Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Madsbad (vs Glimepiride), 2004 | vs placebo (add on SU) | ant hypoglycemia 0.05 [0.01; 0.41] | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events NaN [NaN; NaN] vomiting 0.58 [0.06; 5.34] diarrhoea ∞ [NaN; ∞] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Seino, 2008 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events NaN [NaN; NaN] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] ant hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Feinglos, 2005 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events NaN [NaN; NaN] nausea 0.68 [0.15; 3.12] vomiting 0.77 [0.09; 6.70] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] ant hypoglycemia 0.48 [0.10; 2.39] |
LEAD-3 mono 1.2mg (Garber), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | nausea 3.25 [2.06; 5.12] vomiting 3.40 [1.65; 7.00] diarrhoea 1.75 [1.07; 2.87] | death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] serious adverse events 1.22 [0.60; 2.47] |
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.2mg vs placebo), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 3.30 [1.92; 5.66] | vomiting 22.27 [3.11; 159.74] | death NaN [NaN; NaN] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] |
LEAD-1 SU (1.2 mg vs placebo), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 4.44 [2.32; 8.53] | nausea 4.30 [1.06; 17.42] | severe hypoglycemia ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
LEAD-4 (1.2mg), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inférieur à 6.5% 2.63 [1.74; 3.96] HbA1c inf a 7% 2.03 [1.55; 2.65] | | CV events 1.24 [0.34; 4.55] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] |
LEAD-5 (vs placebo), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 3.36 [2.16; 5.22] | nausea 3.97 [1.44; 10.94] diarrhoea 3.80 [1.17; 12.39] | CV events 2.48 [0.29; 20.97] vomiting 1.86 [0.63; 5.47] |
Madsbad (vs placebo), 2004 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events NaN [NaN; NaN] vomiting ∞ [NaN; ∞] diarrhoea ∞ [NaN; ∞] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] ant hypoglycemia ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.2 mg vs glimepiride), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] HbA1c inf a 7% 0.97 [0.77; 1.24] |
LEAD-5 (vs Glargine), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | nausea 10.76 [3.34; 34.64] vomiting 15.13 [2.02; 113.61] diarrhoea 7.73 [2.35; 25.40] | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.16 [0.96; 1.40] |
Pratley 1.2mg, 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 2.56 [1.94; 3.37] | nausea 4.56 [2.36; 8.80] | death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CV events 0.97 [0.06; 15.46] vomiting 1.87 [0.85; 4.11] diarrhoea 1.59 [0.74; 3.42] serious adverse events 1.49 [0.43; 5.19] severe adverse events 0.87 [0.32; 2.35] |
LEADER, 2016 | vs placebo (add on SU) | CV events 0.88 [0.79; 0.97] Demonstrated all causes death 0.85 [0.75; 0.97] CVdeath 0.79 [0.66; 0.94] Microvascular event 0.85 [0.75; 0.98] Nephropathy 0.80 [0.68; 0.93] | | fatal and non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.71; 1.06] fatal and non fatal MI 0.86 [0.74; 1.00] Hospitalization for heart failure 0.88 [0.74; 1.05] Retinopathy 1.15 [0.87; 1.52] |
LEAD-6, 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.26 [1.04; 1.53] | severe adverse events 2.80 [1.12; 6.97] | nausea 0.91 [0.67; 1.23] vomiting 0.60 [0.32; 1.14] diarrhoea 1.02 [0.63; 1.66] severe hypoglycemia 0.00 [0.00; NaN] serious adverse events 1.97 [0.75; 5.17] |
Seino, 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | death ∞ [NaN; ∞] diarrhoea 1.67 [0.63; 4.44] severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] treatment-emergent
adverse events (TEAEs) 0.99 [0.87; 1.12] serious adverse events 0.80 [0.34; 1.88] severe adverse events 1.48 [0.30; 7.22] |
Harder, 2004 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | |
NN2211-1571 (Vilsbøll), 2007 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | CV events NaN [NaN; NaN] nausea 2.93 [0.38; 22.40] vomiting ∞ [NaN; ∞] diarrhoea 1.69 [0.70; 4.11] |
NN2211-1796 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | |
NN2211-1333 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | |
Pratley 1.8mg, 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.99 [1.48; 2.66] | nausea 5.93 [3.11; 11.28] vomiting 2.34 [1.10; 5.00] diarrhoea 2.51 [1.24; 5.10] | death 1.00 [0.06; 15.96] CV events 0.97 [0.06; 15.46] serious adverse events 1.51 [0.43; 5.27] severe adverse events 0.88 [0.32; 2.38] |
LEAD-3 mono 1.8mg (Garber), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | nausea 3.84 [2.63; 5.59] vomiting 2.57 [1.21; 5.43] diarrhoea 2.10 [1.30; 3.38] | severe hypoglycemia NaN [NaN; NaN] serious adverse events 0.62 [0.26; 1.46] |
LEAD-4 (1.8mg), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.91 [1.46; 2.50] | | CV events 0.75 [0.17; 3.28] |
LEAD-1 SU (1.8 mg vs placebo), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 5.30 [2.78; 10.11] | | |
LEAD-1 SU (1.8 vs rosiglitazone), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.91 [1.43; 2.53] | | |
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.8 mg vs glimepiride), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.17 [0.94; 1.46] |
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.8mg vs placebo), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 3.96 [2.32; 6.76] | | |
Kaku 0.6mg, 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 3.15 [1.82; 5.46] | | |
Kaku 0.9mg, 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 4.85 [2.88; 8.14] | | |
LEAD 1 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.19 [0.95; 1.51] |
LEAD 2 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.22 [0.97; 1.52] |
LEAD 4 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | | HbA1c inf a 7% 0.94 [0.78; 1.13] |
Pratley (1.8 vs 1.2), 2010 | vs placebo (add on SU) | | HbA1c inf a 7% 0.78 [0.64; 0.94] | CV events 1.00 [0.06; 15.89] |
LEAD-1 SU (1.2 vs rosiglitazone), 2009 | vs placebo (add on SU) | HbA1c inf a 7% 1.60 [1.18; 2.15] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Madsbad (vs Glimepiride), 2004 | Liraglutide 0.045, 0.225, 0.45, 0.60, and 0.75 mg daily (n=135) vs. Glimepiride (n=26) | Outpatients with type 2 diabetes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 135/26 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 12 weeks dose-response study |
Seino, 2008 | Liraglutide 0.1, 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mg once daily for 14 weeks
(n=180) vs. Placebo
(n=46) randomized after OAD discontinuation and washout | Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 180/46 Primary endpoint: HbA1c FU duration: 14 weeks phase 2
|
Feinglos, 2005 | Liraglutide 0.045, 0.225, 0.45, 0.6 or 0.75 mg daily for 12 weeks (n=176) vs. metformin 1000mg twice daily (n=34) | subjects with Type 2 diabetes | double blind (not adequate) Parallel groups Sample size: 176/34 Primary endpoint: not defiend FU duration: 12 weeks phase 2 dose response study |
LEAD-3 mono 1.2mg (Garber), 2009 | liraglutide 1.2 mg daily
(n=251) vs. glimepiride 8 mg once daily (n=248) 3 arms : liraglutide 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily or glimepiride 8 mg once daily | patients with early type 2 diabetes
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 251/248 Primary endpoint: Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) , , FU duration: 52 weeks (104 weeks) phase 3
|
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.2mg vs placebo), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.2 mg daily
(n=241) vs. Placebo on-top of Metformin
(n=122) 5 arms : liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg, glimeripide 4mg once daily or placebo
| subjects previously treated with oral antidiabetes therapy
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 241/122 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-1 SU (1.2 mg vs placebo), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.2 mg daily
(n=228) vs. Placebo on-top of sulphonylureas
(n=115) 5 arms liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8mg, rosiglitazone or placebo | subjects with
Type 2 diabetes
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 228/115 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-4 (1.2mg), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.2 daily (n=178) vs. Placebo on-top of thiazolidinediones + metformin (n=177) 3 arms: liraglutide 1.2 or 1.8 mg, placebo | patients with type 2 diabetes, A1C 7–11% (previous OAD
monotherapy >=3 months) or 7–10% (previous OAD combination therapy >=3 months),
and BMI 45 kg/m2 | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 178/177 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks |
LEAD-5 (vs placebo), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily
(n=232) vs. Placebo on-top of sulphonylureas+metformin
(n=115)
| adult patients with type 2 diabetes
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 232/115 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks
|
Madsbad (vs placebo), 2004 | Liraglutide 0.045, 0.225, 0.45, 0.60, and 0.75 mg daily
(n=135) vs. Placebo
(n=29)
| Outpatients with type 2 diabetes
| open Sample size: 135/29 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 12 weeks dose-response study
|
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.2 mg vs glimepiride), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.2mg daily for 26 weeks (n=241) vs. Glimepiride on-top of Metformin (n=244) 5 arms: Liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily, glimepiride 4mg od, placebo | patients with type 3 diabetes previously treated with oral antidiabetes (OAD) therap | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 241/244 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks |
LEAD-5 (vs Glargine), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily (n=232) vs. Glargine on-top of sulphonylureas+metformin (n=234) | adult patients with type 2 diabetes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 232/234 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks |
Pratley 1.2mg, 2010 | liraglutide 1.2mg subcutaneously once daily (n=225) vs. oral sitagliptin 100mg once daily (n=219) 2 dose of liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg | patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycemic control with metformin | open Parallel groups Sample size: 225/219 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks |
LEADER, 2016 | Maximum dose of 1.8 mg liraglutide, injected subcutaneously once daily (n=4668) vs. placebo (n=4672) | subjects with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: 4668/4672 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke FU duration: 3.8 years (median) |
LEAD-6, 2009 | liraglutide 1.8 mg once a day (n=233) vs. exenatide 10 microg twice a day (n=231) | Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both | open Parallel groups Sample size: 233/231 Primary endpoint: change in glycosylated haemoglobin FU duration: 26 weeks |
Seino, 2010 | liraglutide 0.9 mg once daily (n=272) vs. glibenclamide once or twice daily at a planned maximum dose of 2.5 mg/day, before or after meals (n=139) | Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled with diet therapy or oral antidiabetic drug monotherapy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 272/139 Primary endpoint: HbA1c FU duration: 24-week |
Harder, 2004 | single daily subcutaneous dose of 0.6 mg liraglutide for 8 weeks (n=21) vs. placebo (n=12) | obese subjects with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 21/12 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 8 weeks |
NN2211-1571 (Vilsbøll), 2007 | liraglutide 0.65 mg, 1.25 mg or 1.9 mg for 14 weeks
(n=123) vs. placebo
(n=40)
| subjects with type 2 diabetes
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 123/40 Primary endpoint: not unique FU duration: 14 weeks phase 2, dose ranging
|
NN2211-1796 | liraglutide added to metformin (n=-9) vs. glimepiride added to metformin (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c FU duration: |
NN2211-1333 | liraglutide (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | obese subjects with type 2 diabetes | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Pratley 1.8mg, 2010 | liraglutide 1.8mg subcutaneously once daily
(n=221) vs. oral sitagliptin 100mg once daily
(n=219) 2 dose of liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg
| patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycemic control with metformin
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 221/219 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-3 mono 1.8mg (Garber), 2009 | liraglutide 1.8 mg daily
(n=247) vs. glimepiride 8 mg once daily
(n=248) 3 arms : liraglutide 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily or glimepiride 8 mg once daily
| subjects with type 2 diabetes
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 247/248 Primary endpoint: Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) , , FU duration: 52 weeks (104 weeks) phase 3
|
LEAD-4 (1.8mg), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 daily
(n=178) vs. Placebo on-top of thiazolidinediones + metformin
(n=177) 3 arms: liraglutide 1.2 or 1.8 mg, placebo
| patients with type 2 diabetes, A1C 7–11% (previous OAD
monotherapy >=3 months) or 7–10% (previous OAD combination therapy >=3 months),
and BMI 45 kg/m2
| double-blind Sample size: 178/177 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-1 SU (1.8 mg vs placebo), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily
(n=234) vs. Placebo on-top of sulphonylureas
(n=114) 5 arms liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8mg, rosiglitazone or placebo
| patients with type 2 diabetes
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 234/114 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-1 SU (1.8 vs rosiglitazone), 2009 | Liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily
(n=228) vs. rosiglitazone on-top of sulphonylureas
(n=232) 5 arms liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8mg, rosiglitazone or placebo
|
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 228/232 Primary endpoint: change in HbA1c FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.8 mg vs glimepiride), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily for 26 weeks
(n=242) vs. Glimepiride on-top of Metformin
(n=244) 5 arms: Liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily,glimepiride or placebo
| patients with type 3 diabetes previously treated with oral antidiabetes (OAD) therap
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 242/244 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks
|
LEAD-2 (Nauck) (1.8mg vs placebo), 2009 | Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily
(n=242) vs. Placebo on-top of Metformin
(n=122) 5 arms : liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg, glimeripide 4mg once daily or placebo
| subjects previously treated with oral antidiabetes therapy
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 242/122 Primary endpoint: change in A1C FU duration: 26 weeks
|
Kaku 0.6mg, 2010 | liraglutide 0.6 mg/day (n=88) vs. placebo (n=88) 3 arms:liraglutide 0.6 mg/day, 0.9 mg/day or placebo | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 88/88 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Kaku 0.9mg, 2010 | liraglutide 0.9 mg/day
(n=88) vs. placebo
(n=88) 3 arms:liraglutide 0.6 mg/day, 0.9 mg/day or placebo
| Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes
| double-blind Sample size: 88/88 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks
|
LEAD 1 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
LEAD 2 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
LEAD 4 (1.8 vs 1.2), 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Pratley (1.8 vs 1.2), 2010 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
LEAD-1 SU (1.2 vs rosiglitazone), 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |