antiplatelets drug

Browse trials
Matrix  

Cilostazolpercutaneous coronary intervention, in all type of patients vs aspirin

all NS

Cilostazol vs ticlopidine + aspirin

all NS

Elinogrelacute coronary syndrome, in STEMI patients vs placebo

all NS

Elinogrelacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Ticagreloracute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs clopidogrel

all cause death, MI, stroke by 16% suggested

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

Vascular death by 20% suggested

All cause death by 21% suggested

Ticagreloracute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs clopidogrel

all cause death, MI, stroke by 16% suggested

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

Vascular death by 20% suggested

All cause death by 21% suggested

Ticagrelor vs placebo (on top aspirin)

Major bleeding by 126% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 17% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 21% suggested

Coronary death by 23% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 15% suggested

Ticagrelorcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs placebo (on top aspirin)

Major bleeding by 126% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 17% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 21% suggested

Coronary death by 23% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 15% suggested

Ticagrelorcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention vs placebo (on top aspirin)

Major bleeding by 126% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 17% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 21% suggested

Coronary death by 23% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 15% suggested

Ticagrelorcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs clopidogrel

all NS

Ticagrelorperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs clopidogrel

all NS

Ticagrelor vs placebo (on top aspirin)

Major bleeding by 126% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 17% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 21% suggested

Coronary death by 23% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 15% suggested

Atopaxaracute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Atopaxaracute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs placebo

all NS

Aspirinacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 37% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 72% suggested

Vascular death by 37% suggested

Non fatal MI by 43% suggested

Aspirinacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 37% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 72% suggested

Vascular death by 37% suggested

Non fatal MI by 43% suggested

Aspirinacute coronary syndrome, in STEMI patients vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 26% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 21% suggested

Non fatal MI by 54% suggested

Non fatal stroke by 42% suggested

Aspirinacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 26% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 21% suggested

Non fatal MI by 54% suggested

Non fatal stroke by 42% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

all NS

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 29% suggested

Cardiovascular death by 27% suggested

Fatal MI by 58% suggested

Non fatal MI by 30% suggested

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in all type of patients vs no treatment

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 247% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

Peptic ulcer by 32% adverse event

Major gastrointestinal bleeding by 58% adverse event

Major bleeding by 32% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 11% suggested

Coronary event by 24% suggested

ischemic stroke by 16% suggested

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 26% suggested

Non fatal MI by 26% suggested

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in primary prevention vs no treatment

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 247% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

Peptic ulcer by 32% adverse event

Major gastrointestinal bleeding by 58% adverse event

Major bleeding by 32% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 11% suggested

Coronary event by 24% suggested

ischemic stroke by 16% suggested

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 26% suggested

Non fatal MI by 26% suggested

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in patients without established disease vs no treatment

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 247% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

Peptic ulcer by 32% adverse event

Major gastrointestinal bleeding by 58% adverse event

Major bleeding by 32% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 11% suggested

Coronary event by 21% suggested

ischemic stroke by 16% suggested

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 26% suggested

Non fatal MI by 24% suggested

Aspirincardiovascular prevention, in diabetic patients vs no treatment

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

all NS

Aspirindiabetes type 2, in patients without cardiovascular disease vs no treatment

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

all NS

Aspirindiabetes type 2, in all type of patients vs no treatment

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

Major gastrointestinal bleeding by 108% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 14% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 35% suggested

Coronary event by 35% suggested

Gastrointestinal Bleeding by 94% suggested

Non fatal MI by 40% suggested

Aspirinperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

Cardiovascular death by 28% suggested

Fatal MI by 58% suggested

Non fatal MI by 29% suggested

Aspirinpost stroke, in all type of patients vs placebo

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 21% suggested

Aspirinthrombosis prevention, in general surgery vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

Deep vein thrombosis by 31% suggested

fatal pulmonary embolism by 61% suggested

Major bleeding by 24% suggested

Aspirinthrombosis prevention, in all type of patients vs control

all NS

Aspirin vs placebo

Deep vein thrombosis by 30% suggested

fatal pulmonary embolism by 58% suggested

non-fatal pulmonary embolism by 35% suggested

proximal DVT by 56% suggested

Major bleeding by 24% suggested

Aspirin vs no treatment

Deep vein thrombosis by 67% suggested

Aspirinthrombosis prevention, in orthopedic surgery vs no treatment

Deep vein thrombosis by 67% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

Deep vein thrombosis by 29% suggested

proximal DVT by 59% suggested

non-fatal pulmonary embolism by 59% suggested

Aspirinthrombosis prevention, in elective orthopedic surgery vs no treatment

Deep vein thrombosis by 67% suggested

Aspirin vs placebo

proximal DVT by 56% suggested

Dipyridamolacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamol vs control

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs control

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

Non fatal MI by 31% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 39% suggested

Dipyridamol vs aspirin

all NS

Dipyridamolcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

Non fatal MI by 31% suggested

stroke (fatal and non fatal) by 39% suggested

Dipyridamol vs aspirin

all NS

Dipyridamolthrombosis prevention, in general surgery vs control

Deep vein thrombosis by 50% suggested

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolthrombosis prevention, in all type of patients vs control

Deep vein thrombosis by 50% suggested

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamol vs no treatment

all NS

Dipyridamolthrombosis prevention, in orthopedic surgery vs no treatment

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolthrombosis prevention, in elective orthopedic surgery vs no treatment

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Dipyridamolthrombosis prevention, in medical patients vs control

all NS

Dipyridamol vs placebo

all NS

Ketanserinecardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Ketanserineperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Picotamidecardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Picotamidecardiovascular prevention, in diabetic patients vs placebo

all NS

Picotamidediabetes type 2, in patients without cardiovascular disease vs placebo

all NS

Picotamidediabetes type 2, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Picotamideperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazoneacute coronary syndrome, in STEMI patients vs control

all NS

Sulfinpyrazone vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazoneacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazoneacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazone vs control

all NS

Sulfinpyrazone vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazone vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazonecardiovascular prevention, in diabetic patients vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazonediabetes type 2, in patients without cardiovascular disease vs placebo

all NS

Sulfinpyrazonediabetes type 2, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Suloctidilcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Suloctidilperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Suloctidilthrombosis prevention, in general surgery vs placebo

all NS

Suloctidilthrombosis prevention, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

SulotrobanCABG surgery, in all type of patients vs control

all NS

Trapidilacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 79% suggested

Trapidilacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 79% suggested

Triflusalacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs placebo

Non fatal MI by 66% suggested

Triflusalacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo

Non fatal MI by 66% suggested

Variouscardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

all NS

Variousperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

all NS

Vorapaxaracute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs placebo (on top standard therapy)

all NS

Vorapaxar vs placebo (on top aspirin)

intracranial hemorrhage by 92% adverse event

Major bleeding by 45% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 13% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 13% suggested

Vorapaxarcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo (on top aspirin)

intracranial hemorrhage by 92% adverse event

Major bleeding by 45% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 13% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 13% suggested

Vorapaxarcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs placebo (on top aspirin)

intracranial hemorrhage by 92% adverse event

Major bleeding by 45% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 13% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 13% suggested

Vorapaxarcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention vs placebo (on top aspirin)

intracranial hemorrhage by 92% adverse event

Major bleeding by 39% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 15% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 13% suggested

Vorapaxarpost myocardial infarction, in all type of patient vs placebo (on top aspirin)

intracranial hemorrhage by 92% adverse event

Major bleeding by 45% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 13% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 16% suggested

cardiovascular death, MI, stroke by 13% suggested

Clopidogrelacute coronary syndrome, in STEMI patients vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 8% suggested

Non fatal MI by 18% suggested

Clopidogrelacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs aspirin

Major bleeding by 38% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 18% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 22% suggested

Clopidogrel vs clopidogrel standard-dose

Major bleeding by 24% adverse event

Clopidogrelacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs aspirin

Major bleeding by 38% adverse event

cardiovascular events by 18% suggested

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 22% suggested

Clopidogrel vs clopidogrel standard-dose

Major bleeding by 24% adverse event

Clopidogrelacute coronary syndrome, in patients with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention vs clopidogrel standard-dose

Major bleeding by 24% adverse event

Clopidogrelacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs placebo

cardiovascular events by 8% suggested

Non fatal MI by 18% suggested

Clopidogrel vs aspirin

all NS

Clopidogrelcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs aspirin

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 37% suggested

Fatal MI by 38% suggested

Non fatal MI by 18% suggested

Clopidogrelcardiovascular prevention, in all type of patients vs aspirin

Non fatal MI by 16% suggested

Clopidogrel vs placebo (on top aspirin)

all NS

Clopidogrelcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs aspirin

Non fatal MI by 16% suggested

Clopidogrel vs placebo (on top aspirin)

all NS

Clopidogrelcardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention vs aspirin

Non fatal MI by 16% suggested

Clopidogrel vs placebo (on top aspirin)

all NS

Clopidogrelpercutaneous coronary intervention, in all type of patients vs aspirin

all NS

Clopidogrel vs ticlopidine + aspirin

all NS

Clopidogrel vs normal-dose clopidogrel

all NS

Clopidogrelperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs aspirin

myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 37% suggested

Fatal MI by 38% suggested

Clopidogrel vs aspirin

all NS

Prasugrelacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs clopidogrel

Bleeding by 30% adverse event

Major bleeding by 28% adverse event

Non fatal MI by 24% suggested

Revascularization by 33% suggested

Prasugrelacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs clopidogrel

Bleeding by 30% adverse event

Major bleeding by 28% adverse event

Non fatal MI by 24% suggested

Revascularization by 33% suggested

Prasugrelacute coronary syndrome, in patients not initialy planned for PCI vs clopidogrel

all NS

Prasugrelacute coronary syndrome, in patients with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention vs clopidogrel

fatal bleeding by 319% adverse event

Bleeding by 31% adverse event

Major bleeding by 31% adverse event

Non fatal MI by 24% suggested

Revascularization by 33% suggested

Ticlopidineacute coronary syndrome, in ACS (excluding AMI) vs control

cardiovascular events by 48% suggested

Ticlopidine vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidineacute coronary syndrome, in all type of patients vs control

cardiovascular events by 48% suggested

Ticlopidine vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidineacute coronary syndrome, in STEMI patients vs control

all NS

Ticlopidineacute myocardial infarction, in all type of patients vs control

all NS

Ticlopidine vs control

all NS

Ticlopidine vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinecardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with intermittent claudication vs placebo

Vascular death by 40% suggested

Ticlopidinecardiovascular prevention, in secondary prevention in patients with CAD vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinecardiovascular prevention, in diabetic patients vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinediabetes type 2, in patients without cardiovascular disease vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinediabetes type 2, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidine vs coumadin + aspirin

MACE by 59% suggested

Ticlopidine vs aspirin

MACE by 73% suggested

Ticlopidineperipheral vascular diseases, in all type of patient vs placebo

Vascular death by 40% suggested

Ticlopidinethrombosis prevention, in general surgery vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinethrombosis prevention, in all type of patients vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinethrombosis prevention, in orthopedic surgery vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinethrombosis prevention, in elective orthopedic surgery vs placebo

all NS

Ticlopidinethrombosis prevention, in medical patients vs placebo

all NS

UFHthrombosis prevention, in orthopedic surgery vs no treatment

Deep vein thrombosis by 52% suggested

UFH vs placebo

Deep vein thrombosis by 47% suggested

non-fatal pulmonary embolism by 191% suggested