apitolisib versus everolimus | |||
Powles, 2014 | versus | ||
axitinib versus sorafenib | |||
AXIS (Rini), 2011 NCT00678392 | axitinib versus | second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer | |
Qin, 2012 | versus | ||
bevacizumab versus placebo | |||
Yang, 2003 | bevacizumab at doses of 3 and 10 mg per kilogram of body weight, given every two weeks versus placebo | patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma | |
bevacizumab plus interferon alfa versus interferon alpha | |||
CALGB 90206, 2010 | bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus IFN- (9 million units subcutaneously
three times weekly) versus same dose and schedule of IFN- monotherapy | Patients with previously untreated, metastatic clear cell RCC | |
AVOREN, 2007 | bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus IFN (9 MIU subcutaneously three times a week) versus IFN plus placebo | patients with previously untreated mRCC | |
BNC105P + everolimus versus everolimus | |||
Disruptor-1, | versus | ||
cabozantinib versus everolimus | |||
METEOR, 2015 NCT01865747 | cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg
daily versus everolimus at a dose of 10 mg daily | patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy | open-label |
cabozantinib versus sunitinib | |||
CABOSUN, 2017 NCT01835158 | cabozantinib (60 mg once per day) versus sunitinib (50 mg once per day; 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). | untreated clear cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and were intermediate or poor risk per International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria | open-label |
dovitinib versus sorafenib | |||
GOLD, NCT01223027 | dovitinib (500 mg orally according to a 5-days-on and 2-days-off schedule) versus sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) | patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received one previous VEGF-targeted therapy and one previous mTOR inhibitor | open-label |
everolimus versus placebo | |||
RECORD-1, 2008 NCT00410124 | everolimus 10 mg once daily versus placebo | Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma which had progressed on sunitinib, sorafenib, or both | |
everolimus versus sunitinib | |||
RECORD 3, 2014 NCT00903175 | everolimus versus sunitinib | patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma | |
nivolumab versus everolimus | |||
Chekmate 025 (Motzer), 2015 NCT01668784 | 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks versus 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily | patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy | open-label |
nivolumab + ipilimumab versus sunitinib | |||
CheckMate-214, 2017 NCT02231749 | nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by Opdivo 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks versus sunitinib 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off before continuation of treatment | intermediate and poor-risk patients previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma | open-label |
pazopanib versus placebo | |||
Sternberg, 2010 | pazopanib versus placebo | treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma | double-blind |
VEG105192, 2010 NCT00334282 | versus | treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma | |
pazopanib versus sunitinib | |||
COMPARZ, 2013 NCT00720941 | continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily) versus sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) | patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, first line | |
sorafenib versus interferon alpha | |||
Escudier, 2009 | oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily versus subcutaneous IFN--2a 9 million U three times weekly | patients with untreated, advanced renal cancer. | |
sorafenib versus placebo | |||
TARGET, 2007 NCT00073307 | continuous treatment with oral sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) versus placebo | patients with renal-cell carcinoma that was resistant to standard therapy | |
Ratain, 2006 | versus | patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma | |
sunitinib versus interferon alpha | |||
Motzer, 2007 NCT00083889 | repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib (at a dose of 50 mg given orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) versus interferon alfa (at a dose of 9 MU given subcutaneously three times weekly). | patients with previously untreated, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma | |
sunitinib versus sorafenib | |||
SWITCH, NCT00732914 | versus | ||
temsirolimus versus interferon alpha | |||
ARCC (Hudes) temsirolimus alone, 2007 NCT00065468 | 25 mg of intravenoustemsirolimus weekly versus 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 millionU) subcutaneously three times weekly | patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma | |
temsirolimus versus sorafenib | |||
INTORSECT, 2014 NCT00474786 | temsirolimus 25 mg once weekly by intravenous (IV) infusion versus sorafenib 400 mg PO twice daily | Second-Line Therapy In Patients With Advanced RCC Who Have Failed First-Line Sunitinib | |
tivozanib versus sorafenib | |||
TIVO-1, 2013 NCT01030783 | tivozanib versus sorafenib | initial targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |