peripheral vascular diseases | All results are NS for efficacy | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
APIC, 1989 | Acenocoumarol INR 2-4.5 (n=72) vs. Placebo (n=74) | AOMI syade II | Simple aveugle Factorial plan Sample size: 72/74 Primary endpoint: Périmètre de marche FU duration: 1 an |
|
thrombosis prevention | All results are NS for efficacy inferior to Nadroparin in terms of major hemorrhage in Samama, 2001 | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Hamulyak, 1994 | vs Nadroparin | | | major hemorrhage 1.60 [0.38; 6.82] clinical PE NaN [NaN; NaN] DVT 1.18 [0.81; 1.70] proximal DVT 0.89 [0.46; 1.75] | Samama, 2001 | vs Nadroparin | | major hemorrhage 3.89 [1.20; 12.64] | Death ∞ [NaN; ∞] clinical PE ∞ [NaN; ∞] DVT 1.35 [0.70; 2.61] proximal DVT 1.35 [0.30; 6.00] | | vs Nadroparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Hamulyak, 1994 | Acenocoumarol (n=342) vs. Nadroparin 60 anti-Xa IU /kg x1 (n=330) | THR or TKR (stratified) | single blind Sample size: 342/330 Primary endpoint: FU duration: Day 10 ± 2 | Samama, 2001 | Acenocoumarol (n=645) vs. Reviparin 4200 anti-Xa IU x1 (n=644) | THR | Open Sample size: 645/644 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 weeks | van Geloven, 1977 | Acenocoumarol (n=11) vs. UFH 4000 ·x2 (n=11) | THR | double blind Sample size: 11/11 Primary endpoint: FU duration: NA |
|