Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
LEAD-2 (Nauck) Sulf vs pbo, 2009 | glimepiride (4 mg once daily). (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | subjects previously treated with oral antidiabetes (OAD) therapy | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 26 weeks |
Draeger, 1996 | glimepiride 1 mg daily (n=524) vs. 2.5 mg glibenclamide (n=520) | type 2 diabetic patients stabilised on glibenclamide | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 524/520 Primary endpoint: not unique FU duration: |
Dills, 1996 | glimepiride 1-16mg od (n=289) vs. non-micronized glyburide 1.25-20mg od (n=288) | patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 289/288 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Inukai, 2005 | glimepiride (n=172) vs. gliclazide or glibenclamide (n=0) | Japanese type 2 diabetic patients (HbA1C > or = 7.0%), maintained on a conventional SU | open Parallel groups Sample size: 172/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months |
Study 201 (Goldberg), 1996 | glimepiride, 1, 4, or 8 mg once daily (n=304) vs. placebo (n=0) | patients with NIDDM | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 304/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 weeks |
Schade, 1998 | glimepiride at individually determined optimal dose (1-8 mg of glimepiride) for 10+12 weeks (n=123) vs. placebo (n=126) | patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for whom diet therapy is unsuccessful | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 123/126 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rosenstock, 1996 | glimepiride 8 mg q.d., 4 mg b.i.d., 16 mg q.d., or 8 mg b.i.d (n=416) vs. placebo (n=0) | previously treated NIDDM patients | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 416/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 weeks |
Luis Bautista, 2003 | glimepiride with titration to 2 mg and 4 mg for FPG levels >120 mg/dL (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | Mexican American Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: change in HbA(1c) FU duration: 14 weeks |
Charpentier, 2001 | metformin and glimepiride (n=-9) vs. metformin (n=-9) metformin, glimepiride or metformin and glimepiride | Type 2 diabetic patients aged 35-70 years inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy 2550 mg daily | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Protocol 311 | glimepiride 1-8mg od (n=427) vs. glibenclamide 1.75-14 mg/day
(od or bid) (n=425) | | Sample size: 427/425 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Clark (301), 1997 | glimepiride 1-16 mg/day (od or bid) (n=444) vs. glipizide 2.5-40 mg/day (od or bid) (n=208) | | Sample size: 444/208 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Kaneko, 1993 | glimepiride 0.25mg od, 0.5mg od (n=62) vs. placebo (n=31) | | Sample size: 62/31 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Study 202 | glimepiride 1-8mg od (n=122) vs. placebo (n=125) | | Sample size: 122/125 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Sonnenberg, 1997 | glimepirid e6mg od (n=50) vs. glimepiride 3mg bid (n=48) | | Cross over Sample size: 50/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Charpentier (301F) | glimepiride 1-4mg od (n=96) vs. gliclazide 80-320 mg/day (od or bid) (n=107) | | Sample size: 96/107 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Riddle, 1994 | Glimepiride (16 mg/day) plus insulin (n=72) vs. insulin
plus placebo (n=73) | obese
patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled
by full dosages of sulphonylureas (glimepiride titrated up to 8mg twice daily and with laboratory-monitored FPG of 10 to 16
mmol/L (180 to 300 mg/dl)) | Sample size: 72/73 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |