antiarrythmic drugs

Browse trials
V2  
List  

treatment    comparator  All cause death All cause death Coronary death Cardiovascular death Heart failure Major bleeding stroke (fatal and non fatal)  myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)  Death from any cause or hospitalization for any reason hospitalisation for heart failure Deep vein thrombosis  Sudden death  cardiovascular events Hypotension  Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation non cardiovascular death  stroke or TIA  Peripheral embolism  Atrial fibrillation follow-up  Hospitalization for any reason Pro-arrhythmia Ventricular fibrillation II-III atrio ventricular block  Cardiogenic shock  severe arrhythmia  Bradycardia  Flushing  non fatal VF  fatal and non fatal ventricular fibrillation fatal ventricular fibrillation Arrhythmic/sudden death  Cardiac arrhythmic death  Vascular noncardiac death  Cardiac nonarrhythmic death  hospitalization for AF  Atrial fibrillation recurrence  survival to hospital admission  Failure of return of spontaneous circulation Death before hospital admission Death before hospital discharge  death or hospitalization for cardiac causes  death by cardiac arrhythmia combined endpoint     
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------ by 459% -----NS-------------- by 47% -------
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs class I drugsNSNS------------ by 67% ----- by 70% ----------NS---NS-------
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs disopyramideNSNS------------NS--------------------NS-------
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs quinidineNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs propafenoneNSNS------------ by 774% -----NS--------------NS-------
Amiodaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs sotalolNSNS------------NS-----NS----------NS--- by 31% -------
Amiodaronecardiac arrest, in out hospital patients vs placebo------------------------------------ by 60% ------
Amiodaronecardiac arrest, in out hospital patients vs lidocaineNSNS---------------------------------- by 90% -NS----
Amiodaroneheart failure, in all type of heart failure vs no treatment by 31% by 31% ---------NS-------------------------------
Amiodaroneheart failure, in all type of heart failure vs placeboNSNS---------NS-------------------------------
Amiodaroneheart failure, in all type of heart failure vs ICDNSNS---------NS-------------------------------
Amiodaronepost myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs control by 56% by 56% ----------------------------NS------------
Amiodaronepost myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placeboNSNS----------------------------NS------------
Moricizineacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo-------------------------------------------
Moricizinepost myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo-------------------------------------------
Disopyramideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Disopyramideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs quinidineNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Disopyramideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs propafenoneNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs no treatmentNSNS------------ by 493% -----NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs disopyramide--------------------NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs flecainideNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs sotalolNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Quinidineatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs digoxinNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Flecainideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs no treatmentNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Flecainideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Flecainideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs quinidineNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Flecainideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs propafenoneNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Flecainideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs digoxinNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Propafenoneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS-----NS-------------- by 33% -------
Propafenoneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs quinidineNSNS------------ by 139% -----NS--------------NS-------
Propafenoneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs flecainideNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Propafenoneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs sotalolNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Metoprololatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------ by 233% ----- by 3000% --------------NS-------
Azimilideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------ by 130% -----NS----------------------
Azimilidepost myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo-------------------------------------------
Dofetilideacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo-------------------------------------------
Dofetilideatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS----- by 471% -------------- by 32% -------
Dofetilidepost myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo-------------------------------------------
Sotalolatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS------------NS----- by 106% -------------- by 21% -------
Sotalolatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs flecainideNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Sotalolatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs propafenoneNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Sotalolatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs bisoprololNSNS------------NS-----NS--------------NS-------
Dronedaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs placeboNSNS- by 29% -- by 135% NS-NS-- by 16% - by 55% NS----NS---------- by 45% NSNS by 34% by 29% ---- by 15% --
Dronedaroneatrial fibrillation, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion vs amiodaroneNSNS------------ by 52% --------------------NS-------
Dronedaroneatrial fibrillation, in rate control vs placeboNSNS------------NS----------------------------
Dronedaroneatrial fibrillation, in prevention of cardiovascular events vs placeboNSNS---- by 142% NS- by 126% -- by 128% --------------------------- by 45% --
Dronedaroneheart failure, in all type of heart failure vs placebo by 113% by 113% ------NS--NS-------------------------------
Magnesiumacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs controlNSNS-- by 7% -------- by 11% ------- by 11% by 7% by 10% by 61% by 642% -----------------
Magnesiumacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo by 12% by 12% --NS--------NS-------NSNS by 47% NS by 47% -----------------