention | | Short-term major bleeding in patients treated 1.81 [1.07; 3.05] | Short-term death 1.16 [0.75; 1.79] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 1.10 [0.55; 2.19] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ERAMI (Mesquita Gabriel), 2003 | facilated PCI with Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion (n=36) vs. primary intervention (n=38) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 36/38 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | REOMOBILE (Arntz), 2003 | facilated PCI with Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion (n=52) vs. primary intervention (n=48) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 52/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | Zorman, 2002 | facilated PCI with Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion (n=56) vs. primary intervention (n=56) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 56/56 Primary endpoint: FU duration: In hospital | ReoPro-BRIDGING (Gyongyosi), 2004 | facilated PCI with Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion (n=28) vs. primary intervention (n=27) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 28/27 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | Bellandi, 2006 | facilated PCI with Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion (n=27) vs. primary intervention (n=28) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 27/28 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | BRAVE (Kastrati), 2004 | facilated PCI with Abciximab, 0·25 mg/kg intravenouse bolus, 0·125 µg/kg per min infusion and reteplase 5 units (intravenous double bolus) (n=125) vs. (n=128) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 125/128 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days | FINESSE (combination-facilitated PCI), 2008 | combination-facilitated PCI with abciximab plus half-dose reteplase (n=828) vs. primary PCI (abciximab
administered immediately before the procedure) (n=806) | patients
with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; symptom duration <6h | open Parallel groups Sample size: 828/806 Primary endpoint: death, VF before 48h, cardioganic shock, CHF FU duration: 90 days |
|
myocardial revascularization | alteplase | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy alteplase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in LIMI (Vermeer), 1999 alteplase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in PACT (Ross,), 1999 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
LIMI (Vermeer), 1999 | alteplase vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 5.20 [2.63; 10.29] | Short-term death 1.22 [0.39; 3.81] Short-term major bleeding in patients treated NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 4.05 [0.46; 35.42] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 6.08 [0.75; 49.29] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.89 [0.78; 1.02] | PACT (Ross,), 1999 | alteplase vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 2.19 [1.60; 2.99] | Short-term death 1.11 [0.48; 2.57] Short-term major bleeding in patients treated 1.05 [0.62; 1.77] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 1.13 [0.44; 2.90] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.98 [0.92; 1.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
LIMI (Vermeer), 1999 | facilated PCI with Alteplase 50 mg(intravenous bolus)mag (n=74) vs. primary intervention (n=75) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 74/75 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 42-day | PACT (Ross,), 1999 | facilated PCI with alteplase 50 mg (intravenous bolus) (n=302) vs. primary intervention (n=304) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 302/304 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day |
|
myocardial revascularization | anistreplase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TEAM 2, 1991 | anistreplase vs streptokinase | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TEAM 2, 1991 | anistreplase (30 units/2-5 min) (n=183) vs. streptokinase (1.5 million units/60 min (n=176) | less than 76 years of age with electrocardiographic ST segment elevation who could be treated within 4 hours of symptom onset | double blind Sample size: 183/176 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
myocardial revascularization | APSAC | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AIMS, 1988 | APSAC vs placebo | Mortalité à long terme 0.62 [0.47; 0.82] Mortalité précoce 0.53 [0.37; 0.76] | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.02 [0.30; 3.49] AVC précoce 1.02 [0.26; 4.04] | German Multicenter Trial, 1988 | APSAC vs placebo | Mortalité précoce 0.44 [0.21; 0.95] | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.86 [0.65; 5.33] | APSIM, 1989 | APSAC vs control | | | Mortalité précoce 1.24 [0.43; 3.58] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AIMS, 1988 | APSAC 30U IV in 5 min (n=624) vs. Placebo (n=634) | Hommes et femmes, < 70 ans | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 624/634 Primary endpoint: 1y death FU duration: 1 y | German Multicenter Trial, 1988 | APSAC 30 unités en IV en 5 min, puis héparine en IV (17 U/kg/h) 4 h après l'injection d'APSAC (n=162) vs. Héparine 5000 U en bolus en IV, puis 17 U/kg/h (n=151) | Hommes et femmes, < 70 ans | Parallel groups Sample size: 162/151 Primary endpoint: in hospital death FU duration: 28 jours | APSIM, 1989 | APSAC 30 U over 5 min (n=112) vs. control (conventional heparin therapy, 5,000 IU in a bolus injection) (n=119) | patients with a first acute myocardial infarction within 5 h after the onset of symptoms | open Parallel groups Sample size: 112/119 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 weeks |
|
myocardial revascularization | APSAC | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS III (SK/APSAC), 1992 | APSAC vs streptokinase | | | Mortalité à long terme 1.02 [0.96; 1.08] Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.85 [0.67; 1.09] Mortalité précoce 1.00 [0.94; 1.08] AVC précoce 0.82 [0.66; 1.02] | TEAM 3, 1992 | APSAC vs t-PA | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS III (SK/APSAC), 1992 | Streptokinase 1.5 MU infused over about 1 h (n=13780) vs. anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC), anistreplase: 30 U over about 3 min (n=13773) | patients within 24 h of the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Plan factoriel 3 (ou 4) *2 Sample size: 13780/13773 Primary endpoint: Mortality 35-day FU duration: 6 mo | TEAM 3, 1992 | APSAC, 30 U/2 to 5 min (n=325) vs. rt-PA, 100 mg/3 h, (n=0) | patient with ST elevalation within 4h of the onset of symptoms | double blind Sample size: 325/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 months |
|
myocardial revascularization | eptifibatide | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy Eptifibatide inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in INTAMI (Zeymer), 2005 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
INTAMI (Zeymer), 2005 | Eptifibatide vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 3.33 [1.34; 8.28] | Short-term death 0.92 [0.14; 6.31] Short-term major bleeding 0.92 [0.14; 6.31] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction ∞ [NaN; ∞] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 1.85 [0.17; 19.76] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.04 [0.88; 1.23] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
INTAMI (Zeymer), 2005 | facilated PCI with Eptifibatide; 180 µg/kg intravenous double bolus, 2·0 µg/kg per min infusion (n=53) vs. primary intervention (n=49) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 53/49 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day |
|
myocardial revascularization | lanoteplase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
InTIME-II, 2000 | lanoteplase vs accelerated t-PA | | | Mortalité à long terme 0.97 [0.88; 1.07] Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.83 [0.53; 1.31] Mortalité précoce 1.02 [0.90; 1.16] AVC précoce 1.22 [0.94; 1.59] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
InTIME-II, 2000 | lanoteplase 120 KU. kg(-1) as a single intravenous bolus (n=10038) vs. up to 100 mg accelerated alteplase given over 90 min (n=5022) | patients presenting within 6 h of onset of ST elevation acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 10038/5022 Primary endpoint: Mortality 30-day FU duration: 30 days |
|
myocardial revascularization | PCI | versus no systematic PCI No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
WEST, 2006 | systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI | | | In-hospital death 0.24 [0.03; 2.11] Major bleeding 1.92 [0.18; 20.88] stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] Reinfarction 0.64 [0.24; 1.74] | CAPITAL AMI, 2005 | systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI | | | In-hospital death 0.98 [0.20; 4.70] Major bleeding 1.14 [0.40; 3.25] stroke 0.98 [0.06; 15.36] Reinfarction 0.41 [0.15; 1.11] | GRACIA-1, 2004 | systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI | | | In-hospital death 0.57 [0.26; 1.26] Major bleeding 2.02 [0.37; 10.95] stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Reinfarction 0.61 [0.27; 1.36] | SIAM III, 2002 | systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI | | | In-hospital death 0.44 [0.14; 1.37] Major bleeding 1.32 [0.48; 3.63] stroke 0.99 [0.14; 6.85] Reinfarction 0.99 [0.14; 6.85] | PRAGUE, 2000 | systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI | | | In-hospital death 0.66 [0.34; 1.30] Major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] stroke 2.97 [0.31; 28.07] Reinfarction 0.50 [0.19; 1.27] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
WEST, 2006 | TNK and mandatory invasive study <= 24 h, including rescue PCI for reperfusion failure (n=104) vs. tenecteplase (TNK) and usual care (n=100) | STEMI patients (> 4 mm ST-elevation/deviation) within 6 h of symptom onse | Parallel groups Sample size: 104/100 Primary endpoint: death, re-MI, refractory ischaemia, HF, shock, major ventricular arrhythmia FU duration: 30 days | CAPITAL AMI, 2005 | TNK-facilitated angioplasty (n=86) vs. TNK alone (n=84) | patients with high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | Parallel groups Sample size: 86/84 Primary endpoint: death, reinfarction, recurrent unstable ischemia, stroke FU duration: 6 months | GRACIA-1, 2004 | angiography and intervention if indicated within 24 h of thrombolysis (n=248) vs. ischaemia-guided conservative approach (n=251) | patients with thrombolysed STEMI (with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) | Parallel groups Sample size: 248/251 Primary endpoint: death, reinfarction, or revascularisation FU duration: 12 months | SIAM III, 2002 | immediate stenting after thrombolysis (n=82) vs. conservative treatment (n=81) | patients receiving thrombolysis in AMI (<12 h) | Parallel groups Sample size: 82/81 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | PRAGUE, 2000 | thrombolysis during immediate transportation for coronary angioplasty (n=100) vs. thrombolysis in a community hospital (n=99) | patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction presenting to community hospitals | Sample size: 100/99 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months |
|
myocardial revascularization | PCI | versus ballon angioplasty No demonstrated result for efficacy | 13 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Jaksch, 1998 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | revascularization (6 months) 0.35 [0.15; 0.81] revascularization (30 days) 0.29 [0.10; 0.86] | | death (6 months) 0.71 [0.23; 2.22] reinfarctus (6 months) 0.38 [0.10; 1.40] death (30 days) 0.60 [0.15; 2.48] reinfraction (30 days) 0.38 [0.10; 1.40] | GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | death (30 days) 0.50 [0.10; 2.61] bleeding 1.00 [0.06; 15.57] revascularization (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] reinfraction (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] revascularization (12 months) 0.70 [0.29; 1.70] | Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | revascularization (6 months) 0.22 [0.08; 0.62] reinfarctus (12 months) 0.10 [0.01; 0.79] revascularization (12 months) 0.39 [0.18; 0.85] | | death (6 months) 0.68 [0.12; 4.02] reinfarctus (6 months) 0.13 [0.02; 1.01] death (30 days) 0.68 [0.12; 4.02] bleeding 2.40 [0.64; 9.03] revascularization (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] death (12 months) 0.77 [0.18; 3.36] reinfraction (30 days) 0.21 [0.02; 1.73] | stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | revascularization (6 months) 0.45 [0.31; 0.66] revascularization (30 days) 0.35 [0.14; 0.87] | | death (6 months) 1.55 [0.76; 3.16] reinfarctus (6 months) 1.08 [0.46; 2.51] death (30 days) 1.96 [0.85; 4.53] bleeding 1.33 [0.72; 2.45] death (12 months) 1.82 [0.96; 3.44] reinfraction (30 days) 0.39 [0.08; 2.01] reinfarctus (12 months) 1.06 [0.49; 2.30] | PASTA (Saito), 1999 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | revascularization (6 months) 0.50 [0.26; 0.94] revascularization (12 months) 0.52 [0.28; 0.96] | | death (6 months) 0.63 [0.16; 2.52] reinfarctus (6 months) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] death (30 days) 0.42 [0.08; 2.08] bleeding 1.04 [0.07; 16.37] revascularization (30 days) 0.46 [0.15; 1.44] death (12 months) 0.52 [0.14; 2.00] reinfraction (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] reinfarctus (12 months) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | death (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] revascularization (30 days) 0.67 [0.44; 1.03] | STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | death (6 months) 2.18 [0.20; 23.66] reinfarctus (6 months) 0.73 [0.21; 2.50] revascularization (6 months) 0.64 [0.37; 1.09] death (30 days) ∞ [NaN; ∞] bleeding 0.73 [0.12; 4.26] revascularization (30 days) 0.91 [0.29; 2.88] death (12 months) 1.63 [0.28; 9.58] reinfraction (30 days) 1.09 [0.28; 4.24] reinfarctus (12 months) 0.73 [0.21; 2.50] revascularization (12 months) 0.62 [0.36; 1.05] | PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001 | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | revascularization (12 months) 0.29 [0.12; 0.73] | | death (30 days) 2.00 [0.19; 21.26] bleeding 0.67 [0.20; 2.20] revascularization (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] death (12 months) 0.50 [0.16; 1.54] reinfraction (30 days) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] reinfarctus (12 months) 0.25 [0.03; 2.15] | | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | | | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | | | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | | | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | | | primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Jaksch, 1998 | Various stent (n=231) vs. (n=231) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 231/231 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998 | balloon angioplasty followed electively with Gianturco Roubin II stents (n=52) vs. conventional balloon angioplasty (n=52) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after onset | open Parallel groups Sample size: 52/52 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998 | Stent Palmaz-Schatz (n=112) vs. balloon angioplasty (n=115) | Patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 112/115 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999 | angioplasty with Stent Heparin-coated (n=452) vs. angioplasty alone (n=448) | patients with acute myocardial infarction and with vessels suitable for stenting | open Parallel groups Sample size: 452/448 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | PASTA (Saito), 1999 | Stent Palmaz-Schatz (n=67) vs. primary balloon angioplasty (n=70) | patients with AMI within 12 hr from onset | open Parallel groups Sample size: 67/70 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999 | Stent Palmaz-Schatz (n=110) vs. (n=112) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 110/112 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000 | systematic stenting with Stent Wiktor (n=101) vs. conventional balloon angioplasty (n=110) | patients with AMI <12 h from symptom onset, with an occluded native coronary artery | open Parallel groups Sample size: 101/110 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001 | Stent Wiktor GX (n=44) vs. primary angioplasty (n=44) | patients within 24 hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 44/44 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 months | FRESCO, 1998 | elective stenting after successful primary PTCA (n=75) vs. no further intervention after successful primary PTCA (n=75) | patient with successful primary PTCA | open Parallel groups Sample size: 75/75 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | CADILLAC abciximab., 2002 | stenting plus abciximab therapy (n=524) vs. PTCA plus abciximab therapy (n=528) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 524/528 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | CADILLAC (no abciximab), 2002 | stenting alone with the MultiLink stent (n=512) vs. PTCA alone (n=518) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 512/518 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | ZWOLLE 6, 2005 | stenting (n=785) vs. balloon angioplasty (n=763) randomisation before angiography | unselected patients with STEMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 785/763 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | STOPAMI 3, 2004 | coronary artery stenting (n=305) vs. PTCA (n=306) | patients with AMI ineligible for thrombolysis (lack of ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram, late presentation >12 h after symptom onset, and contraindications to thrombolysis) | open Parallel groups Sample size: 305/306 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months |
|
myocardial revascularization | PCI | versus thrombolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
STAT, 2001 | primary stenting vs accelerated t-PA | | | | C-PORT, 2002 | primary PCI vs accelerated t-PA | | | | STOPAMI 2, 2002 | primary stenting vs immediate thrombolysis | | | | senior PAMI, 2005 | primary PCI vs Thrombolysis | death/reinfarction/stroke 0.64 [0.41; 1.00] | | stroke 0.36 [0.07; 1.86] in-hospital mortality 0.76 [0.46; 1.25] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
STAT, 2001 | primary stenting (n=62) vs. accelerated t-PA (n=61) | patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 62/61 Primary endpoint: death, reinfarction, stroke, TVR FU duration: 6 months | C-PORT, 2002 | primary PCI without on-site cardiac surgery (n=225) vs. accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (n=226) | thrombolytic-eligible patients with acute MI of less than 12 hours' duration associated with ST-segment elevation | open Parallel groups Sample size: 225/226 Primary endpoint: death, recurrent MI, and stroke FU duration: 6 months | STOPAMI 2, 2002 | stenting combined with abciximab (n=81) vs. fibrinolysis by alteplase combined with abciximab (n=81) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 12 h of onset of symptoms | open Parallel groups Sample size: 81/81 Primary endpoint: salvage index FU duration: | senior PAMI, 2005 | primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=252) vs. intravenous thrombolytic therapy (n=229) | elderly (age >= 70 years) patients with acute myocardial infarction | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 252/229 Primary endpoint: death or disabling stroke FU duration: 30 days |
|
myocardial revascularization | primary angioplasty | versus thrombolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy primary ballon angioplasty inferior to streptokinase in terms of MACE in Zwolle, 1994 primary ballon angioplasty inferior to streptokinase in terms of reinfarction in Zwolle, 1994 primary ballon angioplasty inferior to streptokinase in terms of in-hospital mortality in Zwolle, 1994 | 15 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Zwolle, 1994 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | MACE 0.21 [0.08; 0.55] reinfarction 0.13 [0.03; 0.56] in-hospital mortality 0.27 [0.08; 0.94] | major bleeding 0.87 [0.35; 2.20] stroke 0.33 [0.03; 3.11] | Ribeiro, 1993 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | | | Grinfeld, 1996 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | | | Zijlstra, 1997 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | | | DeWood, 1989 | primary ballon angioplasty vs duteplase | | | | PAMI, 1993 | primary ballon angioplasty vs t-PA | | | | Gibbons, 1993 | primary ballon angioplasty vs duteplase | | | | Ribichini, 1996 | primary ballon angioplasty vs accelerated t-PA | | | | Garcia, 1997 | primary ballon angioplasty vs accelerated t-PA | | | | GUSTO 2B, 1997 | primary ballon angioplasty vs accelerated t-PA | | | | DANAMI-2, 1997 | primary ballon angioplasty vs accelerated t-PA | | | | Zijlstra , 1993 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | | | Akhras, 1997 | primary ballon angioplasty vs streptokinase | | | | O'Neill, 1986 | primary ballon angioplasty vs intracoronary streptokinase | | | | TRIANA, 2009 | primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase | | | MACE 1.46 [0.81; 2.63] stroke 4.03 [0.44; 36.86] reinfarction 1.60 [0.60; 4.26] in-hospital mortality 1.31 [0.67; 2.56] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Zwolle, 1994 | primary PTCA (n=152) vs. streptokinase 1.5 M IU over 1h (n=149) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 152/149 Primary endpoint: FU duration: discharge | Ribeiro, 1993 | primary PTCA (n=50) vs. streptokinase 1.2 M IU over 1h (n=50) | patients with ST segment elevation within 6 h of the onset of chest pain | open Parallel groups Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: discharge | Grinfeld, 1996 | primary PTCA (n=54) vs. streptokinase 1.5 M IU over 1h (n=58) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 54/58 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 d | Zijlstra, 1997 | primary PTCA (n=45) vs. streptokinase 1.5 M IU over 1h (n=50) | atients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 45/50 Primary endpoint: death, nonfatal stroke or reinfarcti FU duration: 6 months | DeWood, 1989 | primary PTCA (n=46) vs. duteplase 0.5 MU/kg for 1 h then 0.7 MU/kg/h for 3h (n=44) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 46/44 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 d | PAMI, 1993 | primary PTCA (n=195) vs. t-PA 100mg (or 1.25mg/kg for patients weighting less than 65kg) over 3 h (n=200) | patients who presented within 12 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 195/200 Primary endpoint: FU duration: discharge | Gibbons, 1993 | primary PTCA (n=47) vs. duteplase 0.6 MU/kg over 5h (n=56) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 47/56 Primary endpoint: FU duration: discharge | Ribichini, 1996 | primary PTCA (n=24) vs. accelerated alteplase 90 min (15 mg IV bolus followed by an infusion of 0.75 mg/kg over 30min not to exceed 50mg, and then 0.5 mg/kg over the next 60min not to exceed 35mg for a total maximun of 100mg) (n=26) | | open Parallel groups Sample size: 24/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: discharge | Garcia, 1997 | primary PTCA (n=95) vs. accelerated t-PA 90 min (15 mg IV bolus followed by an infusion of 0.75 mg/kg over 30min not to exceed 50mg, and then 0.5 mg/kg over the next 60min not to exceed 35mg for a total maximun of 100mg) (n=94) | patients with anterior AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 95/94 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 d | GUSTO 2B, 1997 | primary PTCA (n=573) vs. accelerated t-PA 90 min (15 mg IV bolus followed by an infusion of 0.75 mg/kg over 30min not to exceed 50mg, and then 0.5 mg/kg over the next 60min not to exceed 35mg for a total maximun of 100mg) (n=565) | patients within 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction (with ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram) | open factorial design Sample size: 573/565 Primary endpoint: death, nonfatal reinfarction, and nonfatal disabling stroke FU duration: 30 d | DANAMI-2, 1997 | angioplasty (n=-9) vs. accelerated treatment with intravenous alteplase (n=-9) | patients who received thrombolytic treatment for a first acute myocardial infarction and with inducible myocardial ischemia (either symptomatic angina pectoris presenting spontaneously > 36 hours after admission or during a predischarge exercise test or ST changes during exercise compatible with ischemia) | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: mortality, reinfarction, and admission with unstable angina FU duration: 2.4y | Zijlstra , 1993 | immediate coronary angioplasty (without previous thrombolytic therapy) (n=70) vs. intravenous streptokinase (n=72) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 70/72 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Akhras, 1997 | primary angioplasty (n=42) vs. streptokinase (n=45) | patient within 12hr from onset of AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 42/45 Primary endpoint: none FU duration: | O'Neill, 1986 | coronary angioplasty (n=-9) vs. intracoronary streptokinase (n=-9) | patients within 12 hours of their first symptoms of acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | TRIANA, 2009 | Tenecteplase + UFH (+/- clopidogrel) (n=132) vs. Primary angioplasty (n=134) | >=75 years old with ST-segment elevation or LBBB AMI <6 hours of evolution without contraindications for thrombolytic therapy | open Parallel groups Sample size: 132/134 Primary endpoint: Death or Reinfarction or Disabling stroke FU duration: 30 days (12 months) |
|
myocardial revascularization | PTCA | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy rescue PTCA inferior to no rescue PTCA in terms of Minor bleeding in REACT (rescue PCI), 2005 rescue PTCA inferior to no rescue PTCA in terms of Minor bleeding in MERLIN, 2004 | 11 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005 | rescue PTCA vs no rescue PTCA | reinfarction 0.24 [0.07; 0.85] | Minor bleeding 4.04 [1.93; 8.44] | mortaliyy 0.49 [0.23; 1.05] Heart failure 0.62 [0.25; 1.56] stroke 2.94 [0.31; 27.91] | MERLIN, 2004 | rescue PTCA vs no rescue PTCA | | Minor bleeding 8.56 [2.01; 36.40] | mortaliyy 0.89 [0.46; 1.71] Heart failure 0.81 [0.56; 1.17] stroke 7.05 [0.88; 56.59] reinfarction 0.69 [0.33; 1.44] | RESCUE II, 2000 | rescue PTCA vs no rescue PTCA | | | mortaliyy ∞ [NaN; ∞] | RESCUE, 1994 | rescue PTCA vs no rescue PTCA | | | mortaliyy 0.53 [0.16; 1.75] Heart failure 0.19 [0.02; 1.56] | MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | | | stroke 1.00 [0.14; 6.91] death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.57 [0.25; 1.28] | PRAGUE-1, 2000 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.34 [0.16; 0.73] | | stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | AIR-PAMI, 2002 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | | | stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.62 [0.23; 1.65] | CAPTIM, 2002 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | | | stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.76 [0.47; 1.25] | DANAMI-2, 2003 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | reinfarction 0.31 [0.16; 0.61] death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.59 [0.42; 0.83] | | death 0.76 [0.51; 1.15] stroke 0.81 [0.34; 1.94] | PRAGUE-2, 2003 | primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis | stroke 0.11 [0.01; 0.86] death, reinfarctus, stroke 0.55 [0.38; 0.81] | | | Belenkie, 1992 | rescue PTCA vs no rescue PTCA | | | mortaliyy 0.19 [0.02; 1.47] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005 | rescue PCI (n=144) vs. conservative treatment (with unfractionated heparin for 24 hours) (n=141) 3 arms: thrombolysis versus rescue angioplasty versus conservative management without additional treatment | patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and failed reperfusion (less than 50 percent ST-segment resolution) within 90 minutes after thrombolytic treatment | open Parallel groups Sample size: 144/141 Primary endpoint: death, MI, CVA, HF FU duration: 6-month | MERLIN, 2004 | emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue PCI (n=153) vs. conservative treatment (n=154) | patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis | Parallel groups Sample size: 153/154 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | RESCUE II, 2000 | PCI (n=14) vs. conservative (n=15) | patient with TIMI II flow after fibrinolytic therapy for moderate to large MI | Parallel groups Sample size: 14/15 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | RESCUE, 1994 | balloon angioplasty supplemented by further thrombolytic therapy as needed (n=78) vs. conservative therapy (aspirin, heparin, and coronary vasodilators) (n=73) | patients with first anterior wall infarction and angiographically demonstrated occluded infarct vessel within 8 hours of chest pain onset after thrombolysis | Parallel groups Sample size: 78/73 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999 | Transfer for primary PTCA (n=75) vs. immediate thrombolysis with tPA (n=75) | patients with acute myocardial infarction initially admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities | open Sample size: 75/75 Primary endpoint: Test safety and feasibility of acute transfer for PCI FU duration: | PRAGUE-1, 2000 | immediate transportation for primary angioplasty without pre-treatment with thrombolysis (n=101) vs. immediate thrombolysis with streptokinase (n=99) | patients with acute myocardial infarction, presenting within 6 h of symptom onset at community hospitals without a catheterization laboratory | open Sample size: 101/99 Primary endpoint: Death, re-MI, or stroke (30 days) FU duration: 30 days | AIR-PAMI, 2002 | Transfer for Primary Angioplasty (n=71) vs. immediate thrombolysis (various thrombolytic) (n=66) | Patients with high-risk AMI (age >70 years, anterior MI, Killip class II/III, heart rate >100 beats/min or systolic BP <100 mm Hg), eligible for thrombolytic therapy | open Sample size: 71/66 Primary endpoint: Death, re-MI, or disabling stroke (30 days) FU duration: | CAPTIM, 2002 | Transfer for Primary Angioplasty (n=421) vs. prehospital fibrinolysis with accelerated alteplase (n=419) | patients within 6 h of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, initially managed by mobile emergency-care units | open Sample size: 421/419 Primary endpoint: Death, re-MI or stroke (30 days) FU duration: | DANAMI-2, 2003 | Transfer for Primary Angioplasty (n=567) vs. immediate thrombolysis with tPA (accelared infusion) (n=562) | patients with myocardial
infarction with ST-segment elevation | open Parallel groups Sample size: 567/562 Primary endpoint: Death, re-MI, or disabling stroke (30 days) FU duration: 30 days | PRAGUE-2, 2003 | immediate transport for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=429) vs. immediate thrombolysis with streptokinase (n=421) | patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction presenting within <12 h to the nearest community hospital without a catheter laboratory | open Sample size: 429/421 Primary endpoint: Mortality (30 days) FU duration: 30 days | Belenkie, 1992 | rescue PTCA (n=16) vs. conservative treatment (n=12) | patients with a persistently occluded infarct artery following thrombolytic therapy more than 3 h after symptom onset | open Parallel groups Sample size: 16/12 Primary endpoint: FU duration: hospital stay |
|
myocardial revascularization | PTCA | versus no systematic PCI No demonstrated result for efficacy systematic ballon angioplasty inferior to no systematic angioplasty in terms of all CABG in SWIFT, 1991 systematic ballon angioplasty inferior to no systematic angioplasty in terms of Emergency CABG in TIMI 2, 1989 | 21 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | In-hospital death 0.26 [0.09; 0.77] | | all CABG 0.99 [0.51; 1.91] Reocclusion 0.84 [0.39; 1.78] | ECSG, 1988 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | In-hospital death 2.41 [0.87; 6.71] Reinfarction 0.67 [0.28; 1.60] Recurrent ischemia 1.10 [0.63; 1.92] | SWIFT, 1991 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | all CABG 8.56 [3.96; 18.50] | In-hospital death 1.20 [0.54; 2.65] Long term mortality 1.17 [0.65; 2.09] Major bleeding 0.63 [0.21; 1.92] | SIAM, 1992 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | In-hospital death 1.47 [0.67; 3.21] | TIMI 2, 1989 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | Emergency CABG 2.37 [1.43; 3.92] | In-hospital death 1.11 [0.82; 1.50] Major bleeding 1.28 [0.94; 1.73] Reinfarction 1.11 [0.85; 1.45] all CABG 1.14 [0.94; 1.38] | Guerci, 1987 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | In-hospital death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Van den Brand, 1991 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | In-hospital death 0.31 [0.03; 2.90] Long term mortality 0.61 [0.10; 3.60] | TOPS, 1992 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | In-hospital death NaN [NaN; NaN] Reinfarction NaN [NaN; NaN] | | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | | TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | SHOCK (Hochman), 1999 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | Long term mortality 0.80 [0.65; 0.98] | | In-hospital death 0.83 [0.67; 1.04] | Ellis, 1994 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | Vermeer, 1999 | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | | Erbel, 1989 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | SWISS-SMASH, 1999 | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | In-hospital death 0.88 [0.64; 1.21] Long term mortality 0.87 [0.65; 1.16] stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Reinfarction 0.72 [0.05; 10.91] all CABG ∞ [NaN; ∞] | | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | | immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty | | | | | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | | | systematic ballon angioplasty vs no systematic angioplasty | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987 | Angioplasty within 120 min (after rtPA) (n=99) vs. defered CA (7-10 days) and angioplasty if indicated (n=98) | patients with acute myocardial infarction. | open parallel group Sample size: 99/98 Primary endpoint: LV function FU duration: in hospital | ECSG, 1988 | angioplasty as soon as possible (after rtPA) (n=183) vs. non-invasive strategy without immediate CA and PTCA (n=184)
| patients with acute myocardial infarction within 5 h after onset of symptoms
| open parallel group Sample size: 183/184 Primary endpoint: no primary endpoint specified FU duration: 1 y
| SWIFT, 1991 | CA 72h with a view to PTCA or CABG (n=397) vs. elective angioplasty (only if required by clinical indication) (n=403) | patients presenting with clinical and electrocardiographic features of acute myocardial infarction up to three hours after the onset of major symptoms | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 397/403 Primary endpoint: death or reinfraction FU duration: 1 y | SIAM, 1992 | CA with CABG/PTCA 14-48 hours (n=158) vs. no CA within the first 21days unless evidence of ischemia (n=166) | patients treated by thrombolysis for AMI | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 158/166 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: <3 years | TIMI 2, 1989 | CA 18 to 48 hrs (n=1636) vs. no CA unless spontaneous or exercise induced ischemia (n=1626) | patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) within four hours of the onset of chest pain thought to be caused by myocardial infarction | Open Factorial plan Sample size: 1636/1626 Primary endpoint: death + reinfarction at 42 days FU duration: 6 we | Guerci, 1987 | PTCA at 4 day
(n=42) vs. no PTCA during the 10 days study period
(n=43) | patients candidate to PTCA determined at the 1st day CA | Factorial plan Sample size: 42/43 Primary endpoint: ventricular function FU duration: 10 days | Van den Brand, 1991 | CA at 2-5 days, PTCA if suitable lesion
(n=113) vs. CA at 2-5 days but no PTCA
(n=104) | suitable lesion | NA Parallel groups Sample size: 113/104 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 3 mo | TOPS, 1992 | PTCA to be performed 4-14 days after MI (n=42) vs. conservative management, no PTCA (n=45) | patients with residual stenoses after thrombolytic treatment of myocardial infarction | Parallel groups Sample size: 42/45 Primary endpoint: ventricular function FU duration: 12 months | TIMI II-A (defered) | delayed invasive strategy, deferred angiography and PTCA for 18-48 hours (n=194) vs. conservative approach (n=197) | | Sample size: 194/197 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991 | immediate catheterization with angioplasty for failed thrombolysis (90min after rtPA/urokinase) (n=287) vs. deferred predischarge catheterization on days 5-10, no PTCA planned (n=288) 3 x 2 factorial design (2nd factor: t-PA vs urokinase vs both) | patient with acute myocardial infarction | Factorial plan Sample size: 287/288 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | SHOCK (Hochman), 1999 | emergency revascularization (n=152) vs. initial medical stabilization (n=150) | patients
with cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 152/150 Primary endpoint: mortality from all causes FU duration: 30 days (6y) | Ellis, 1994 | balloon angioplasty supplemented by further thrombolytic therapy as needed (n=78) vs. conservative therapy (n=73) | patients with first anterior wall infarction treated with any accepted intravenous thrombolytic regimen and angiographically demonstrated to have an occluded infarct vessel within 8 hours of chest pain onset | Sample size: 78/73 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Vermeer, 1999 | alteplase followed by transfer to the PTCA centre and (if indicated) rescue PTCA (n=-9) vs. thrombolytic treatment with alteplase (n=-9) 3rd arms: transfer for primary PTCA | patients with acute myocardial infarction initially admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities | Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 42 days | Erbel, 1989 | combined intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase with immediate coronary angioplasty (n=103) vs. combined intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase without immediate coronary angioplasty (n=103) | patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction | Parallel groups Sample size: 103/103 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 years | MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 | emergency coronary angiography with rescue PCI (n=-9) vs. conservative treatment (n=-9) | patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis | Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days | SWISS-SMASH, 1999 | emergency angiography, followed immediately by revascularization when indicated (n=32) vs. initial medical management (n=23) | Patients with acute myocardial infarction and early shock | open Parallel groups Sample size: 32/23 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: 30 days (1y) | TIMI 2A, 1988 | CA within 120 min of the start of the rtPA infusion. PTCA whether the artery is open or closed (n=195) vs. CA within 18-48hrs. PTCA only if artery open (TIMI 2 or 3) (n=194) | patient thrombolyzed for a AMI | open parallel group Sample size: 195/194 Primary endpoint: LV function FU duration: 21 days | Belenkie, 1991 | immediate PTCA (n=50) vs. delayed PTCA (18-38h) (n=39) | patients with a patent infarct-related artery after thrombolytic therapy suitable for angioplasty | open parallel group Sample size: 50/39 Primary endpoint: infarct region wall motion FU duration: 4 months | Topol, 1987 | immediate PTCA (n=15) vs. no PTCA (n=13) | patients with evolving transmural myocardial infarction | open parallel group Sample size: 15/13 Primary endpoint: myocardial function FU duration: in hospital | TAMI 6, 1992 | PTCA 6-24h after rtPA (n=34) vs. no PTCA planned (n=37) | | Sample size: 34/37 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Barbash, 1990 | PTCA>72h after rtPA if stenosis>70% (n=97) vs. PTCA>72h after rtPA if stenosis>50% and ischemia (n=104) | | Sample size: 97/104 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
myocardial revascularization | reteplase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
GUSTO III, 1997 | reteplase vs accelerated t-PA | | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.79 [0.57; 1.09] Mortalité précoce 1.03 [0.91; 1.17] AVC précoce 0.92 [0.71; 1.18] | INJECT, 1995 | reteplase vs streptokinase | | | Mortalité précoce 0.95 [0.81; 1.11] AVC précoce 1.23 [0.76; 1.99] | RAPID-2, 1996 | reteplase vs accelerated t-PA | total patency (TIMI 2 or 3) 1.14 [1.01; 1.28] complete patency (TIMI 3) 1.32 [1.06; 1.65] | | total stroke 0.69 [0.16; 3.02] Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.28 [0.69; 2.40] Haemorraghic stroke 0.61 [0.10; 3.61] Mortalité précoce 0.49 [0.20; 1.21] AVC précoce 0.69 [0.16; 3.02] reinfarction 1.05 [0.39; 2.82] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
GUSTO III, 1997 | reteplase, in two bolus doses or 10 MU each given 30 minutes apart (n=10138) vs. alteplase, up to 100 mg infused over a period of 90 minutes (n=4921) | patients within 6 hours after the onset of symptoms with ST-segment elevation or bundle-branch block | open Parallel groups Sample size: 10138/4921 Primary endpoint: Mortality 30-day FU duration: 30 days | INJECT, 1995 | Reteplase 2 bolus de 10 MU Ã 30 min d'intervalle (n=3004) vs. Streptokinase 1.5 MU en IV en 60 min (n=3006) | patients with symptoms and electrocardiographic criteria consistent with acute myocardial infarction within 12 h from onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3004/3006 Primary endpoint: Mortality 35-day FU duration: 6 mo | RAPID-2, 1996 | 10 plus 10 megaunits double bolus of reteplase (n=169) vs. front-loaded alteplase (n=155) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 12h from onset of ischemic chest pain | open Parallel groups Sample size: 169/155 Primary endpoint: Patency at 90 min FU duration: 35 days |
|
myocardial revascularization | saruplase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
COMPASS, 1998 | saruplase vs streptokinase | | | Mortalité à long terme 0.86 [0.69; 1.08] Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.84 [0.53; 1.34] Mortalité précoce 0.85 [0.64; 1.12] AVC précoce 1.00 [0.56; 1.80] | PRIMI (vs SK), 1989 | saruplase vs streptokinase | | | | SESAM, 1997 | saruplase vs t-PA | | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.10 [0.62; 1.97] Haemorraghic stroke 1.00 [0.14; 7.07] Mortalité précoce 1.23 [0.52; 2.91] AVC précoce 0.80 [0.22; 2.95] reinfarction 1.00 [0.43; 2.37] | PRIMI (vs UK), 1989 | saruplase vs urokinase | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
COMPASS, 1998 | saruplase 20-mg bolus and 60-mg infusion over 60 min (n=1542) vs. streptokinase 1.5-MU infusion over 60 min (n=1547) | patients with symptoms compatible with those of acute myocardial infarction for < 6 h | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1542/1547 Primary endpoint: death 30d FU duration: 1 y | PRIMI (vs SK), 1989 | sarupalse 20 mg bolus followed by 60 mg infusion for 60 min (n=198) vs. 1.5 million IU streptokinase infused over 60 min (n=203) | patients with acute myocardial infarction were within 4 h of onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 198/203 Primary endpoint: patency FU duration: ND | SESAM, 1997 | saruplase 80 mg/hour (n=236) vs. alteplase 100 mg every 3 hours (n=237) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 236/237 Primary endpoint: patency FU duration: hospital stay | PRIMI (vs UK), 1989 | 20 mg bolus followed by 60 mg infusion for 60 min (n=198) vs. 80 mg recombinant pro-urokinase (n=-9) | with a first acute myocardial infarction within 4 h of onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 198/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
myocardial revascularization | streptokinase | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy streptokinase inferior to placebo in terms of Hémorragies majeures précoces in ISAM, 1986 streptokinase inferior to placebo in terms of Hémorragies majeures précoces in ISIS-2 (SK), 1988 streptokinase inferior to placebo in terms of Hémorragies majeures précoces in Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988 | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISAM, 1986 | streptokinase vs placebo | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 4.03 [2.21; 7.35] | Mortalité à long terme 0.98 [0.75; 1.29] Mortalité précoce 0.88 [0.62; 1.25] | ISIS-2 (SK), 1988 | streptokinase vs placebo | Mortalité précoce 0.77 [0.70; 0.84] | Hémorragies majeures précoces 2.56 [1.48; 4.40] | AVC précoce 0.91 [0.64; 1.29] | Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988 | streptokinase vs placebo | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 23.17 [3.17; 169.20] | Mortalité précoce 0.65 [0.32; 1.33] | GISSI I, 1986 | streptokinase vs placebo | Mortalité à long terme 0.90 [0.83; 0.97] Mortalité précoce 0.83 [0.75; 0.91] | | | EMERAS (all delay), 1993 | streptokinase vs placebo | | | Mortalité précoce 0.96 [0.82; 1.13] | ISIS 2 pilot, 1987 | streptokinase vs placebo | | | | EMERAS (7-12h), 1993 | streptokinase vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISAM, 1986 | 1.5 million IU of streptokinase over 1h (n=859) vs. Placebo (n=882) | patients within six hours after the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 859/882 Primary endpoint: Mortality 21-day FU duration: 21 days | ISIS-2 (SK), 1988 | 1-hour intravenous infusion of 1.5 MU of streptokinase (n=8592) vs. Placebo (n=8595) | patients within 24h of the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind plan factoriel 2*2 Sample size: 8592/8595 Primary endpoint: CV Mortality 35-day FU duration: 15 mo | Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988 | Streptokinase en IV, 1.5 M UI en 60 min après injection de benadryl 50 mg en IV et hydrocortisone 100 mg en IV; héparine en IV 1000 UI/h 2h après la streptokinase puis warfarine pendant au moins 3 mois (n=191) vs. Traitement standard, avec ou sans anticoagulant (décidé par le médecin) (n=177) | Hommes et femmes, < ou = 75 ans | Parallel groups Sample size: 191/177 Primary endpoint: death at 14 d FU duration: 1.4 y | GISSI I, 1986 | Streptokinase 1.5 MU en perfusion IV en 1 heure (n=5860) vs. usual care (n=5852) | patients within 12 h after the onset of symptoms and with no contraindications to SK | open Parallel groups Sample size: 5860/5852 Primary endpoint: in hospital death FU duration: 1 y | EMERAS (all delay), 1993 | streptokinase 1.5 MU (n=2257) vs. placebo (n=2277) | patients entering hospital up to 24 h after the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2257/2277 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | ISIS 2 pilot, 1987 | streptokinase 1.5 MU (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) 2nd factor heparin vs placebo | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | EMERAS (7-12h), 1993 | intravenous streptokinase 1.5 MU (n=2257) vs. placebo (n=2277) | patients presenting 7-12 h from symptom onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2257/2277 Primary endpoint: in hospital death FU duration: |
|
myocardial revascularization | streptokinase | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy streptokinase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term major bleeding in patients treated in SAMI (O’Neill), 1992 streptokinase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation in SAMI (O’Neill), 1992 streptokinase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in PRAGUE (Widimisky), 2000 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SAMI (O’Neill), 1992 | streptokinase vs primary intervention | | Short-term major bleeding in patients treated 8.15 [1.95; 34.10] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 8.69 [1.12; 67.37] | Short-term death NaN [NaN; NaN] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction NaN [NaN; NaN] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.07 [0.98; 1.17] Initial TIMI 3 flow 0.78 [0.39; 1.56] | PRAGUE (Widimisky), 2000 | streptokinase vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 2.53 [1.37; 4.65] | Short-term death 1.73 [0.71; 4.22] Short-term major bleeding in patients treated ∞ [NaN; ∞] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 7.07 [0.89; 56.42] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.99 [0.91; 1.07] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SAMI (O’Neill), 1992 | facilated PCI with streptokinase 1·5 million units(intravenous) (n=59) vs. primary intervention (n=63) | symptom duration <4h | Sample size: 59/63 Primary endpoint: FU duration: In hospital | PRAGUE (Widimisky), 2000 | facilated PCI with Streptokinase 1·5 million units (intravenous) (n=100) vs. primary intervention (n=101) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 100/101 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day |
|
myocardial revascularization | streptokinase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
GUSTO tPA-SK Hiv, 1993 | t-PA + streptokinase vs streptokinase | | | Mortalité précoce 0.96 [0.88; 1.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
GUSTO tPA-SK Hiv, 1993 | tPA en IV 1 mg/kg, sans dépasser 90 mg, dont 10 % en bolus + streptokinase 1 MU en 60 min + héparine en IV (5000 U en bolus, 1000 U/h (de préférence 1200 U/h si > 80 kg), poursuivi au moins 48 h) (n=10374) vs. Streptokinase 1.5 MU en 60 min + héparine SC (12500 U 2 fois/j commencée 4h après thrombolytique) combiné à streptokinase (1.5 MU en 60 min) + héparine en IV (5000 U en bolus, puis 1000 U/h (1200 U/h si > 80 kg) poursuivi au moins 48 h) (n=20251) | Hommes et femmes | Parallel groups Sample size: 10374/20251 Primary endpoint: Mortality 30-day FU duration: 30 d |
|
myocardial revascularization | t-pa | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy t-PA inferior to placebo in terms of Hémorragies majeures précoces in ASSET, 1988 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSET, 1988 | t-PA vs placebo | Mortalité à long terme 0.79 [0.68; 0.92] Mortalité précoce 0.74 [0.62; 0.89] | Hémorragies majeures précoces 2.89 [1.50; 5.56] | AVC précoce 1.11 [0.65; 1.90] | LATE, 1993 | t-PA vs placebo | | | Mortalité précoce 0.91 [0.80; 1.03] | TAMI 6, 1992 | t-PA vs placebo | | | Mortalité à long terme 1.26 [0.57; 2.79] Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.79 [0.18; 3.43] Mortalité précoce 1.05 [0.44; 2.54] reinfarction 0.63 [0.16; 2.57] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSET, 1988 | rt-PA 100 mg (n=2516) vs. Placebo (n=2495) | patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2516/2495 Primary endpoint: death at 6 mo FU duration: 6 months | LATE, 1993 | intravenous alteplase (100 mg over 3 h) (n=2836) vs. placebo (n=2875) | patients with symptoms and electrocardiographic criteria consistent with AMI between 6 and 24 h from symptom onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2836/2875 Primary endpoint: 35-day mortality FU duration: 6 mo | TAMI 6, 1992 | tissue-type plasminogen activator 100 mg over 2 hours (n=96) vs. placebo (n=101) | patients with 6 to 24 hours of symptoms and ECG ST elevation | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 96/101 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months |
|
myocardial revascularization | t-pa | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy t-PA inferior to streptokinase in terms of total stroke in GISSI II, 1990 t-PA inferior to streptokinase in terms of AVC précoce in International Study Group, 1990 | 16 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
GUSTO tPA Hiv, 1993 | accelerated t-PA vs streptokinase | Mortalité précoce 0.86 [0.79; 0.94] | | | GISSI II, 1990 | t-PA vs streptokinase | Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.56 [0.37; 0.85] | total stroke 1.41 [1.09; 1.82] | Mortalité précoce 1.04 [0.93; 1.16] AVC précoce 1.30 [0.91; 1.85] | International Study Group, 1990 | t-PA vs streptokinase | Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.67 [0.49; 0.92] | AVC précoce 1.41 [1.09; 1.83] | Mortalité à long terme 1.05 [0.98; 1.13] Mortalité précoce 1.05 [0.96; 1.15] | COBALT, 1997 | bolus t-PA vs accelerated t-PA | | | Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.09 [0.61; 1.94] Mortalité précoce 1.06 [0.90; 1.24] AVC précoce 1.25 [0.88; 1.78] | ISIS III (SK/tPA), 1992 | t-PA vs streptokinase | AVC précoce 0.75 [0.60; 0.93] | | Mortalité à long terme 0.99 [0.94; 1.05] Hémorragies majeures précoces 1.08 [0.83; 1.40] Mortalité précoce 1.02 [0.96; 1.10] | Centre Illinois, 1993 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | | Cherng, 1992 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | reinfarction 0.46 [0.12; 1.69] | ECSG, 1985 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | total stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | PAIMS, 1989 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | | TIMI-1, 1987 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | | White, 1989 | t-PA vs streptokinase | | | | KAMIT, 1991 | t-PA half dose vs t-PA | | | reinfarction 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | TAMI 5 (t-PA vs uroK), 1991 | t-PA vs urokinase | | | | TAPS, 1992 | accelerated t-PA vs APSAC | | | Mortalité précoce 0.29 [0.08; 1.15] | RAAMI, 1992 | accelerated t-PA vs t-PA | | | | TIMI 4, 1994 | accelerated t-PA vs APSAC | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
GUSTO tPA Hiv, 1993 | tPA accéléré (15 mg en bolus, puis 0.75 mg/kg en 30 min sans dépasser 50 mg puis 0.5 mg/kg en 60 min sans dépasser 35 mg) + héparine en IV (5000 U en bolus, 1000 U/h (de préférence 1200 U/h si > 80 kg), poursuivi au moins 48 h) (n=10396) vs. Streptokinase 1.5 MU en 60 min + héparine SC (12500 U 2 fois/j commencée 4h après thrombolytique) combiné à streptokinase (1.5 MU en 60 min) + héparine en IV (5000 U en bolus, puis 1000 U/h (1200 U/h si > 80 kg) poursuivi au moins 48 h) (n=20251) | Hommes et femmes | Parallel groups Sample size: 10396/20251 Primary endpoint: Mortality 30-day FU duration: 30 d | GISSI II, 1990 | alteplase 100 mg infused intravenously over 3 h (n=6182) vs. streptokinase 1.5 MU infused intravenously over 30-60 min (n=6199) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 6 h from onset of symptoms | open Plan factoriel 2*2 Sample size: 6182/6199 Primary endpoint: Mortality in-hospital FU duration: 6 mo | International Study Group, 1990 | tPA 100 mg en IV en 3 h (10 mg en bolus, puis 50 mg en 1 h, puis 20 mg/h pendant 2 h) (n=10372) vs. Streptokinase 1.5 MU en IV de 30 à 60 min (n=10396) | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration | double blind Plan factoriel 2*2 Sample size: 10372/10396 Primary endpoint: in hospital death FU duration: 6 mo | COBALT, 1997 | of 50 mg of alteplase over a period of 1 to 3 minutes followed 30 minutes later by a second bolus of 50 mg (or 40 mg for patients who weighed less than 60 kg). (n=3585) vs. weight-adjusted, accelerated infusion of 100 mg of alteplase (n=3584) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3585/3584 Primary endpoint: death 30d FU duration: 30 days | ISIS III (SK/tPA), 1992 | Streptokinase 1.5 MU en IV d'une heure (n=13780) vs. tPA 0.04 MU/kg en IV en bolus d'1 min, puis 0.36 MU/kg en 1 h, puis 0.067 MU/kg/h pendant 3 h (n=13746) | Hommes et femmes | double blind Plan factoriel 3 (ou 4) *2 Sample size: 13780/13746 Primary endpoint: Mortality 35-day FU duration: 6 mo | Centre Illinois, 1993 | t-PA 10 mg bolus, followed by 50 mg in the first hour, and 20 mg/hour for the next 2 hours (n=123) vs. SK 375 000 IU bolus, followed by 1 125 000 IU/1 hage/pj (n=130) | patients with AMI within 3h from onset of chest pain | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 123/130 Primary endpoint: Not stated FU duration: | Cherng, 1992 | 100 mg of rTPA over 3 hours (with early heparinization) (n=59) vs. 1,500,000 units of streptokinase over 1 hour (n=63) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 59/63 Primary endpoint: none defined FU duration: hospital stay | ECSG, 1985 | 0.75 mg rt-PA/kg over 90 min (n=64) vs. 1 500 000 IU streptokinase over 60 min (n=65) | patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration | single-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 64/65 Primary endpoint: Not stated FU duration: | PAIMS, 1989 | intravenous cumulative dose of 100 mg rt-PA (n=86) vs. .5 million units streptokinase (n=85) | patients with acute myocardial infarction less than 3 h old | open Parallel groups Sample size: 86/85 Primary endpoint: Thrombolytic efficacy and effects on LVF FU duration: | TIMI-1, 1987 | rt-PA, 40, 20, and 20 mg in successive hours (n=157) vs. SK 1.5 million units over 1 hr (n=159) | patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction within 7 hr of the onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 157/159 Primary endpoint: Patency at 90 min FU duration: | White, 1989 | rt-PA 100 mg over three hours (n=135) vs. streptokinase 1.5 million units over 30 minutes (n=135) | patients with AMI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 135/135 Primary endpoint: LVF FU duration: | KAMIT, 1991 | half-dose (50 mg) t-PA with streptokinase (1.5 MU) during 1 hour (n=109) vs. t-PA (100 mg) during 3 hours (n=107) | patients within 6 hours of myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 109/107 Primary endpoint: Patency at 90 min FU duration: hospital stay | TAMI 5 (t-PA vs uroK), 1991 | accelerated t-PA 100mg over 3h (n=191) vs. urokinase IV bolus 1.5 MU followed by 1.5 MU over 90min (n=190) | patient with acute myocardial infarction | open Sample size: 191/190 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | TAPS, 1992 | front-loaded administration of rt-PA (n=199) vs. APSAC (n=202) | patients with acute myocardial infarction. | open Parallel groups Sample size: 199/202 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | RAAMI, 1992 | 100 mg of rt-PA accelerated 90-min regimen (15-mg bolus followed by 50 mg over 30 min, then 35 mg over 60 min) (n=143) vs. 100 mg of rt-PA standard 3-h infusion regimen (an initial 10-mg bolus followed by 50 mg for the 1st h, then 20 mg/h for 2 h (n=138) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 6h from onset of chest pain | open Parallel groups Sample size: 143/138 Primary endpoint: patency 90 min FU duration: hospital stay | TIMI 4, 1994 | front-loaded rt-PA (n=-9) vs. APSAC (n=-9) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: unsatisfactory outcome FU duration: hospital stay |
|
myocardial revascularization | tenecteplase | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term death in ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term non-fatal reinfarction in ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 inferior to primary intervention in terms of Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation in ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 tenecteplase inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in GRACIA (Fernandez-Aviles,), 2004 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 | vs primary intervention | | Short-term death 1.58 [1.02; 2.43] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 1.82 [1.12; 2.97] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 4.56 [2.13; 9.75] Initial TIMI 3 flow 2.90 [2.42; 3.46] | Short-term major bleeding in patients treated 1.26 [0.82; 1.92] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.99 [0.95; 1.02] | GRACIA (Fernandez-Aviles,), 2004 | tenecteplase vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 4.90 [2.90; 8.28] | Short-term death 0.62 [0.15; 2.54] Short-term major bleeding in patients treated 0.35 [0.04; 3.27] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 1.04 [0.07; 16.39] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 1.04 [0.07; 16.39] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.04 [0.92; 1.16] | | Eptifibatide + tenecteplase vs primary intervention | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006 | facilated PCI with tenecplase bodyweight-adjusted intravenous bolus: 30 mg of drug if bodyweight <60 kg, 35 mg if60–69 kg, 40 mg if 70–79 kg, 45 mg if 80–89 kg, and 50 mg if >=90 kg (n=829) vs. primary intervention (n=838) | symptom duration <6 h | Sample size: 829/838 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | GRACIA (Fernandez-Aviles,), 2004 | facilated PCI with bodyweight-adjusted intravenous tenecteplase bolus: 30 mg of drug if bodyweight <60 kg, 35 mg if60–69 kg, 40 mg if 70–79 kg, 45 mg if 80–89 kg, and 50 mg if >=90 kg and Abciximab; 0·25 mg/kg intravenousbolus, 0·125 g/kg per min infusi (n=104) vs. primary intervention (n=108) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 104/108 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | ADVANCE-MI, 2005 | facilated PCI with Eptifibatide, 180 µg/kg intravenous double bolus, 2·0 µg/kg per min infusion and tenecteplase 0·25 mg/kg (intravenous bolus) (n=69) vs. (n=77) | symptom duration <4h | Sample size: 69/77 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days |
|
myocardial revascularization | tenecteplase | versus other fibrinolytic No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT-2, 1999 | tenecteplase vs accelerated t-PA | Hémorragies majeures précoces 0.78 [0.69; 0.89] | | Mortalité précoce 1.01 [0.89; 1.13] AVC précoce 1.07 [0.86; 1.35] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT-2, 1999 | Tenecteplase en IV bolus (dose en fonction du poids: 30 mg si < 60 kg; 35 mg si poids entre 60 et 69.9 kg; 40 mg pour les 80-89.9 kg; 50 mg si > ou = 90 kg (n=8461) vs. Alteplase en IV, bolus de 15 mg, puis 0.75 mg/kg (sans dépasser 50 mg) en 30 min puis 0.50 mg/kg (sans dépasser 35 mg) en 60 min (n=8488) | patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 8461/8488 Primary endpoint: Mortality 30-day FU duration: 30d |
|
myocardial revascularization | tirofiban | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy Tirofiban inferior to primary intervention in terms of Initial TIMI 3 flow in TIGER-PA (Lee), 2003 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
On-Time (van’t Hof), 2004 | Tirofiban vs primary intervention | | | Short-term death 4.54 [0.99; 20.78] Short-term major bleeding 1.39 [0.57; 3.39] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 1.51 [0.25; 8.97] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation ∞ [NaN; ∞] Final TIMI 3 flow 0.99 [0.93; 1.05] Initial TIMI 3 flow 1.28 [0.86; 1.91] | TIGER-PA (Lee), 2003 | Tirofiban vs primary intervention | | Initial TIMI 3 flow 3.20 [1.27; 8.07] | Short-term death 1.00 [0.06; 15.55] Short-term major bleeding 1.00 [0.06; 15.55] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.00 [0.89; 1.12] | Cutlip, 2003 | Tirofiban vs primary intervention | | | Short-term death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Short-term major bleeding 1.07 [0.16; 7.10] Short-term non-fatal reinfarction 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Short-term urgent target vessel revascularisation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Final TIMI 3 flow 1.08 [0.97; 1.20] Initial TIMI 3 flow 1.61 [0.66; 3.94] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
On-Time (van’t Hof), 2004 | facilated PCI with Tirofiban; 10 µg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·15 µg/kg per min infusion (n=245) vs. primary intervention (n=247) | symptom duration <6h | Sample size: 245/247 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | TIGER-PA (Lee), 2003 | facilated PCI with Tirofiban; 10 µg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·15 µg/kg per min infusion (n=50) vs. primary intervention (n=50) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day | Cutlip, 2003 | facilated PCI with Tirofiban; 10 µg/kg intravenous bolus, 0·15 µg/kg per min infusion (n=28) vs. primary intervention (n=30) | symptom duration <12h | Sample size: 28/30 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30-day |
|
myocardial revascularization | urokinase | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
USIM, 1991 | urokinase vs control | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
USIM, 1991 | urokinase bolus dose of 1 million U repeated after 60 minutes plus heparin (n=1128) vs. control (heparin alone) (n=1073) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 4 hours of the onset of pain | open Parallel groups Sample size: 1128/1073 Primary endpoint: FU duration: in hospital |
|
nitrates | isosorbide dinitrate | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS-4, 1995 | isosorbide mononitrate vs placebo | deaths at 2 days 0.82 [0.73; 0.92] early death 0.91 [0.85; 0.98] | | | Hildebrandt, 1992 | isosorbide dinitrate vs placebo | | | deaths at 2 days 0.00 [0.00; NaN] early death 0.33 [0.07; 1.57] | Hargreaves, 1992 | isosorbide mononitrate vs placebo | | | early death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Fitzgerald, 1990 | isosorbide mononitrate vs placebo | | | early death 1.23 [0.47; 3.23] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS-4, 1995 | oral controlled-release mononitrate 30 mg initial dose titrated up to 60 mg once daily for 1 month (n=29018) vs. placebo (n=29032) | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction up to 24h | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 29018/29032 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5 weeks | Hildebrandt, 1992 | titrated isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) for 48h (n=50) vs. placebo (n=50) | patients with strong clinical and electrocardiographic suspicion of myocardial infarction within 8 hours after the onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 50/50 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | Hargreaves, 1992 | 20 mg of isosorbide mononitrate three times daily for 28 days (n=33) vs. placebo (n=18) | patients with acute myocardial infarction (systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg) within 24 hours of the start of pain | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 33/18 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 28 days | Fitzgerald, 1990 | oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate (ISMN) for 5 days (n=184) vs. placebo (n=176) | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 184/176 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 6 mo |
|
nitrates | molsidomine | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ESPRIM, 1994 | molsidomine vs placebo | | | deaths at 2 days 0.76 [0.52; 1.12] early death 1.03 [0.81; 1.31] | Beaufils, 1988 | molsidomine vs placebo | | | early death 0.56 [0.21; 1.48] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ESPRIM, 1994 | linsidomine 1 mg/h intravenously for 48 h, followed by 16 mg molsidomine by mouth daily for 12 days (n=2007) vs. placebo (n=2010) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 h of symptom onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2007/2010 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 13 mo | Beaufils, 1988 | molsidomine for 10 days (n=133) vs. placebo (n=137) | patients with a first myocardial infarction within 6 hours from onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 133/137 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 10 days |
|
nitrates | nitroglycerin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 10 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Chiche, 1979 | nitroglycerin vs control | | | death 0.34 [0.10; 1.19] | Bussman, 1981 | nitroglycerin vs control | death 0.31 [0.11; 0.86] | | early death 0.37 [0.08; 1.78] | Flaherty, 1983 | nitroglycerin vs placebo | | | death 0.86 [0.41; 1.80] early death 0.49 [0.15; 1.57] | Nelson, 1983 | nitroglycerin vs control | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] early death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Jaffe, 1983 | nitroglycerin vs placebo | | | death 2.00 [0.38; 10.49] early death 0.48 [0.15; 1.55] | Lis, 1984 | nitroglycerin vs placebo | | | death 0.59 [0.21; 1.65] early death 0.59 [0.15; 2.28] | Jugdutt, 1983 | nitroglycerin vs control | death 0.55 [0.35; 0.86] | | early death 0.50 [0.05; 4.75] | GISSI-3, 1994 | nitroglycerin vs control | deaths at 2 days 0.82 [0.68; 0.99] | | early death 0.93 [0.82; 1.05] | Charvat, 1990 | nitroglycerin vs placebo | | | early death 1.08 [0.33; 3.55] | Jugdutt, 1988 | nitroglycerin vs control | early death 0.24 [0.11; 0.54] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Chiche, 1979 | Nitroglycerin IV for 7 days (n=50) vs. placebo (n=45) | patients with suspected myocardial infarction, within 12 h of the onset | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 50/45 Primary endpoint: FU duration: in hospital (28d) | Bussman, 1981 | i.v. nitroglycerin for 48 hours (n=31) vs. no i.v. nitroglycerin (n=29) | patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours | open Parallel groups Sample size: 31/29 Primary endpoint: infarct size FU duration: 18 months | Flaherty, 1983 | Nitroglycerin for 48h (n=56) vs. placebo (n=48) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 56/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 15 months | Nelson, 1983 | intravenous isosorbide dinitrate (50-200 micrograms/kg/h) (n=14) vs. frusemide (1 mg/kg) (n=14) | men with radiographic and haemodynamic evidence of left ventricular failure following acute myocardial infarction | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 14/14 Primary endpoint: FU duration: in hospital | Jaffe, 1983 | glyceryl trinitrate titrated (n=57) vs. placebo (n=57) | patients with inferior infarction under conventional clinical conditions within 10 hours of the onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 57/57 Primary endpoint: FU duration: in hospital | Lis, 1984 | 48-h intravenous infusion of nitroglycer (n=64) vs. placebo (n=76) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 64/76 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 4 months | Jugdutt, 1983 | Intravenous nitroglycerin (n=154) vs. control (n=156) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 154/156 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months | GISSI-3, 1994 | nitrates intravenous for the first 24 h followed by transdermal transdermal glyceryl trinitrate nitrates 10 mg daily (n=9663) vs. control (n=9655) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 9663/9655 Primary endpoint: Italy FU duration: 6 week | Charvat, 1990 | intravenous nitroglycerin for 48h (n=62) vs. placebo (n=67) | patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST segment elevation on admission but no Q wave in the infarcted area within 6 hours of onset | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 62/67 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 72 hours | Jugdutt, 1988 | intravenous nitroglycerin (n=154) vs. control (n=156) remarque traitement | acute myocardial infarction remarque patient | open Parallel groups Sample size: 154/156 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 mo remarque traitement |
|
thrombectomy | divers | versus conventional PCI No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
De Luca, 2006 | Diver vs conventional PCI | Myocardial Blush Grade <3 0.73 [0.55; 0.96] | | MACE 0.75 [0.18; 3.13] TIMI<3 flow 0.67 [0.31; 1.44] | REMEDIA, 2005 | Diver vs conventional PCI | Myocardial Blush Grade <3 0.75 [0.57; 0.99] ST-segment resolution failure 0.66 [0.45; 0.98] | | revascularization 0.98 [0.06; 15.61] stroke 0.98 [0.06; 15.61] MACE 0.98 [0.30; 3.19] angiographically distal embolization 0.50 [0.16; 1.55] TIMI<3 flow 0.59 [0.28; 1.22] death or MI 1.00 [0.31; 3.23] | PIHRATE, 2004 | Diver vs conventional PCI | | | revascularization 1.84 [0.17; 19.96] | Sardella, 2005 | Diver vs conventional PCI | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
De Luca, 2006 | Diver (n=38) vs. conventional stenting (n=38) | patients with anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction | open Sample size: 38/38 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | REMEDIA, 2005 | Diver (n=50) vs. standard PCI (n=49) | patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction | open Sample size: 50/49 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 month | PIHRATE, 2004 | Diver (n=102) vs. conventional PCI (n=94) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | Sample size: 102/94 Primary endpoint: FU duration: hospital stay | Sardella, 2005 | Diver (n=28) vs. conventional PCI (n=34) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | Sample size: 28/34 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months |
|