Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Aschner, 2006 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.96 [0.40; 2.31] |
Goldstein, 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.74 [0.32; 1.71] |
Hanefeld, 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 1.01 [0.39; 2.59] |
Nonaka, 2008 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Raz, 2006 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Scott* (sit vs pbo), 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 3.07 [0.32; 29.15] |
Goldstein (sit vs met), 2007 | vs placebo | | | |
Scott* (sit vs glipi), 2007 | vs placebo | | | |
Charbonnel, 2006 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 1.34 [0.60; 2.98] |
Goldstein (sit+met vs met), 2007 | vs placebo | | | |
Hermansen, 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 2.74 [0.29; 25.95] |
Nauck, 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 0.76 [0.40; 1.44] |
Rosenstock (sit on top pio vs pbo), 2006 | vs placebo | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 5.59 [1.26; 24.88] | | |
Scott** (sit vs pbo on top met), 2007 | vs placebo | | | Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 3.87 [0.44; 33.99] |
Al Sifri, 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Pérez-Monteverde, 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Stafford , 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Barzilai, 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Reasner, 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Arechavaleta, 2011 | vs placebo | | | |
Iwamoto , 2010 | vs placebo | | | |
Vilsbøll, 2010 | vs placebo | | | |
Aschner, 2010 | vs placebo | | | |
Derosa , 2010 | vs placebo | | | |
Rigby , 2010 | vs placebo | | | |
Mohan , 2009 | vs placebo | | | |
Chan, 2008 | vs placebo | | | |
raz, 2008 | vs placebo | | | |
Rosenstock , 2006 | vs placebo | | | |
TECOS, 2015 | vs placebo | | | all causes death 1.01 [0.90; 1.14] CVdeath 1.03 [0.89; 1.19] fatal and non fatal stroke 0.97 [0.79; 1.19] fatal and non fatal MI 0.95 [0.81; 1.11] CV events 0.99 [0.89; 1.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Aschner, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 or 200 mg dailym (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Goldstein, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Hanefeld, 2007 | sitagliptin 25 mg or 50 mg or 100 mg dailyi (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Nonaka, 2008 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily monotherapy (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Raz, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg (or 200 mg) daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Scott* (sit vs pbo), 2007 | sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Goldstein (sit vs met), 2007 | sitagliptin 100 dailyily (n=-9) vs. metformin 1000 mg or 2000 mg daily;imag (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Scott* (sit vs glipi), 2007 | sitagliptin 50mg bid (n=-9) vs. glipizide 5mg to 20 mg dailyitm (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control on diet and exercise | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
Charbonnel, 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on tometformin therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Goldstein (sit+met vs met), 2007 | sitagliptin 50 mg daily plus metformin 1000 or 2000 mg dailyç$4 (n=-9) vs. metformin 1000 or 2000 mg daily (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Hermansen, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to ongoing stable doses of glimepiride, alone or in combination with metformin)ocumen (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to ongoing stable doses of glimepiride, alone or in combination with metformin); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Nauck, 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to metformin therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rosenstock (sit on top pio vs pbo), 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to pioglitazone therapy)sl˜ðõØ (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to pioglitazone therapy); (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Scott** (sit vs pbo on top met), 2007 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (add-on to metformin therapy)j (n=-9) vs. placebo (add-on to metformin therapy). (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately on mET monotherapy | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Al Sifri, 2011 | sitagliptin 100 mg qd (n=507) vs. prestudy sulphonylurea (n=514) | Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a stable dose of a sulphonylurea with or without metformin for at least 3 months | open Parallel groups Sample size: 507/514 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Pérez-Monteverde, 2011 | sitagliptin100 mg qd (n=-9) vs. pioglitazone 15 mg qd, up-titrated to 30 mg after 6 weeks (n=-9) | drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
Stafford , 2011 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Barzilai, 2011 | once-daily sitagliptin (100 or 50 mg, depending on renal function) (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | elderly patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Reasner, 2011 | sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg bid uptitrated over 4 weeks to achieve maximum doses of sitagliptin/metformin 50/1000 mg bid (n=-9) vs. metformin monotherapy (n=-9) | drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes | NA Cross over Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Arechavaleta, 2011 | sitagliptin 100 mg daily (n=516) vs. glimepiride (starting dose 1 mg/day and up-titrated, based upon patient's self-monitoring of blood glucose results, to a maximum dose of up to 6 mg/day) (n=519) | patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 516/519 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 weeks |
Iwamoto , 2010 | sitagliptin 50 mg once daily monotherapy (n=-9) vs. voglibose 0.2 mg thrice daily before meals (n=-9) | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
Vilsbøll, 2010 | once-daily sitagliptin 100 mg (n=322) vs. placebo (n=319) | patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on long-acting, intermediate-acting or premixed insulin | double-blind Sample size: 322/319 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Aschner, 2010 | once-daily sitagliptin 100 mg (n=528) vs. twice-daily metformin 1000 mg (n=522) | treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Sample size: 528/522 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
Derosa , 2010 | pioglitazone 30 mg plus sitagliptin 100 mg once a day (n=-9) vs. pioglitazone 15 mg plus metformin 850 mg twice a day (n=-9) | poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rigby , 2010 | sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily (n=-9) vs. rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily (n=-9) | type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy | open Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 16 weeks |
Mohan , 2009 | sitagliptin 100mg once daily monotherapy (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | Chinese, Indian, and Korean patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise. | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 18 weeks |
Chan, 2008 | sitagliptin (n=65) vs. placebo (n=26) | patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency | double-blind Sample size: 65/26 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
raz, 2008 | sitagliptin 100 mg once daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
Rosenstock , 2006 | sitagliptin 100 mg once daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 weeks |
TECOS, 2015 | sitagliptin phosphate, one 50 mg or one 100 mg tablet (dose dependant on renal function) orally, once daily (n=7332) vs. placebo (n=7339) | patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus having a history of cardiovascular disease and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 6.5% to 8.0% | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7332/7339 Primary endpoint: CV-related death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization FU duration: 3.0 years (median) |