pathology | treatment | patient | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
diabetes type 2 | aleglitazar | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ALEPREVENT | aleglitazar vs placebo | | | | ALECARDIO, 2014 | aleglitazar vs placebo | | | all causes death 1.08 [0.85; 1.37] CVdeath 1.15 [0.88; 1.51] CV events 0.96 [0.83; 1.11] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ALEPREVENT | aleglitazar 150 ìg (n=1999) vs. placebo (n=0) | patients with T2D or prediabetes with established, stable CV disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1999/0 Primary endpoint: Cv events FU duration: 58 days | ALECARDIO, 2014 | aleglitazar 150 ìg daily (n=3616) vs. placebo (n=3610) | patients hospitalized for ACS (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3616/3610 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular FU duration: 2 years ( median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | alogliptin | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
EXAMINE, 2013 | alogliptin vs placebo | | | all causes death 0.88 [0.71; 1.09] CVdeath 0.85 [0.66; 1.10] CV events 0.96 [0.83; 1.11] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
EXAMINE, 2013 | alogliptin (n=2701) vs. placebo (n=2679) | patients with type 2 diabetes and either an acute myocardial
infarction or unstable angina requiring hospitalization within the previous 15
to 90 days | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2701/2679 Primary endpoint: death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial FU duration: 1.5 years (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | canagliflozin | not classified | versus placebo canagliflozin superior to placebo in terms of CV events in CANVAS, 2017 canagliflozin inferior to placebo in terms of amputation in CANVAS, 2017 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CANVAS, 2017 | canagliflozin vs placebo | CV events 0.86 [0.76; 0.98] Demonstrated Hospitalization for heart failure 0.67 [0.52; 0.87] Nephropathy 0.60 [0.47; 0.77] | amputation 1.97 [1.41; 2.75] | all causes death 0.87 [0.74; 1.02] CVdeath 0.87 [0.72; 1.06] fatal and non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.69; 1.09] fatal and non fatal MI 0.89 [0.73; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CANVAS, 2017 | canagliflozin (n=5795) vs. placebo (n=4347) | participants with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk | double-blind Sample size: 5795/4347 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: 188.2 weeks (mean) |
|
diabetes type 2 | dapagliflozin | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
DECLARE TIMI 58, 2018 | dapagliflozin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
DECLARE TIMI 58, 2018 | Dapagliflozin (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | adults with T2D at risk of CV events, including patients with multiple CV risk factors or established CV disease | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: approx 4 years (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | empagliflozin | not classified | versus placebo empagliflozin superior to placebo in terms of CV events in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 2015 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 2015 | empagliflozin vs placebo | CV events 0.86 [0.74; 0.99] Demonstrated all causes death 0.68 [0.57; 0.82] CVdeath 0.62 [0.49; 0.78] Hospitalization for heart failure 0.65 [0.50; 0.85] | | fatal and non fatal stroke 1.18 [0.89; 1.56] fatal and non fatal MI 0.87 [0.70; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 2015 | 10 mg or 25 mg of empagliflozin once daily (n=4687) vs. placebo (n=2333) | patients
with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4687/2333 Primary endpoint: death from cardiovascular FU duration: 3.1 years (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | exenatide | not classified | versus placebo exenatide superior to placebo in terms of CV events in EXSCEL, 2017 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
EXSCEL, 2017 | exenatide vs placebo | CV events 0.91 [0.83; 1.00] Demonstrated all causes death 0.86 [0.77; 0.97] | | CVdeath 0.88 [0.76; 1.02] fatal and non fatal stroke 0.85 [0.70; 1.03] fatal and non fatal MI 0.97 [0.85; 1.10] Hospitalization for heart failure 0.94 [0.78; 1.13] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
EXSCEL, 2017 | subcutaneous injections of extended-release exenatide at a dose of 2 mg once weakly (n=7356) vs. placebo (n=7396) | patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without previous cardiovascular disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7356/7396 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: 3.2 years median |
|
diabetes type 2 | glargine | not classified | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ORIGINE, 2012 | insulin glargine vs control | | | all causes death 0.98 [0.89; 1.07] amputation 0.89 [0.60; 1.32] CVdeath 1.00 [0.89; 1.13] fatal and non fatal stroke 1.03 [0.88; 1.20] fatal and non fatal MI 1.02 [0.88; 1.19] Hospitalization for heart failure 0.90 [0.77; 1.05] CV events 1.02 [0.94; 1.11] Microvascular event 0.97 [0.90; 1.05] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ORIGINE, 2012 | insulin glargine (with a target fasting blood glucose level of ¡Ü95 mg per deciliter (n=6264) vs. standard care (n=6273) | with cardiovascular risk factors plus impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or type 2 diabetes | Sample size: 6264/6273 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6.2 years |
|
diabetes type 2 | linagliptin | not classified | versus SU No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CAROLINA, 2012 | linagliptin vs glimepiride | CV events 0.46 [0.23; 0.91] | | CVdeath 1.00 [0.14; 7.14] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CAROLINA, 2012 | linagliptin (n=776) vs. glimepiride 1-4 mg QD (n=775) | patients with type 2 diabetes at elevated cardiovascular risk receiving usual care | double-blind Sample size: 776/775 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 2 years |
|
diabetes type 2 | liraglutide | not classified | versus placebo liraglutide superior to placebo in terms of CV events in LEADER, 2016 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
LEADER, 2016 | liraglutide vs placebo | CV events 0.88 [0.79; 0.97] Demonstrated all causes death 0.85 [0.75; 0.97] CVdeath 0.79 [0.66; 0.94] Microvascular event 0.85 [0.75; 0.98] Nephropathy 0.80 [0.68; 0.93] | | fatal and non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.71; 1.06] fatal and non fatal MI 0.86 [0.74; 1.00] Hospitalization for heart failure 0.88 [0.74; 1.05] Retinopathy 1.15 [0.87; 1.52] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
LEADER, 2016 | Maximum dose of 1.8 mg liraglutide, injected subcutaneously once daily (n=4668) vs. placebo (n=4672) | subjects with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: 4668/4672 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke FU duration: 3.8 years (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | lixisenatide | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ELIXA | lixisenatide vs placebo | | | all causes death 0.94 [0.78; 1.13] CV events 1.02 [0.89; 1.17] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ELIXA | lixisenatide (n=6068) vs. placebo (n=0) | patients with T2DM and a recent ACS event | double-blind Sample size: 6068/0 Primary endpoint: CVdeath, MI, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina FU duration: 25 months (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | pioglitazone | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PROACTIVE | pioglitazone vs placebo | | | | IRIS, 2016 | pioglitazone vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PROACTIVE | oral pioglitazone titrated from 15 mg to 45 mg (n=2605) vs. placebo (n=2633) | patients with type 2 diabetes who had evidence of macrovascular disease. | Sample size: 2605/2633 Primary endpoint: all cause death, MI, stroke, ACS, revascularization, amputation (above ankle) FU duration: 34.5 months | IRIS, 2016 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
diabetes type 2 | saxagliptin | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SAVOR TIMI, 2013 | saxagliptin vs placebo | | | all causes death 1.11 [0.97; 1.28] CVdeath 1.03 [0.87; 1.22] fatal and non fatal stroke 1.11 [0.88; 1.40] fatal and non fatal MI 0.95 [0.80; 1.12] CV events 1.00 [0.89; 1.12] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SAVOR TIMI, 2013 | saxagliptin (n=8280) vs. placebo (n=8212) | patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of,
or were at risk for, cardiovascular events | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 8280/8212 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke FU duration: 2.1 years (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | semaglutide | not classified | versus placebo semaglutide superior to placebo in terms of CV events in SUSTAIN 6, 2016 semaglutide inferior to placebo in terms of Retinopathy in SUSTAIN 6, 2016 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SUSTAIN 6, 2016 | semaglutide vs placebo | CV events 0.74 [0.58; 0.95] Demonstrated Nephropathy 0.64 [0.46; 0.89] | Retinopathy 1.76 [1.11; 2.79] | all causes death 1.05 [0.74; 1.49] CVdeath 0.98 [0.65; 1.48] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SUSTAIN 6, 2016 | once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) (n=1648) vs. placebo (n=1649) | patients with type 2 diabetes who were on a standardcare
regimen | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1648/1649 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI or stroke FU duration: 2.1 y (median) |
|
diabetes type 2 | sitagliptin | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TECOS, 2015 | sitagliptin vs placebo | | | all causes death 1.01 [0.90; 1.14] CVdeath 1.03 [0.89; 1.19] fatal and non fatal stroke 0.97 [0.79; 1.19] fatal and non fatal MI 0.95 [0.81; 1.11] CV events 0.99 [0.89; 1.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TECOS, 2015 | sitagliptin phosphate, one 50 mg or one 100 mg tablet (dose dependant on renal function) orally, once daily (n=7332) vs. placebo (n=7339) | patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus having a history of cardiovascular disease and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 6.5% to 8.0% | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7332/7339 Primary endpoint: CV-related death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization FU duration: 3.0 years (median) |
|