Sirolimus eluting stent Drug eluting stent

CYPHER

Acute myocardial infarction

All type of patients:  8 trials  - TYPHOON - SESAMI - MISSION - PROSIT - Di Lorenzo et al. - Díaz de la Llera - Juwana - DEBATER (SES vs BMS)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 52% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 35% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 64% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 72% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

Coronary artery disease

Acute myocardial infarction:  7 trials  - TYPHOON - SESAMI - MISSION - PROSIT - SORT OUT II - Díaz de la Llera - DEBATER (SES vs BMS)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 52% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 35% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 64% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 72% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

See more clinical conditions

All type of patient:  48 trials  - Tomai - Kochiadakis - RAVEL - SIRIUS - C-SIRIUS - E-SIRIUS - SES-SMART - DIABETES - Pache et al - PRISON II - SCANDSTENT - TYPHOON - SESAMI - DECODE - SCORPIUS - MISSION - Ortolani et al - TAXi - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES) - ISAR-DIABETES - SIRTAX (Windecker) - CORPAL - REALITY - ISAR-SMART 3 - Zhang (SES vs PES) - LONG DES II - PROSIT - SORT OUT II - Cervinka - Petronio et al - Han - BASKET (vs paclitaxel) - Di Lorenzo et al. - Pasceri - DES-ISR - GISSOC II - FOCUS - Lipsia-Yukon-DM - ISAR-TEST-1 - ISAR-LEFT-MAIN - MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions - Munich Study - BASKET-PROVE - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PTCA) - Pan - Gao - Thiele - PRECOMBAT

PCI withsirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 76% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 63% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 69% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 74% (not demonstrated)

suggested CABG by 58% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 82% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs CABG

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs cutting ballon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs Firebird eluting stent

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 23% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 37% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 29% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 23% (not demonstrated)

suggested 4y stent thrombosis (ARC) by 33% (not demonstrated)

All type of patients:  52 trials  - Tomai - Kochiadakis - RAVEL - SIRIUS - C-SIRIUS - E-SIRIUS - SES-SMART - DIABETES - Pache et al - PRISON II - SCANDSTENT - TYPHOON - SESAMI - DECODE - SCORPIUS - MISSION - Ortolani et al - TAXi - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES) - ISAR-DIABETES - SIRTAX (Windecker) - CORPAL - REALITY - ISAR-SMART 3 - Zhang (SES vs PES) - LONG DES II - PROSIT - SORT OUT II - Cervinka - Petronio et al - Han - BASKET (vs paclitaxel) - Di Lorenzo et al. - Pasceri - DES-ISR - GISSOC II - FOCUS - Lipsia-Yukon-DM - ISAR-TEST-1 - ISAR-LEFT-MAIN - MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions - Munich Study - BASKET-PROVE - Kim - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PTCA) - Pan - DES-DIABETES - Gao - Thiele - DEBATER (SES vs BMS) - BASKET-PROVE (SES) - PRECOMBAT

PCI withsirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 76% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 33% (not demonstrated)

suggested MACE by 62% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 44% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 59% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 74% (not demonstrated)

suggested CABG by 58% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 81% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs CABG

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs cutting ballon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs Firebird eluting stent

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 25% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 40% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 31% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 32% (not demonstrated)

suggested 4y stent thrombosis (ARC) by 33% (not demonstrated)

Bifurcation lesion:  1 trials  - Pan

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 70% (not demonstrated)

Bypass graft lesion:  1 trials  - RRISC

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested 2 yr Death (all cause) by 2139% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 81% (not demonstrated)

Diabetic patients :  14 trials  - Tomai - DIABETES - DECODE - ISAR-DIABETES - Ravel (diabetics) - SES-SMARt (diabetics) - Lipsia-Yukon-DM - SIRTAX diabetics - DESSERT - Kim - TAxi (diabetics) - REALITY (diabetics) - SIRIUS (diabetics) - DES-DIABETES

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 55% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 69% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 75% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr TLR by 78% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 75% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 88% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 36% (not demonstrated)

suggested in-lesion binary restenosis by 79% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 75% (not demonstrated)

In stent restenosis:  7 trials  - SISR - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES) - CRISTAL - DES-ISR - FOCUS - ISAR-DESIRE-2 - RIBS-II

sirolimus eluting stent vs brachytherapy

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 48% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 50% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 56% (not demonstrated)

suggested CABG by 92% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs cutting ballon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs PTCA

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 62% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 65% (not demonstrated)

Long or complex lesion:  4 trials  - PRISON II - SCANDSTENT - CORPAL - LONG DES II

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 86% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 64% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 87% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 87% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 58% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 38% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 75% (not demonstrated)

Single vessel disease:  1 trials  - Thiele

PCI withsirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

No demonstrated result

Small vessels:  3 trials  - SES-SMART - ISAR-SMART 3 - SIRTAX (small vessels subgroup)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) by 80% (not demonstrated)

suggested MACE by 70% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 67% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 82% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 51% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 52% (not demonstrated)

Total occlusion:  3 trials  - PRISON II - GISSOC II - SCANDSTENT (subgroup)

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 83% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 73% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr TLR by 453% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 79% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 85% (not demonstrated)

Unparticular patients:  20 trials  - Kochiadakis - RAVEL - SIRIUS - C-SIRIUS - E-SIRIUS - Pache et al - Ortolani et al - TAXi - SIRTAX (Windecker) - REALITY - Zhang (SES vs PES) - SORT OUT II - Han - BASKET (vs paclitaxel) - ISAR-TEST-1 - MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions - Munich Study - Wessely - BASKET-PROVE - Gao

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 59% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 74% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 81% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs CABG

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs Firebird eluting stent

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

Unprotected left main artery stenosis:  1 trials  - ISAR-LEFT-MAIN

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

Stable angina

All type of patient:  38 trials  - Tomai - Kochiadakis - RAVEL - SIRIUS - C-SIRIUS - E-SIRIUS - SES-SMART - DIABETES - Pache et al - PRISON II - SCANDSTENT - DECODE - SCORPIUS - Ortolani et al - TAXi - ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES) - ISAR-DIABETES - SIRTAX (Windecker) - CORPAL - REALITY - ISAR-SMART 3 - Zhang (SES vs PES) - LONG DES II - Cervinka - Petronio et al - Han - BASKET (vs paclitaxel) - Di Lorenzo et al. - Pasceri - DES-ISR - GISSOC II - FOCUS - Lipsia-Yukon-DM - ISAR-TEST-1 - ISAR-LEFT-MAIN - MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions - Kim - Thiele

PCI withsirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 65% (not demonstrated)

suggested 2 yr MACE by 69% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 60% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 75% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 83% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs CABG

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs cutting ballon angioplasty

No demonstrated result

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

suggested MACE by 20% (not demonstrated)

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 37% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 27% (not demonstrated)

suggested angiographic restenosis by 25% (not demonstrated)

suggested 4y stent thrombosis (ARC) by 44% (not demonstrated)

See more clinical conditions

Diabetic patients :  2 trials  - DESSERT - Kim

sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

No demonstrated result

suggested target-vessel revascularization by 75% (not demonstrated)

suggested target lesion revascularisation by 80% (not demonstrated)

sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

No demonstrated result

Single vessel disease:  1 trials  - Thiele

PCI withsirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

No demonstrated result